Abstract Sea level rise and more frequent and larger storms will increase saltwater flooding in coastal terrestrial ecosystems, altering soil‐atmosphere CO2and CH4exchange. Understanding these impacts is particularly relevant in high‐latitude coastal soils that hold large carbon stocks but where the interaction of salinity and moisture on greenhouse gas flux remains unexplored. Here, we quantified the effects of salinity and moisture on CO2and CH4fluxes from low‐Arctic coastal soils from three landscape positions (two Wetlands and Upland Tundra) distinguished by elevation, flooding frequency, soil characteristics, and vegetation. We used a full factorial laboratory incubation experiment of three soil moisture levels (40%, 70%, or 100% saturation) and four salinity levels (freshwater, 3, 6, or 12 ppt). Salinity and soil moisture were important controls on CO2and CH4emissions across all landscape positions. In saturated soil, CO2emissions increased with salinity in the lower elevation landscape positions but not in the Upland Tundra soil. Saturated soil was necessary for large CH4emissions. CH4emissions were greatest with low salinity, or after 11 weeks of incubation when SO42−was exhausted allowing for methanogenesis as the dominant mechanism of anaerobic respiration. In partially saturated soil, greater salinity suppressed CO2production in all soils. CH4fluxes were overall quite low, but increased between 3 and 6 ppt in the Tundra. In the future, a small increase in floodwater salinity may increase CO2production while suppressing CH4production; however, where water is impounded, CH4production could become large, particularly in the landscapes most likely to flood.
more »
« less
Response of CO 2 and CH 4 emissions from Arctic tundra soils to a multifactorial manipulation of water table, temperature and thaw depth
Abstract Significant uncertainties persist concerning how Arctic soil tundra carbon emission responds to environmental changes. In this study, 24 cores were sampled from drier (high centre polygons and rims) and wetter (low centre polygons and troughs) permafrost tundra ecosystems. We examined how soil CO2and CH4fluxes responded to laboratory-based manipulations of soil temperature (and associated thaw depth) and water table depth, representing current and projected conditions in the Arctic. Similar soil CO2respiration rates occurred in both the drier and the wetter sites, suggesting that a significant proportion of soil CO2emission occurs via anaerobic respiration under water-saturated conditions in these Arctic tundra ecosystems. In the absence of vegetation, soil CO2respiration rates decreased sharply within the first 7 weeks of the experiment, while CH4emissions remained stable for the entire 26 weeks of the experiment. These patterns suggest that soil CO2emission is more related to plant input than CH4production and emission. The stable and substantial CH4emission observed over the entire course of the experiment suggests that temperature limitations, rather than labile carbon limitations, play a predominant role in CH4production in deeper soil layers. This is likely due to the presence of a substantial source of labile carbon in these carbon-rich soils. The small soil temperature difference (a median difference of 1 °C) and a more substantial thaw depth difference (a median difference of 6 cm) between the high and low temperature treatments resulted in a non-significant difference between soil CO2and CH4emissions. Although hydrology continued to be the primary factor influencing CH4emissions, these emissions remained low in the drier ecosystem, even with a water table at the surface. This result suggests the potential absence of a methanogenic microbial community in high-centre polygon and rim ecosystems. Overall, our results suggest that the temperature increases reported for these Arctic regions are not responsible for increases in carbon losses. Instead, it is the changes in hydrology that exert significant control over soil CO2and CH4emissions.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1932900
- PAR ID:
- 10513489
- Editor(s):
- Goetz, Scott
- Publisher / Repository:
- IOP Science
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Environmental Research: Ecology
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 2752-664X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 045003
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Boreal‐Arctic regions are key stores of organic carbon (C) and play a major role in the greenhouse gas balance of high‐latitude ecosystems. The carbon‐climate (C‐climate) feedback potential of northern high‐latitude ecosystems remains poorly understood due to uncertainty in temperature and precipitation controls on carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake and the decomposition of soil C into CO2and methane (CH4) fluxes. While CH4fluxes account for a smaller component of the C balance, the climatic impact of CH4outweighs CO2(28–34 times larger global warming potential on a 100‐year scale), highlighting the need to jointly resolve the climatic sensitivities of both CO2and CH4. Here, we jointly constrain a terrestrial biosphere model with in situ CO2and CH4flux observations at seven eddy covariance sites using a data‐model integration approach to resolve the integrated environmental controls on land‐atmosphere CO2and CH4exchanges in Alaska. Based on the combined CO2and CH4flux responses to climate variables, we find that 1970‐present climate trends will induce positive C‐climate feedback at all tundra sites, and negative C‐climate feedback at the boreal and shrub fen sites. The positive C‐climate feedback at the tundra sites is predominantly driven by increased CH4emissions while the negative C‐climate feedback at the boreal site is predominantly driven by increased CO2uptake (80% from decreased heterotrophic respiration, and 20% from increased photosynthesis). Our study demonstrates the need for joint observational constraints on CO2and CH4biogeochemical processes—and their associated climatic sensitivities—for resolving the sign and magnitude of high‐latitude ecosystem C‐climate feedback in the coming decades.more » « less
-
Abstract Arctic wetlands are known methane (CH4) emitters but recent studies suggest that the Arctic CH4sink strength may be underestimated. Here we explore the capacity of well-drained Arctic soils to consume atmospheric CH4using >40,000 hourly flux observations and spatially distributed flux measurements from 4 sites and 14 surface types. While consumption of atmospheric CH4occurred at all sites at rates of 0.092 ± 0.011 mgCH4 m−2 h−1(mean ± s.e.), CH4uptake displayed distinct diel and seasonal patterns reflecting ecosystem respiration. Combining in situ flux data with laboratory investigations and a machine learning approach, we find biotic drivers to be highly important. Soil moisture outweighed temperature as an abiotic control and higher CH4uptake was linked to increased availability of labile carbon. Our findings imply that soil drying and enhanced nutrient supply will promote CH4uptake by Arctic soils, providing a negative feedback to global climate change.more » « less
-
Abstract In the Arctic waterbodies are abundant and rapid thaw of permafrost is destabilizing the carbon cycle and changing hydrology. It is particularly important to quantify and accurately scale aquatic carbon emissions in arctic ecosystems. Recently available high-resolution remote sensing datasets capture the physical characteristics of arctic landscapes at unprecedented spatial resolution. We demonstrate how machine learning models can capitalize on these spatial datasets to greatly improve accuracy when scaling waterbody CO2and CH4fluxes across the YK Delta of south-west AK. We found that waterbody size and contour were strong predictors for aquatic CO2emissions, attributing greater than two-thirds of the influence to the scaling model. Small ponds (<0.001 km2) were hotspots of emissions, contributing fluxes several times their relative area, but were less than 5% of the total carbon budget. Small to medium lakes (0.001–0.1 km2) contributed the majority of carbon emissions from waterbodies. Waterbody CH4emissions were predicted by a combination of wetland landcover and related drivers, as well as watershed hydrology, and waterbody surface reflectance related to chromophoric dissolved organic matter. When compared to our machine learning approach, traditional scaling methods that did not account for relevant landscape characteristics overestimated waterbody CO2and CH4emissions by 26%–79% and 8%–53% respectively. This study demonstrates the importance of an integrated terrestrial-aquatic approach to improving estimates and uncertainty when scaling C emissions in the arctic.more » « less
-
Abstract Environmental changes, such as climate warming and higher herbivory pressure, are altering the carbon balance of Arctic ecosystems; yet, how these drivers modify the carbon balance among different habitats remains uncertain. This hampers our ability to predict changes in the carbon sink strength of tundra ecosystems. We investigated how spring goose grubbing and summer warming—two key environmental‐change drivers in the Arctic—alter CO2fluxes in three tundra habitats varying in soil moisture and plant‐community composition. In a full‐factorial experiment in high‐Arctic Svalbard, we simulated grubbing and warming over two years and determined summer net ecosystem exchange (NEE) alongside its components: gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and ecosystem respiration (ER). After two years, we found net CO2uptake to be suppressed by both drivers depending on habitat. CO2uptake was reduced by warming in mesic habitats, by warming and grubbing in moist habitats, and by grubbing in wet habitats. In mesic habitats, warming stimulated ER (+75%) more than GEP (+30%), leading to a 7.5‐fold increase in their CO2source strength. In moist habitats, grubbing decreased GEP and ER by ~55%, while warming increased them by ~35%, with no changes in summer‐long NEE. Nevertheless, grubbing offset peak summer CO2uptake and warming led to a twofold increase in late summer CO2source strength. In wet habitats, grubbing reduced GEP (−40%) more than ER (−30%), weakening their CO2sink strength by 70%. One‐year CO2‐flux responses were similar to two‐year responses, and the effect of simulated grubbing was consistent with that of natural grubbing. CO2‐flux rates were positively related to aboveground net primary productivity and temperature. Net ecosystem CO2uptake started occurring above ~70% soil moisture content, primarily due to a decline in ER. Herein, we reveal that key environmental‐change drivers—goose grubbing by decreasing GEP more than ER and warming by enhancing ER more than GEP—consistently suppress net tundra CO2uptake, although their relative strength differs among habitats. By identifying how and where grubbing and higher temperatures alter CO2fluxes across the heterogeneous Arctic landscape, our results have implications for predicting the tundra carbon balance under increasing numbers of geese in a warmer Arctic.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

