More Like this

1. One size does not fit all: Understanding how faculty implement evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses

   https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE56618.2022.9962706  

   Brooks, Amy L.; Brown, Shane A.; Shekhar, Prateek; Heath, Kevin; Dominguez, Heydi; Knowles, Jeffrey (October 2022, Frontiers in Education Conference)

   This Work-In-Progress paper summarizes insights from early research activities related to a National Science Foundation (NSF) Improving Undergraduate STEM Education (IUSE) project investigating faculty adoption of evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs) in engineering classrooms. We are investigating EBIPs in engineering classrooms because, although instructors are interested and willing to adopt them, uptake by engineering faculty is lagging. To understand what is driving limited incorporation of EBIPs, our research objectives are anchored in our overlying goal of examining the lived experience of engineering faculty as they seek out and try innovative teaching practices (i.e., EBIPs) in their courses. This paper reports insights from early exploratory interviews with engineering faculty around their experiences with trying EBIPs. We report on general patterns observed during the early stages of our analysis of the interview transcripts with three engineering faculty (n = 3). We discuss how our analysis informs the next steps of our overarching investigation and briefly discuss the broader significance related to the context of faculty approaches for implementing EBIPs into their engineering courses. 

   more » « less
2. Board 359: Potential Interventions to Promote Engineering Technology Adoption among Faculty

   Jarvie-Eggart; Michelle E (June 2023, 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition)

   During the current 4th industrial revolution, technology is changing at an ever increasing pace [1]. Thus, it is essential that engineering educators continually adopt and teach new engineering technologies to both keep their technologies relevant for graduates entering industry, as well as to model lifelong learning for their students. In fact, ABET requires faculty to teach relevant tools for modern engineering, as well as equip students with life-long learning skills [2]. However, the time restrictions on faculty are well documented [3 - 4] and can make learning new technologies difficult or impossible. This poster summarizes the preliminary results of an NSF project funded through the Directorate for Engineering, Engineering Education and Centers. It builds on our research that identified potential interventions to promote faculty adoption of new engineering technologies. Participants at a workshop at the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference were presented with those preliminary results and asked to brainstorm ways the interventions could be implemented on their campuses, barriers to their implementation, and methods to overcome those barriers. The workshop was designed to provide peer review of the research results to determine if they would be considered relevant for institutions beyond the original research focus. An additional workshop goal was to expand on the existing set of proposed interventions by gathering ideas from faculty at other institutions. In this manner, the workshop both confirmed and expanded our data. The poster and this accompanying paper will present results of that brainstorming and will include proposed methods for reducing time constraints on faculty, support structures for faculty technology adoption, and human resources to support learning of new technologies. 

   more » « less
3. Factors that influence STEM faculty use of evidence-based instructional practices: An ecological model

   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281290  

   Sansom, Rebecca L.; Winters, Desiree M.; St. Clair, Bryn E.; West, Richard E.; Jensen, Jamie L. (January 2023, PLOS ONE)

   Dalby, Andrew R. (Ed.)

   Traditional teaching practices in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses have failed to support student success, causing many students to leave STEM fields and disproportionately affecting women and students of color. Although much is known about effective STEM teaching practices, many faculty continue to adhere to traditional methods, such as lecture. In this study, we investigated the factors that affect STEM faculty members’ instructional decisions about evidence-based instructional practices (EBIPs). We performed a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with faculty members from the Colleges of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering who took part in a professional development program to support the use of EBIPs by STEM faculty at the university. We used an ecological model to guide our investigation and frame the results. Faculty identified a variety of personal, social, and contextual factors that influenced their instructional decision-making. Personal factors included attitudes, beliefs, and self-efficacy. Social factors included the influence of students, colleagues, and administration. Contextual factors included resources, time, and student characteristics. These factors interact with each other in meaningful ways that highlight the hyper-local social contexts that exist within departments and sub-department cultures, the importance of positive feedback from students and colleagues when implementing EBIPs, and the need for support from the administration for faculty who are in the process of changing their teaching. 

   more » « less
4. Engineering Faculty Members’ Perceptions of University Makerspaces: Potential Affordances for Curriculum, Instructional Practices, and Student Learning

   Lenhart, C. st (October 2020, IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education)

   null (Ed.)

   We detail an exploratory study of faculty members’ perceptions of activities associated with undergraduate engineering programs in university-based makerspaces. Our study examines the affordances and constraints faculty perceive regarding teaching and learning in these spaces and, specifically, how makerspaces support engineering faculty members in accomplishing the goals and expectations they have for undergraduate students’ learning and development. We found that makerspaces inspired faculty members’ curricular and instructional innovations, including design of new courses and implementation of practices meant to result in more team-based and active learning. Faculty perceived student activities in makerspaces as fostering of student agency and development of engineering skills, knowledge, and affect. Faculty also identified concerns related to the teaching of engineering in these spaces, including the need to change their instructional practices to more fully engage students and to balance the sophisticated tools and resources with the rigor of completing complex engineering tasks. We use structuration theory to illuminate how faculty act, rationalize, and reflect on their teaching practices and goals in relation to structures present in university-based makerspace. Our study is intended to inform faculty and administrators working to engage students through interactions in makerspaces or similar innovations, and to consider how access to and impact of these structures support undergraduate engineering education. 

   more » « less
5. Engineering faculty perceptions of university makerspaces: Potential affordances for curriculum, instructional practices, and student learning.

   Lenhart, C.; Bouwma-Gearhart, J.; Villanueva, I.; & Nadelson, L. (January 2020, IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education)

   We detail an exploratory study of faculty members’ perceptions of activities associated with undergraduate engineering programs in university-based makerspaces. Our study examines the affordances and constraints faculty perceive regarding teaching and learning in these spaces and, specifically, how makerspaces support engineering faculty members in accomplishing the goals and expectations they have for undergraduate students’ learning and development. We found that makerspaces inspired faculty members’ curricular and instructional innovations, including design of new courses and implementation of practices meant to result in more team-based and active learning. Faculty perceived student activities in makerspaces as fostering of student agency and development of engineering skills, knowledge, and affect. Faculty also identified concerns related to the teaching of engineering in these spaces, including the need to change their instructional practices to more fully engage students and to balance the sophisticated tools and resources with the rigor of completing complex engineering tasks. We use structuration theory to illuminate how faculty act, rationalize, and reflect on their teaching practices and goals in relation to structures present in university-based makerspace. Our study is intended to inform faculty and administrators working to engage students through interactions in makerspaces or similar innovations, and to consider how access to and impact of these structures support undergraduate engineering education. 

   more » « less