- Award ID(s):
- 1905262
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10507759
- Publisher / Repository:
- ACS Publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ACS Nano
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1936-0851
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 8433 to 8441
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- silver cluster metal cluster coordinating solvent
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
null (Ed.)Understanding the origin and structural basis of the photoluminescence (PL) phenomenon in thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters is of paramount importance for both fundamental science and practical applications. It remains a major challenge to correlate the PL properties with the atomic-level structure due to the complex interplay of the metal core ( i.e. the inner kernel) and the exterior shell ( i.e. surface Au( i )-thiolate staple motifs). Decoupling these two intertwined structural factors is critical in order to understand the PL origin. Herein, we utilize two Au 28 (SR) 20 nanoclusters with different –R groups, which possess the same core but different shell structures and thus provide an ideal system for the PL study. We discover that the Au 28 (CHT) 20 (CHT: cyclohexanethiolate) nanocluster exhibits a more than 15-fold higher PL quantum yield than the Au 28 (TBBT) 20 nanocluster (TBBT: p-tert -butylbenzenethiolate). Such an enhancement is found to originate from the different structural arrangement of the staple motifs in the shell, which modifies the electron relaxation dynamics in the inner core to different extents for the two nanoclusters. The emergence of a long PL lifetime component in the more emissive Au 28 (CHT) 20 nanocluster reveals that its PL is enhanced by suppressing the nonradiative pathway. The presence of long, interlocked staple motifs is further identified as a key structural parameter that favors the luminescence. Overall, this work offers structural insights into the PL origin in Au 28 (SR) 20 nanoclusters and provides some guidelines for designing luminescent metal nanoclusters for sensing and optoelectronic applications.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Thiolate-protected metal nanoclusters (TPNCs) have attracted great interest in the last few decades due to their high stability, atomically precise structure, and compelling physicochemical properties. Among their various applications, TPNCs exhibit excellent catalytic activity for numerous reactions; however, recent work revealed that these systems must undergo partial ligand removal in order to generate active sites. Despite the importance of ligand removal in both catalysis and stability of TPNCs, the role of ligands and metal type in the process is not well understood. Herein, we utilize Density Functional Theory to understand the energetic interplay between metal–sulfur and sulfur–ligand bond dissociation in metal–thiolate systems. We first probe 66 metal–thiolate molecular complexes across combinations of M = Ag, Au, and Cu with twenty-two different ligands (R). Our results reveal that the energetics to break the metal–sulfur and sulfur–ligand bonds are strongly correlated and can be connected across all complexes through metal atomic ionization potentials. We then extend our work to the experimentally relevant [M 25 (SR) 18 ] − TPNC, revealing the same correlations at the nanocluster level. Importantly, we unify our work by introducing a simple methodology to predict TPNC ligand removal energetics solely from calculations performed on metal–ligand molecular complexes. Finally, a computational mechanistic study was performed to investigate the hydrogenation pathways for SCH 3 -based complexes. The energy barriers for these systems revealed, in addition to thermodynamics, that kinetics favor the break of S–R over the M–S bond in the case of the Au complex. Our computational results rationalize several experimental observations pertinent to ligand effects on TPNCs. Overall, our introduced model provides an accelerated path to predict TPNC ligand removal energies, thus aiding towards targeted design of TPNC catalysts.more » « less
-
Abstract Chirality is ubiquitous in nature and occurs at all length scales. The development of applications for chiral nanostructures is rising rapidly. With the recent achievements of atomically precise nanochemistry, total structures of ligand‐protected Au and other metal nanoclusters (NCs) are successfully obtained, and the origins of chirality are discovered to be associated with different parts of the cluster, including the surface ligands (e.g., swirl patterns), the organic–inorganic interface (e.g., helical stripes), and the kernel. Herein, a unified picture of metal–ligand surface bonding‐induced chirality for the nanoclusters is proposed. The different bonding modes of M–X (where M = metal and X = the binding atom of ligand) lead to different surface structures on nanoclusters, which in turn give rise to various characteristic features of chirality. A comparison of Au–thiolate NCs with Au–phosphine ones further reveals the important roles of surface bonding. Compared to the Au–thiolate NCs, the Ag/Cu/Cd–thiolate systems exhibit different coordination modes between the metal and the thiolate. Other than thiolate and phosphine ligands, alkynyls are also briefly discussed. Several methods of obtaining chiroptically active nanoclusters are introduced, such as enantioseparation by high‐performance liquid chromatography and enantioselective synthesis. Future perspectives on chiral NCs are also proposed.
-
Since their discovery, thiolate-protected gold nanoclusters (Au n (SR) m ) have garnered a lot of interest due to their fascinating properties and “magic-number” stability. However, models describing the thermodynamic stability and electronic properties of these nanostructures as a function of their size are missing in the literature. Herein, we employ first principles calculations to rationalize the stability of fifteen experimentally determined gold nanoclusters in conjunction with a recently developed thermodynamic stability theory on small Au nanoclusters (≤102 Au atoms). Our results demonstrate that the thermodynamic stability theory can capture the stability of large, atomically precise nanoclusters, Au 279 (SR) 84 , Au 246 (SR) 80 , and Au 146 (SR) 57 , suggesting its applicability over larger cluster size regimes than its original development. Importantly, we develop structure–property relationships on Au nanoclusters, connecting their ionization potential and electron affinity to the number of gold atoms within the nanocluster. Altogether, a computational scheme is described that can aid experimental efforts towards a property-specific, targeted synthesis of gold nanoclusters.more » « less
-
Understanding the critical roles of ligands ( e.g. thiolates, SR) in the formation of metal nanoclusters of specific sizes has long been an intriguing task since the report of ligand exchange-induced transformation of Au 38 (SR) 24 into Au 36 (SR′) 24 . Herein, we conduct a systematic study of ligand exchange on Au 38 (SC 2 H 4 Ph) 24 with 21 incoming thiols and reveal that the size/structure preference is dependent on the substituent site. Specifically, ortho -substituted benzenethiols preserve the structure of Au 38 (SR) 24 , while para - or non-substituted benzenethiols cause its transformation into Au 36 (SR) 24 . Strong electron-donating or -withdrawing groups do not make a difference, but they will inhibit full ligand exchange. Moreover, the crystal structure of Au 38 (SR) 24 (SR = 2,4-dimethylbenzenethiolate) exhibits distinctive π⋯π stacking and “anagostic” interactions (indicated by substantially short Au⋯H distances). Theoretical calculations reveal the increased energies of frontier orbitals for aromatic ligand-protected Au 38 , indicating decreased electronic stability. However, this adverse effect could be compensated for by the Au⋯H–C interactions, which improve the geometric stability when ortho -substituted benzenethiols are used. Overall, this work reveals the substituent site effects based on the Au 38 model, and highlights the long-neglected “anagostic” interactions on the surface of Au-SR NCs which improve the structural stability.more » « less