Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Simulating Soybean–Rice Rotation and Irrigation Strategies in Arkansas, USA Using APEX
With population growth and resource depletion, maximizing the efficiency of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropping systems is urgently needed. The goal of this study was to shed light on precise irrigation amounts and optimal agronomic practices via simulating rice–rice and soybean–rice crop rotations in the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) model. The APEX model was calibrated using observations from five fields under soybean–rice rotation in Arkansas from 2017 to 2019 and remote sensing leaf area index (LAI) values to assess modeled vegetation growth. Different irrigation practices were assessed, including conventional flooding (CVF), known as cascade, multiple inlet rice irrigation with polypipe (MIRI), and furrow irrigation (FIR). The amount of water used differed between fields, following each field’s measured or estimated input. Moreover, fields were managed with either continuous flooding (CF) or alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation. Two 20-year scenarios were simulated to test yield changes: (1) between rice–rice and soybean–rice rotation and (2) under reduced irrigation amounts. After calibration with crop yield and LAI, the modeled LAI correlated to the observations with R2 values greater than 0.66, and the percent bias (PBIAS) values were within 32%. The PBIAS and percent difference for modeled versus observed yield were within 2.5% for rice and 15% for soybean. Contrary to expectation, the rice–rice and soybean–rice rotation yields were not statistically significant. The results of the reduced irrigation scenario differed by field, but reducing irrigation beyond 20% from the original amount input by the farmers significantly reduced yields in all fields, except for one field that was over-irrigated.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1752083
PAR ID:
10217352
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Sustainability
Volume:
12
Issue:
17
ISSN:
2071-1050
Page Range / eLocation ID:
6822
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Agronomy Journal)
    Abstract Diversified crop rotations offer multiple agroecosystem benefits like closing yield gaps, reducing environmental impact, improving resiliency, and enhancing farm profitability. We used data from a 16‐year crop rotation experiment in SW Michigan that was conducted with no external agrochemical inputs to isolate and evaluate the “crop rotation effect” on grain yields, the relative yield gap compared to county‐level means, and profitability. Treatments were maize (Zea maysL.), soybean (Glycine maxL. merr.), and winter wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) systematically diversified in combination with one another and non‐harvested winter cover crops (red clover [Trifolium pratenseL.] or crimson clover [T. incarnatumL.] and cereal rye [Secale cerealeL.]). Across all three cash crops, adding any crop in rotation reduced relative yield gaps compared to monocrops by ∼77%, 20%, and 58% for maize, soybean, and winter wheat, respectively. Diversified rotations, particularly those including leguminous cover crops, increased maize and winter wheat grain yields by up to 95% and 64% relative to 2‐ and 3‐year rotations without legume cover crops and improved economic returns (>300%). Diversified rotations provided measurable productivity and economic gains in the absence of confounding management practices that have historically obscured the rotation effect. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Earth's Future)
    Abstract Uttar Pradesh, with a population of 237 million, is the largest agrarian state in India, located in the Indo‐Gangetic plains. Rice cultivation is widespread across all districts of Uttar Pradesh, which have varying climate regimes, irrigation infrastructures, crop management practices, and farm sizes. The state is characterized by different agroecological zones (AEZs) with semi‐arid to sub‐humid climates with significant variability in monsoon rainfall. In this study, the impact of climate change on Kharif‐season rice is estimated using crop‐climate scenarios in Uttar Pradesh. A process‐based Crop Simulation Model, Crop Estimation through Resource and Environment Synthesis‐Rice, was simulated with bias‐corrected and downscaled climate data for historical (1995–2014) and three future periods (the 2030s, 2050s, and 2090s) for two mitigation pathways (SSP2‐4.5 and SSP5‐8.5) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6. Phenology, irrigation amount, crop evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency were evaluated and assessed for all AEZs. Based on the ensemble of 16 climate models, rainfed rice yield increased in the AEZs of western Uttar Pradesh due to increased rainfall, while in eastern Uttar Pradesh yield decreased, under both shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). Irrigated rice yield decreased in all AEZs under both SSPs due to an increase in temperature and a decrease in the length of the growing period, with reductions of up to 20% by the 2090s. Irrigation requirements decreased from the 2030s to the 2090s due to increased rainfall and decreased crop evapotranspiration. Despite the projected increase in rainfed yield, the overall rice yield is expected to decrease in the future under both SSPs. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Agronomy Journal)
    null (Ed.)
    With over 65% of agronomic crops under no-till in Pennsylvania, herbicides are relied on for weed management. To lessen the environmental impact and selection pressure for herbicide resistance, we conducted a nine-year experiment to test herbicide reduction practices in a dairy crop rotation at Rock Springs, PA. The rotation included soybean (Glycine max L.) – corn (Zea mays L.) - 3-year alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) - canola (Brassica napus L.). The following practices were used to reduce herbicide inputs: i. banding residual herbicides over corn and soybean rows and using high-residue inter-row cultivation; ii. seeding a small grain companion crop with alfalfa; iii. plowing once in six years to terminate the perennial forage. These practices were compared with standard herbicide-based weed management (SH) in continuous no-till. We hypothesized: i. There would be more weed biomass in the reduced herbicide treatment (RH), ii. leading to more weeds in RH over time, but iii. the added weed pressure would not affect yield iv. or differences in net return. We sampled weed biomass in soybean, corn, and the first two forage years. In corn and soybean, weed biomass was often greater in RH than SH and increased over the years in the RH treatments. In the forage, weed biomass did not always differ between treatments. Yield and differences in net return were similar in most crops and years. Results suggest that weed management with reduced herbicide inputs supplemented with an integrated approach can be effective but may lead to more weeds over time. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Environmental Quality)
    Abstract The transition from conventional to more regenerative cropping systems can be economically risky due to variable transition period yields and unforeseen costs. We compared yields and economic returns for the first 3 years of the transition from a business as usual (BAU) conventional corn (Zea mays)–soybean (Glycine max) rotation to an aspirational (ASP) five‐crop (corn‐soybean‐winter wheat [Triticum aestivum]–winter canola [Brassica napus]‐forage) rotation in the Upper Midwest United States. Regenerative ASP cropping practices included the more diverse crop rotation, continuous no‐till, cover crops, precision inputs, and livestock (compost) integration. For the first two transition years, BAU corn yields were 8%–12% higher than ASP while in the third transition year, BAU corn yields were 5% lower. Soybean yields were similar for the first 2 years but higher in BAU in the third year due to an ASP pest outbreak. Equivalent yields for other ASP crops were lower than BAU in the first 2 years but similar in the third year except for canola, which suffered from slug damage. Whole‐system economic returns narrowed across years; by year three, whole system comparisons for the ASP corn and soybean entry points (corn‐soybean‐wheat and soybean‐wheat‐canola, respectively) showed equivalent economic returns for BAU and ASP, despite yield differences, owing largely to the ASP system's reduced operational costs. Overall findings suggest that early regenerative systems can be as profitable as conventional systems with careful attention to rotation entry points and inputs. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Agronomy Journal)
    Abstract Combining regenerative agriculture (RA) practices, such as cover cropping and no‐till, is increasingly promoted as a strategy to enhance soil health and climate resilience. However, their long‐term impacts on crop yield and yield stability remain uncertain. In this study, we assessed how RA practices influence sub‐field spatial variability of crop yield. We use yield stability zone categories (high, medium, low, or unstable) across 10 commercial farm fields in Michigan over a long period of time, 6–9 years before RA were implemented and 9–10 years after RA were implemented. We found that RA practices did not statistically impact maize (Zea maysL.; +9%) or soybean (Glycine max(L.) Merr.; –3%) yields, but RA increased whole field yield stability (decrease of CV from 27% to 17%) and the proportion of high‐yielding zones within the fields (+28%) due to the conversion of a substantial portion (21%) of prior unstable yielding areas of the field. Our results suggest that combining RA practices, such as no‐till and cover crops, can improve crop productivity and yield stability through the conversion of unstable zones into more stable areas of crop production, benefiting long‐term soil health and broader environmental goals in the Upper US Midwest. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email