An official website of the United States government
Since malware has caused serious damages and evolving threats to computer and Internet users, its detection is of great interest to both anti-malware industry and researchers. In recent years, machine learning-based systems have been successfully deployed in malware detection, in which different kinds of classifiers are built based on the training samples using different feature representations. Unfortunately, as classifiers become more widely deployed, the incentive for defeating them increases. In this paper, we explore the adversarial machine learning in malware detection. In particular, on the basis of a learning-based classifier with the input of Windows Application Programming Interface (API) calls extracted from the Portable Executable (PE) files, we present an effective evasion attack model (named EvnAttack) by considering different contributions of the features to the classification problem. To be resilient against the evasion attack, we further propose a secure-learning paradigm for malware detection (named SecDefender), which not only adopts classifier retraining technique but also introduces the security regularization term which considers the evasion cost of feature manipulations by attackers to enhance the system security. Comprehensive experimental results on the real sample collections from Comodo Cloud Security Center demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed methods.
more »
« less
EAGLE: Evasion Attacks Guided by Local Explanations against Android Malware Classification
With machine learning techniques widely used to automate Android malware detection, it is important to investigate the robustness of these methods against evasion attacks. A recent work has proposed a novel problem-space attack on Android malware classifiers, where adversarial examples are generated by transforming Android malware samples while satisfying practical constraints. Aimed to address its limitations, we propose a new attack called EAGLE (Evasion Attacks Guided by Local Explanations), whose key idea is to leverage local explanations to guide the search for adversarial examples. We present a generic algorithmic framework for EAGLE attacks, which can be customized with specific feature increase and decrease operations to evade Android malware classifiers trained on different types of count features. We overcome practical challenges in implementing these operations for four different types of Android malware classifiers. Using two Android malware datasets, our results show that EAGLE attacks can be highly effective at finding functionable adversarial examples. We study the attack transferrability of malware variants created by EAGLE attacks across classifiers built with different classification models or trained on different types of count features. Our research further demonstrates that ensemble classifiers trained from multiple types of count features are not immune to EAGLE attacks. We also discuss possible defense mechanisms against EAGLE attacks.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1943079
- PAR ID:
- 10516789
- Publisher / Repository:
- IEEE
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
- ISSN:
- 1545-5971
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 18
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Malware, mobile security, adversarial machine learning
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Machine learning-based security detection models have become prevalent in modern malware and intrusion detection systems. However, previous studies show that such models are susceptible to adversarial evasion attacks. In this type of attack, inputs (i.e., adversarial examples) are specially crafted by intelligent malicious adversaries, with the aim of being misclassified by existing state-of-the-art models (e.g., deep neural networks). Once the attackers can fool a classifier to think that a malicious input is actually benign, they can render a machine learning-based malware or intrusion detection system ineffective. Objective To help security practitioners and researchers build a more robust model against non-adaptive, white-box and non-targeted adversarial evasion attacks through the idea of ensemble model. Method We propose an approach called Omni, the main idea of which is to explore methods that create an ensemble of “unexpected models”; i.e., models whose control hyperparameters have a large distance to the hyperparameters of an adversary’s target model, with which we then make an optimized weighted ensemble prediction. Results In studies with five types of adversarial evasion attacks (FGSM, BIM, JSMA, DeepFool and Carlini-Wagner) on five security datasets (NSL-KDD, CIC-IDS-2017, CSE-CIC-IDS2018, CICAndMal2017 and the Contagio PDF dataset), we show Omni is a promising approach as a defense strategy against adversarial attacks when compared with other baseline treatments Conclusions When employing ensemble defense against adversarial evasion attacks, we suggest to create ensemble with unexpected models that are distant from the attacker’s expected model (i.e., target model) through methods such as hyperparameter optimization.more » « less
-
Malicious software (malware) is a major cyber threat that has to be tackled with Machine Learning (ML) techniques because millions of new malware examples are injected into cyberspace on a daily basis. However, ML is vulnerable to attacks known as adversarial examples. In this article, we survey and systematize the field of Adversarial Malware Detection (AMD) through the lens of a unified conceptual framework of assumptions, attacks, defenses, and security properties. This not only leads us to map attacks and defenses to partial order structures, but also allows us to clearly describe the attack-defense arms race in the AMD context. We draw a number of insights, including: knowing the defender’s feature set is critical to the success of transfer attacks; the effectiveness of practical evasion attacks largely depends on the attacker’s freedom in conducting manipulations in the problem space; knowing the attacker’s manipulation set is critical to the defender’s success; and the effectiveness of adversarial training depends on the defender’s capability in identifying the most powerful attack. We also discuss a number of future research directions.more » « less
-
Defenses against adversarial examples, such as adversarial training, are typically tailored to a single perturbation type (e.g., small ℓ∞-noise). For other perturbations, these defenses offer no guarantees and, at times, even increase the model’s vulnerability. Our aim is to understand the reasons underlying this robustness trade-off, and to train models that are simultaneously robust to multiple perturbation types. We prove that a trade-off in robustness to different types of ℓp-bounded and spatial perturbations must exist in a natural and simple statistical setting. We corroborate our formal analysis by demonstrating similar robustness trade-offs on MNIST and CIFAR10. We propose new multi-perturbation adversarial training schemes, as well as an efficient attack for the ℓ1-norm, and use these to show that models trained against multiple attacks fail to achieve robustness competitive with that of models trained on each attack individually. In particular, we find that adversarial training with first-order ℓ∞, ℓ1 and ℓ2 attacks on MNIST achieves merely 50% robust accuracy, partly because of gradient-masking. Finally, we propose affine attacks that linearly interpolate between perturbation types and further degrade the accuracy of adversarially trained models.more » « less
-
Machine learning (ML) models have shown promise in classifying raw executable files (binaries) as malicious or benign with high accuracy. This has led to the increasing influence of ML-based classification methods in academic and real-world malware detection, a critical tool in cybersecurity. However, previous work provoked caution by creating variants of malicious binaries, referred to as adversarial examples, that are transformed in a functionality-preserving way to evade detection. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of using adversarial training methods to create malware-classification models that are more robust to some state-of-the-art attacks. To train our most robust models, we significantly increase the efficiency and scale of creating adversarial examples to make adversarial training practical, which has not been done before in raw-binary malware detectors. We then analyze the effects of varying the length of adversarial training, as well as analyze the effects of training with various types of attacks. We find that data augmentation does not deter state-of-the-art attacks, but that using a generic gradient-guided method, used in other discrete domains, does improve robustness. We also show that in most cases, models can be made more robust to malware-domain attacks by adversarially training them with lower-effort versions of the same attack. In the best case, we reduce one state-of-the-art attack’s success rate from 90% to 5%. We also find that training with some types of attacks can increase robustness to other types of attacks. Finally, we discuss insights gained from our results, and how they can be used to more effectively train robust malware detectors.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2023.3324265
