An official website of the United States government
An approach combining signal detection theory and precise 3D reconstructions from serial section electron microscopy (3DEM) was used to investigate synaptic plasticity and information storage capacity at medial perforant path synapses in adult hippocampal dentate gyrus in vivo. Induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) markedly increased the frequencies of both small and large spines measured 30 minutes later. This bidirectional expansion resulted in heterosynaptic counterbalancing of total synaptic area per unit length of granule cell dendrite. Control hemispheres exhibited 6.5 distinct spine sizes for 2.7 bits of storage capacity while LTP resulted in 12.9 distinct spine sizes (3.7 bits). In contrast, control hippocampal CA1 synapses exhibited 4.7 bits with much greater synaptic precision than either control or potentiated dentate gyrus synapses. Thus, synaptic plasticity altered total capacity, yet hippocampal subregions differed dramatically in their synaptic information storage capacity, reflecting their diverse functions and activation histories.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on April 23, 2025
Synaptic Information Storage Capacity Measured With Information Theory
Abstract Variation in the strength of synapses can be quantified by measuring the anatomical properties of synapses. Quantifying precision of synaptic plasticity is fundamental to understanding information storage and retrieval in neural circuits. Synapses from the same axon onto the same dendrite have a common history of coactivation, making them ideal candidates for determining the precision of synaptic plasticity based on the similarity of their physical dimensions. Here, the precision and amount of information stored in synapse dimensions were quantified with Shannon information theory, expanding prior analysis that used signal detection theory (Bartol et al., 2015). The two methods were compared using dendritic spine head volumes in the middle of the stratum radiatum of hippocampal area CA1 as well-defined measures of synaptic strength. Information theory delineated the number of distinguishable synaptic strengths based on nonoverlapping bins of dendritic spine head volumes. Shannon entropy was applied to measure synaptic information storage capacity (SISC) and resulted in a lower bound of 4.1 bits and upper bound of 4.59 bits of information based on 24 distinguishable sizes. We further compared the distribution of distinguishable sizes and a uniform distribution using Kullback-Leibler divergence and discovered that there was a nearly uniform distribution of spine head volumes across the sizes, suggesting optimal use of the distinguishable values. Thus, SISC provides a new analytical measure that can be generalized to probe synaptic strengths and capacity for plasticity in different brain regions of different species and among animals raised in different conditions or during learning. How brain diseases and disorders affect the precision of synaptic plasticity can also be probed.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10517093
- Publisher / Repository:
- Neurol Computation
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Neural Computation
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 5
- ISSN:
- 0899-7667
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 781 to 802
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Dendritic spines are small subcompartments that protrude from the dendrites of neurons and are important for signaling activity and synaptic communication. These subcompartments have been characterized to have different shapes. While it is known that these shapes are associated with spine function, the specific nature of these shape–function relationships is not well understood. In this work, we systematically investigated the relationship between the shape and size of both the spine head and spine apparatus, a specialized endoplasmic reticulum compartment within the spine head, in modulating rapid calcium dynamics using mathematical modeling. We developed a spatial multicompartment reaction–diffusion model of calcium dynamics in three dimensions with various flux sources, including N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), voltage-sensitive calcium channels (VSCCs), and different ion pumps on the plasma membrane. Using this model, we make several important predictions. First, the volume to surface area ratio of the spine regulates calcium dynamics. Second, membrane fluxes impact calcium dynamics temporally and spatially in a nonlinear fashion. Finally, the spine apparatus can act as a physical buffer for calcium by acting as a sink and rescaling the calcium concentration. These predictions set the stage for future experimental investigations of calcium dynamics in dendritic spines.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Synapses are often precisely organized on dendritic arbors, yet the role of synaptic topography in dendritic integration remains poorly understood. Utilizing electron microscopy (EM) connectomics we investigate synaptic topography inDrosophila melanogasterlooming circuits, focusing on retinotopically tuned visual projection neurons (VPNs) that synapse onto descending neurons (DNs). Synapses of a given VPN type project to non-overlapping regions on DN dendrites. Within these spatially constrained clusters, synapses are not retinotopically organized, but instead adopt near random distributions. To investigate how this organization strategy impacts DN integration, we developed multicompartment models of DNs fitted to experimental data and using precise EM morphologies and synapse locations. We find that DN dendrite morphologies normalize EPSP amplitudes of individual synaptic inputs and that near random distributions of synapses ensure linear encoding of synapse numbers from individual VPNs. These findings illuminate how synaptic topography influences dendritic integration and suggest that linear encoding of synapse numbers may be a default strategy established through connectivity and passive neuron properties, upon which active properties and plasticity can then tune as needed.more » « less
-
Synapses form trillions of connections in the brain. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are cellular mechanisms vital for learning that modify the strength and structure of synapses. Three-dimensional reconstruction from serial section electron microscopy reveals three distinct pre- to post-synaptic arrangements: strong active zones (AZs) with tightly docked vesicles, weak AZs with loose or non-docked vesicles, and nascent zones (NZs) with a postsynaptic density but no presynaptic vesicles. Importantly, LTP can be temporarily saturated preventing further increases in synaptic strength. At the onset of LTP, vesicles are recruited to NZs, converting them to AZs. During recovery of LTP from saturation (1–4 h), new NZs form, especially on spines where AZs are most enlarged by LTP. Sentinel spines contain smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER), have the largest synapses and form clusters with smaller spines lacking SER after LTP recovers. We propose a model whereby NZ plasticity provides synapse-specific AZ expansion during LTP and loss of weak AZs that drive synapse shrinkage during LTD. Spine clusters become functionally engaged during LTP or disassembled during LTD. Saturation of LTP or LTD probably acts to protect recently formed memories from ongoing plasticity and may account for the advantage of spaced over massed learning. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Long-term potentiation: 50 years on’.more » « less
-
AMPA receptors (AMPARs) mediate the majority of fast excitatory transmission in the brain. Regulation of AMPAR levels at synapses controls synaptic strength and underlies information storage and processing. Many proteins interact with the intracellular domain of AMPARs to regulate their trafficking and synaptic clustering. However, a growing number of extracellular factors important for glutamatergic synapse development, maturation and function have emerged that can also regulate synaptic AMPAR levels. This mini-review highlights extracellular protein factors that regulate AMPAR trafficking to control synapse development and plasticity. Some of these factors regulate AMPAR clustering and mobility by interacting with the extracellular N-terminal domain of AMPARs whereas others regulate AMPAR trafficking indirectly via their respective signaling receptors. While several of these factors are secreted from neurons, others are released from non-neuronal cells such as glia and muscle. Although it is apparent that secreted factors can act locally on neurons near their sites of release to coordinate individual synapses, it is less clear if they can diffuse over longer ranges to coordinate related synapses within a circuit or region of the brain. Given that there are hundreds of factors that can be secreted from neuronal and non-neuronal cells, it will not be surprising if more extracellular factors that modulate AMPARs and glutamatergic synapses are discovered. Many open questions remain including where and when the factors are expressed, what regulates their secretion from different cell types, what controls their diffusion, stability, and range of action, and how their cognate receptors influence intracellular signaling to control AMPAR trafficking.more » « less
