This content will become publicly available on July 3, 2025
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10521261
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Nature
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Selecta Mathematica
- Volume:
- 30
- ISSN:
- 1022-1824
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 66
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity Matrix Schubert variety Grothendieck polynomial Major index Weak Bruhat order Rajchgot index
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Other: pdf
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
null (Ed.)Abstract We investigate the long-standing problem of finding a combinatorial rule for the Schubert structure constants in the $K$-theory of flag varieties (in type $A$). The Grothendieck polynomials of A. Lascoux–M.-P. Schützenberger (1982) serve as polynomial representatives for $K$-theoretic Schubert classes; however no positive rule for their multiplication is known in general. We contribute a new basis for polynomials (in $n$ variables) which we call glide polynomials, and give a positive combinatorial formula for the expansion of a Grothendieck polynomial in this basis. We then provide a positive combinatorial Littlewood–Richardson rule for expanding a product of Grothendieck polynomials in the glide basis. Our techniques easily extend to the $\beta$-Grothendieck polynomials of S. Fomin–A. Kirillov (1994), representing classes in connective $K$-theory, and we state our results in this more general context.more » « less
-
Abstract We compute the Euler characteristic of the structure sheaf of the Brill–Noether locus of linear series with special vanishing at up to two marked points. When the Brill–Noether number $\rho $ is zero, we recover the Castelnuovo formula for the number of special linear series on a general curve; when $\rho =1$, we recover the formulas of Eisenbud-Harris, Pirola, and Chan–Martín–Pflueger–Teixidor for the arithmetic genus of a Brill–Noether curve of special divisors. These computations are obtained as applications of a new determinantal formula for the $K$-theory class of certain degeneracy loci. Our degeneracy locus formula also specializes to new determinantal expressions for the double Grothendieck polynomials corresponding to 321-avoiding permutations and gives double versions of the flagged skew Grothendieck polynomials recently introduced by Matsumura. Our result extends the formula of Billey–Jockusch–Stanley expressing Schubert polynomials for 321-avoiding permutations as generating functions for flagged skew tableaux.more » « less
-
We give a new operator formula for Grothendieck polynomials that generalizes Magyar’s Demazure operator formula for Schubert polynomials. Our proofs are purely combinatorial, contrasting with the geometric and representation theoretic tools used by Magyar. We apply our formula to prove a necessary divisibility condition for a monomial to appear in a given Grothendieck polynomial.more » « less
-
Dan Abramovich (Ed.)
Let
be a noetherian connected graded algebra. We introduce and study homological invariants that are weighted sums of the homological and internal degrees of cochain complexes of graded -modules, providing weighted versions of Castelnuovo–Mumford regularity, Tor-regularity, Artin–Schelter regularity, and concavity. In some cases an invariant (such as Tor-regularity) that is infinite can be replaced with a weighted invariant that is finite, and several homological invariants of complexes can be expressed as weighted homological regularities. We prove a few weighted homological identities some of which unify different classical homological identities and produce interesting new ones. -
Abstract Grothendieck polynomials were introduced by Lascoux and Schützenberger and play an important role in K-theoretic Schubert calculus. In this paper, we give a new definition of double stable Grothendieck polynomials based on an iterated residue operation. We illustrate the power of our definition by calculating the Grothendieck expansion of K-theoretic Thom polynomials of ${\mathcal {A}}_{2}$ singularities. We present this expansion in two versions: one displays its stabilization property, while the other displays its expected finiteness property.more » « less