Abstract Popular evapotranspiration (ET) partitioning methods make assumptions that might not be well‐suited to dryland ecosystems, such as high sensitivity of plant water‐use efficiency (WUE) to vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Our objectives were to (a) create an ET partitioning model that can produce fine‐scale estimates of transpiration (T) in drylands, and (b) use this approach to evaluate how climate controls T and WUE across ecosystem types and timescales along a dryland aridity gradient. We developed a novel, semi‐mechanistic ET partitioning method using a Bayesian approach that constrains abiotic evaporation using process‐based models, and loosely constrains time‐varying WUE within an autoregressive framework. We used this method to estimate daily T and weekly WUE across seven dryland ecosystem types and found that T dominates ET across the aridity gradient. Then, we applied cross‐wavelet coherence analysis to evaluate the temporal coherence between focal response variables (WUE and T/ET) and environmental variables. At yearly scales, we found that WUE at less arid, higher elevation sites was primarily limited by atmospheric moisture demand, and WUE at more arid, lower elevation sites was primarily limited by moisture supply. At sub‐yearly timescales, WUE and VPD were sporadically correlated. Hence, ecosystem‐scale dryland WUE is not always sensitive to changes in VPD at short timescales, despite this being a common assumption in many ET partitioning models. This new ET partitioning method can be used in dryland ecosystems to better understand how climate influences physically and biologically driven water fluxes. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            The effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on water use efficiency in Mid-South rice
                        
                    
    
            Improved water management is a growing need in areas where rice production is intensive. In the state of Arkansas and other portions of the US, new irrigation practices are being implemented to conserve water during rice cultivation. The goal of this study was to evaluate canopy water use in two commercial rice fields using different irrigation practices across three growing seasons. Canopy water use was assessed across multiple metrics, including different representations of water use efficiency (WUE) as well as their contributing terms, gross primary production (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). Furthermore, we validated and employed a methodology for estimating transpiration from ET using the concept of underlying water use efficiency (uWUE) that includes a sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Periodic drying associated with the alternate wetting and drying irrigation practice did not result in decreased GPP, ET, or transpiration (T). Our findings indicated that approximately 43 to 56 % of ET is released as T during the growing season. The uWUE method improved the relationship between GPP and ET by accounting for the limitation of VPD on GPP during the afternoon periods. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1752083
- PAR ID:
- 10507915
- Publisher / Repository:
- Elsevier
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
- Volume:
- 353
- Issue:
- C
- ISSN:
- 0168-1923
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 110069
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            null (Ed.)With population growth and resource depletion, maximizing the efficiency of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropping systems is urgently needed. The goal of this study was to shed light on precise irrigation amounts and optimal agronomic practices via simulating rice–rice and soybean–rice crop rotations in the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model. The APEX model was calibrated using observations from five fields under soybean–rice rotation in Arkansas from 2017 to 2019 and remote sensing leaf area index (LAI) values to assess modeled vegetation growth. Different irrigation practices were assessed, including conventional flooding (CVF), known as cascade, multiple inlet rice irrigation with polypipe (MIRI), and furrow irrigation (FIR). The amount of water used differed between fields, following each field’s measured or estimated input. Moreover, fields were managed with either continuous flooding (CF) or alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation. Two 20-year scenarios were simulated to test yield changes: (1) between rice–rice and soybean–rice rotation and (2) under reduced irrigation amounts. After calibration with crop yield and LAI, the modeled LAI correlated to the observations with R2 values greater than 0.66, and the percent bias (PBIAS) values were within 32%. The PBIAS and percent difference for modeled versus observed yield were within 2.5% for rice and 15% for soybean. Contrary to expectation, the rice–rice and soybean–rice rotation yields were not statistically significant. The results of the reduced irrigation scenario differed by field, but reducing irrigation beyond 20% from the original amount input by the farmers significantly reduced yields in all fields, except for one field that was over-irrigated.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Trees regulate canopy temperature (Tc) via transpiration to maintain an optimal temperature range. In diverse forests such as those of the eastern United States, the sensitivity ofTcto changing environmental conditions may differ across species, reflecting wide variability in hydraulic traits. However, these links are not well understood in mature forests, whereTcdata have historically been difficult to obtain. Recent advancement of thermal imaging cameras (TICs) enablesTcmeasurement of previously inaccessible tall trees. By leveraging TIC and sap flux measurements, we investigated how co‐occurring trees (Quercus alba,Q. falcata, andPinus virginiana) change theirTcand vapor pressure deficit near the canopy surface (VPDc) in response to changing air temperature (Ta) and atmospheric VPD (VPDa). We found a weaker cooling effect for the species that most strongly regulates stomatal function during dry conditions (isohydric;P. virginiana). Specifically, the pine had higherTc(up to 1.3°C) and VPDc(up to 0.3 kPa) in the afternoon and smaller sensitivity of both∆T(=Tc − Ta) and∆VPD (=VPDc − VPDa) to changing conditions. Furthermore, significant differences inTcand VPDcbetween sunlit and shaded portions of a canopy implied a non‐evaporative effect onTcregulation. Specifically,Tcwas more homogeneous within the pine canopy, reflecting differences in leaf morphology that allow higher canopy transmittance of solar radiation. The variability ofTcamong species (up to 1.3°C) was comparable to the previously reported differences in surface temperature across land cover types (1°C to 2°C), implying the potential for significant impact of species composition change on local/regional surface temperature.more » « less
- 
            Evaporative Stress Index (ESI), also sometimes referred as Evaporative Stress Ratio (ESR), has been widely used as an indicator of vegetation evaporative stress, and is often used to track forest and agriculture droughts. Lower the stress, higher is the value of ESI or ESR. The goal of this study is to assess the suitability of these indices for tracking vegetation evaporative stress. As the dynamics of water loss from vegetation through transpiration (T) can be different than that of evapotranspiration (ET) from the ecosystem, it is hypothesized that ESI or ESR may not be sufficiently representative of the vegetation evaporative stress. Using eddy covariance flux tower data of 518 site years, distributed across 49-sites and 9 land covers globally, our findings reveal underestimation of vegetation evaporative stress by ESI during periods of high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and overestimation during dry, low-VPD periods. The results highlight the need to improve representativeness of ESI for monitoring vegetation evaporative stress. Notably, this may entail accurate estimation of ecosystem T in systems lacking in-situ data, a challenge that warrants further attention.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Quantifying relative contributions of plant transpiration (T) and soil evaporation to evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial to better understand how vegetation influences and controlsET, the largest efflux of the terrestrial water balance. Here, we derive estimates of transpiration fraction (T/ET) using consistent isotope‐basedETpartitioning methods for 13 sites spanning five ecosystem types of the continental US, capturing 56 snapshots ofT/ETduring the growing season. We found transpiration dominated theETflux across all sites with a meanT/ETof 0.81 ± 0.08 (±standard error). Sites and dates with higher vegetation indices exhibited higherT/ETand transpiration rates, with the latter increasing 0.30 mm/day per unit Leaf Area Index and 2.9 mm/day per unit Normalized Difference Vegetation Index. Counter to expectations, antecedent precipitation had no effect onT/ET. Despite the breadth of ecosystems and conditions represented, evaporation exceeded transpiration only once, suggesting that evaporation rarely dominatesETin the growing season.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    