skip to main content


This content will become publicly available on January 5, 2025

Title: Automatic Parallelism Management

On any modern computer architecture today, parallelism comes with a modest cost, born from the creation and management of threads or tasks. Today, programmers battle this cost by manually optimizing/tuning their codes to minimize the cost of parallelism without harming its benefit, performance. This is a difficult battle: programmers must reason about architectural constant factors hidden behind layers of software abstractions, including thread schedulers and memory managers, and their impact on performance, also at scale. In languages that support higher-order functions, the battle hardens: higher order functions can make it difficult, if not impossible, to reason about the cost and benefits of parallelism.

Motivated by these challenges and the numerous advantages of high-level languages, we believe that it has become essential to manage parallelism automatically so as to minimize its cost and maximize its benefit. This is a challenging problem, even when considered on a case-by-case, application-specific basis. But if a solution were possible, then it could combine the many correctness benefits of high-level languages with performance by managing parallelism without the programmer effort needed to ensure performance. This paper proposes techniques for such automatic management of parallelism by combining static (compilation) and run-time techniques. Specifically, we consider the Parallel ML language with task parallelism, and describe a compiler pipeline that embeds potential parallelism directly into the call-stack and avoids the cost of task creation by default. We then pair this compilation pipeline with a run-time system that dynamically converts potential parallelism into actual parallel tasks. Together, the compiler and run-time system guarantee that the cost of parallelism remains low without losing its benefit. We prove that our techniques have no asymptotic impact on the work and span of parallel programs and thus preserve their asymptotic properties. We implement the proposed techniques by extending the MPL compiler for Parallel ML and show that it can eliminate the burden of manual optimization while delivering good practical performance.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
2115104 2107241
NSF-PAR ID:
10515496
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ACM
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
Volume:
8
Issue:
POPL
ISSN:
2475-1421
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1118 to 1149
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Modern programming languages offer special syntax and semantics for logical fork-join parallelism in the form of parallel loops, allowing them to be nested, e.g., a parallel loop within another parallel loop. This expressiveness comes at a price, however: on modern multicore systems, realizing logical parallelism results in overheads due to the creation and management of parallel tasks, which can wipe out the benefits of parallelism. Today, we expect application programmers to cope with it by manually tuning and optimizing their code. Such tuning requires programmers to reason about architectural factors hidden behind layers of software abstractions, such as task scheduling and load balancing. Managing these factors is particularly challenging when workloads are irregular because their performance is input-sensitive. This paper presents HBC, the first compiler that translates C/C++ programs with high-level, fork-join constructs (e.g., OpenMP) to binaries capable of automatically controlling the cost of parallelism and dealing with irregular, input-sensitive workloads. The basis of our approach is Heartbeat Scheduling, a recent proposal for automatic granularity control, which is backed by formal guarantees on performance. HBC binaries outperform OpenMP binaries for workloads for which even entirely manual solutions struggle to find the right balance between parallelism and its costs. 
    more » « less
  2. Although functional programming languages simplify writing safe parallel programs by helping programmers to avoid data races, they have traditionally delivered poor performance. Recent work improved performance by using a hierarchical memory architecture that allows processors to allocate and reclaim memory independently without any synchronization, solving thus the key performance challenge afflicting functional programs. The approach, however, restricts mutation, or memory effects, so as to ensure "disentanglement", a low-level memory property that guarantees independence between different heaps in the hierarchy. This paper proposes techniques for supporting entanglement and for allowing functional programs to use mutation at will. Our techniques manage entanglement by distinguishing between disentangled and entangled objects and shielding disentangled objects from the cost of entanglement management. We present a semantics that formalizes entanglement as a property at the granularity of memory objects, and define several cost metrics to reason about and bound the time and space cost of entanglement. We present an implementation of the techniques by extending the MPL compiler for Parallel ML. The extended compiler supports all features of the Parallel ML language, including unrestricted effects. Our experiments using a variety of benchmarks show that MPL incurs a small time and space overhead compared to sequential runs, scales well, and is competitive with languages such as C++, Go, Java, OCaml. These results show that our techniques can marry the safety benefits of functional programming with performance. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Because of its many desirable properties, such as its ability to control effects and thus potentially disastrous race conditions, functional programming offers a viable approach to programming modern multicore computers. Over the past decade several parallel functional languages, typically based on dialects of ML and Haskell, have been developed. These languages, however, have traditionally underperformed procedural languages (such as C and Java). The primary reason for this is their hunger for memory, which only grows with parallelism, causing traditional memory management techniques to buckle under increased demand for memory. Recent work opened a new angle of attack on this problem by identifying a memory property of determinacy-race-free parallel programs, called disentanglement, which limits the knowledge of concurrent computations about each other’s memory allocations. The work has showed some promise in delivering good time scalability. In this paper, we present provably space-efficient automatic memory management techniques for determinacy-race-free functional parallel programs, allowing both pure and imperative programs where memory may be destructively updated. We prove that for a program with sequential live memory of R * , any P -processor garbage-collected parallel run requires at most O ( R * · P ) memory. We also prove a work bound of O ( W + R * P ) for P -processor executions, accounting also for the cost of garbage collection. To achieve these results, we integrate thread scheduling with memory management. The idea is to coordinate memory allocation and garbage collection with thread scheduling decisions so that each processor can allocate memory without synchronization and independently collect a portion of memory by consulting a collection policy, which we formulate. The collection policy is fully distributed and does not require communicating with other processors. We show that the approach is practical by implementing it as an extension to the MPL compiler for Parallel ML. Our experimental results confirm our theoretical bounds and show that the techniques perform and scale well. 
    more » « less
  4. Compositional compiler verification is a difficult problem that focuses on separate compilation of program components with possibly different verified compilers. Logical relations are widely used in proving correctness of program transformations in higher-order languages; however, they do not scale to compositional verification of multi-pass compilers due to their lack of transitivity. The only known technique to apply to compositional verification of multi-pass compilers for higher-order languages is parametric inter-language simulations (PILS), which is however significantly more complicated than traditional proof techniques for compiler correctness. In this paper, we present a novel verification framework for lightweight compositional compiler correctness . We demonstrate that by imposing the additional restriction that program components are compiled by pipelines that go through the same sequence of intermediate representations , logical relation proofs can be transitively composed in order to derive an end-to-end compositional specification for multi-pass compiler pipelines. Unlike traditional logical-relation frameworks, our framework supports divergence preservation—even when transformations reduce the number of program steps. We achieve this by parameterizing our logical relations with a pair of relational invariants . We apply this technique to verify a multi-pass, optimizing middle-end pipeline for CertiCoq, a compiler from Gallina (Coq’s specification language) to C. The pipeline optimizes and closure-converts an untyped functional intermediate language (ANF or CPS) to a subset of that language without nested functions, which can be easily code-generated to low-level languages. Notably, our pipeline performs more complex closure-allocation optimizations than the state of the art in verified compilation. Using our novel verification framework, we prove an end-to-end theorem for our pipeline that covers both termination and divergence and applies to whole-program and separate compilation, even when different modules are compiled with different optimizations. Our results are mechanized in the Coq proof assistant. 
    more » « less
  5. Symbolic execution is a powerful program analysis and testing technique. Symbolic execution engines are usually implemented as interpreters, and the induced interpretation over-head can dramatically inhibit performance. Alternatively, implementation choices based on instrumentation provide a limited ability to transform programs. However, the use of compilation and code generation techniques beyond simple instrumentation remains underexplored for engine construction, leaving potential performance gains untapped. In this paper, we show how to tap some of these gains using sophisticated compilation techniques: We present Gensym, an optimizing symbolic-execution compiler that generates symbolic code which explores paths and generates tests in parallel. The key insight of GensYmis to compile symbolic execution tasks into cooperative concurrency via continuation-passing style, which further enables efficient parallelism. The design and implementation of Gensym is based on partial evaluation and generative programming techniques, which make it high-level and performant at the same time. We compare the performance of Gensym against the prior symbolic-execution compiler LLSC and the state-of-the-art symbolic interpreter KLEE. The results show an average 4.6× speedup for sequential execution and 9.4× speedup for parallel execution on 20 benchmark programs. 
    more » « less