An official website of the United States government
Abstract Base editors (BEs) hold great potential for medical applications of gene therapy. However, high precision base editing requires BEs that can discriminate between the target base and multiple bystander bases within a narrow active window (4 – 10 nucleotides). Here, to assist in the design of these optimized editors, we propose a discrete-state stochastic approach to build an analytical model that explicitly evaluates the probabilities of editing the target base and bystanders. Combined with all-atom molecular dynamic simulations, our model reproduces the experimental data of A3A-BE3 and its variants for targeting the “TC” motif and bystander editing. Analyzing this approach, we propose several general principles that can guide the design of BEs with a reduced bystander effect. These principles are then applied to design a series of point mutations at T218 position of A3G-BEs to further reduce its bystander editing. We verify experimentally that the new mutations provide different levels of stringency on reducing the bystander editing at different genomic loci, which is consistent with our theoretical model. Thus, our study provides a computational-aided platform to assist in the scientifically-based design of BEs with reduced bystander effects.
more »
« less
Dynamics of single-base editing: Theoretical analysis
Recent experimental advances led to the development of DNA base editors (BEs) with single-nucleotide precision, which is critical for future progress in various scientific and technological fields. The molecular mechanisms of single-base discrimination, however, remain poorly understood. Using a recently developed stochastic approach, we theoretically investigated the dynamics of single-base editing. More specifically, transient and mean times to edit “TC” motifs by cytosine BEs are explicitly evaluated for correct (target) and incorrect (bystander) locations on DNA. In addition, the effect of mutations on the dynamics of the single-base edition is also analyzed. It is found that for most ranges of parameters, it is possible to temporarily separate target and bystander products of base editing, supporting the idea of dynamic selectivity as a method of improving the precision of single-base editing. We conclude that to improve the efficiency of single-base editing, selecting the probability or selecting the time requires different strategies. Physical–chemical arguments to explain the observed dynamic properties are presented. The theoretical analysis clarifies some important aspects of the molecular mechanisms of selective base editing.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10512528
- Publisher / Repository:
- AIP Publishing
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Volume:
- 158
- Issue:
- 24
- ISSN:
- 0021-9606
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Cytosine base editors (CBEs) enable efficient cytidine-to-thymidine (C-to-T) substitutions at targeted loci without double-stranded breaks. However, current CBEs edit all Cs within their activity windows, generating undesired bystander mutations. In the most challenging circumstance, when a bystander C is adjacent to the targeted C , existing base editors fail to discriminate them and edit both Cs. To improve the precision of CBE, we identified and engineered the human APOBEC3G (A3G) deaminase; when fused to the Cas9 nickase, the resulting A3G-BEs exhibit selective editing of the second C in the 5′-C C -3′ motif in human cells. Our A3G-BEs could install a single disease-associated C-to-T substitution with high precision. The percentage of perfectly modified alleles is more than 6000-fold for disease correction and more than 600-fold for disease modeling compared with BE4max. On the basis of the two-cell embryo injection method and RNA sequencing analysis, our A3G-BEs showed minimum genome- and transcriptome-wide off-target effects, achieving high targeting fidelity.more » « less
-
Base editors (BEs) are genome editing agents that install point mutations with high efficiency and specificity. Due to their reliance on uracil and inosine DNA damage intermediates (rather than double-strand DNA breaks, or DSBs), it has been hypothesized that BEs rely on more ubiquitous DNA repair pathways than DSB-reliant genome editing methods, which require processes that are only active during certain phases of the cell cycle. We report here the first systematic study of the cell cycle-dependence of base editing using cell synchronization experiments. We find that nickase-derived BEs (which introduce DNA backbone nicks opposite the uracil or inosine base) function independently of the cell cycle, while non-nicking BEs are highly dependent on S-phase (DNA synthesis phase). We found that synchronization in G1 (growth phase) during the process of cytosine base editing causes significant increases in C•G to A•T “byproduct” introduction rates, which can be leveraged to discover new strategies for precise C•G to A•T base editing. We observe that endogenous expression levels of DNA damage repair pathways are sufficient to process base editing intermediates into desired editing outcomes, and the process of base editing does not significantly perturb transcription levels. Overall, our study provides mechanistic data demonstrating the robustness of nickase-derived BEs for performing genome editing across the cell cycle.more » « less
-
Abstract CRISPR-based DNA adenine base editors (ABEs) hold remarkable promises to address human genetic diseases caused by point mutations. ABEs were developed by combining CRISPR-Cas9 with a transfer RNA (tRNA) adenosine deaminase enzyme and through directed evolution, conferring the ability to deaminate DNA. However, the molecular mechanisms driving the efficient DNA deamination in the evolved ABEs remain unresolved. Here, extensive molecular simulations and biochemical experiments reveal the biophysical basis behind the astonishing base editing efficiency of ABE8e, the most efficient ABE to date. We demonstrate that the ABE8e’s DNA deaminase domain, TadA8e, forms remarkably stable dimers compared to its tRNA-deaminating progenitor and that the strength of TadA dimerization is crucial for DNA deamination. The TadA8e dimer forms robust interactions involving its R98 and R129 residues, the RuvC domain of Cas9 and the DNA. These locking interactions are exclusive to ABE8e, distinguishing it from its predecessor, ABE7.10, and are indispensable to boost DNA deamination. Additionally, we identify three critical residues that drive the evolution of ABE8e toward improved base editing by balancing the enzyme’s activity and stability, reinforcing the TadA8e dimer and improving the ABE8e’s functionality. These insights offer new directions to engineer superior ABEs, advancing the design of safer precision genome editing tools.more » « less
-
CRISPR-Cas–guided base editors convert A•T to G•C, or C•G to T•A, in cellular DNA for precision genome editing. To understand the molecular basis for DNA adenosine deamination by adenine base editors (ABEs), we determined a 3.2-angstrom resolution cryo–electron microscopy structure of ABE8e in a substrate-bound state in which the deaminase domain engages DNA exposed within the CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex. Kinetic and structural data suggest that ABE8e catalyzes DNA deamination up to ~1100-fold faster than earlier ABEs because of mutations that stabilize DNA substrates in a constrained, transfer RNA–like conformation. Furthermore, ABE8e’s accelerated DNA deamination suggests a previously unobserved transient DNA melting that may occur during double-stranded DNA surveillance by CRISPR-Cas9. These results explain ABE8e-mediated base-editing outcomes and inform the future design of base editors.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0157193
