skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 7:00 AM ET to 7:30 AM ET on Friday, April 24 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Valuation of forest‐management and wildfire disturbance on water and carbon fluxes in mountain headwaters
Recent drought, wildfires and rising temperatures in the western US highlight the urgency of increasing resiliency in overstocked forests. However, limited valuation information hinders the broader participation of beneficiaries in forest management. We assessed how historical disturbances in California's Central Sierra Nevada affected live biomass, forest water use and carbon uptake and estimated marginal values of these changes. On average, low‐severity wildfire caused greater declines in forest evapotranspiration (ET), gross primary productivity (GPP) and live biomass than did commercial thinning. Low‐severity wildfires represent proxies for prescribed burns and both function as biomass removal to alleviate overstocked conditions. Increases in potential runoff over 15 years post‐disturbance were valued at $108,000/km2for commercial thinning versus $234,000/km2for low‐severity wildfire, based on historical water prices. Respective declines in GPP were valued at −$305,000 and −$1,317,000/km2, based on an average social cost of carbon. Considering biomass levels created by commercial thinning and low‐severity fire as more‐sustainable management baselines for overstocked forests, carbon uptake over 15 years post‐disturbance can be viewed as a benefit rather than loss. Realizing this benefit upon management re‐entry may require sequestering thinned material. High‐severity wildfire and clearcutting resulted in greater declines in ET and thus greater potential water benefits but also substantial declines in GPP and live carbon. These lessons from historical disturbances indicate what benefit ranges from fuels treatments can be expected from more‐sustainable management of mixed‐conifer forests and the importance of setting an appropriate baseline.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2153040
PAR ID:
10522920
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Online Library
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Ecohydrology
Volume:
17
Issue:
3
ISSN:
1936-0584
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Increases in the frequency and severity of climate-sensitive disturbances like wildfire, drought, and insect outbreaks pose an imminent threat to Earth’s forests, including their status as a net carbon sink. Forest treatments including thinning and prescribed fire are increasingly viewed as key tools for mitigating disturbance impacts, but their efficacy in stabilizing carbon stocks and reducing mortality, especially for drought and insect outbreaks, remains uncertain. Moreover, we have limited understanding of whether the moderating effect of forest treatments provides a net benefit to vegetation carbon stocks, or if the initial carbon loss required to implement treatments outweighs potential reductions in carbon losses during subsequent disturbance. Here we conduct a systematic meta-analysis of published literature to understand how thinning, prescribed fire, and combined treatments impact survival and carbon stocks following wildfires, droughts, and insect outbreaks. We found that treatments improved survival following wildfires, but had only marginal impacts on survival following drought and insect outbreaks. While thinning had a modest positive effect on carbon stocks following wildfire, treatments generally reduced carbon stocks following drought and had no impact following insect outbreaks. Overall, our findings suggest that the benefits of forest treatments for vegetation carbon stocks are limited, especially following drought and insect disturbances. These findings have important policy implications for carbon credit programs. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Wildfires are integral for western US forests that have evolved with fire. Here we define “good wildfire” as areas that burn in an ecologically beneficial way, with a severity and return interval analogous to their historical fire regimes prior to European settlement. When severities match what an ecosystem historically experienced they can regulate forest structure while promoting regeneration, even in a warming climate1. We quantified the amount of forested area (i.e., deciduous, conifer, or mixed forest types) burned with a severity and frequency matching its regime, and compared that to the area of prescribed burns in forests (2010-2020). Of forests that burned in the western US, 49% of the area burned as low-moderate severity good wildfire. High severity good wildfire (in systems that historically experienced this type of fire) represented an additional 9% of forest area burned, bringing the total area of good wildfire to 58% of forested area burned. The low-moderate severity good wildfires burned 3.1 million forest ha (N = 18,061 events), more than double the 1.4 million ha of prescribed burning (N = 24,817 events on federal land) over the same period. Knowing that fires are likely going to increase in frequency and area with warming2, our key challenge will be promoting good wildfire while still protecting lives and property. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Forest fire frequency, extent, and severity have rapidly increased in recent decades across the western United States (US) due to climate change and suppression‐oriented wildfire management. Fuels reduction treatments are an increasingly popular management tool, as evidenced by California's plan to treat 1 million acres annually by 2050. However, the aggregate efficacy of fuels treatments in dry forests at regional and multi‐decadal scales is unknown. We develop a novel fuels treatment module within a coupled dynamic vegetation and fire model to study the effects of dead biomass removal from forests in the Sierra Nevada region of California. We ask how annual treatment extent, stand‐level treatment intensiveness, and spatial treatment placement alter fire severity and live carbon loss. We find that a ∼30% reduction in stand‐replacing fire was achieved under our baseline treatment scenario of 1,000 km2 year−1after a 100‐year treatment period. Prioritizing the most fuel‐heavy stands based on precise fuel distributions yielded cumulative reductions in pyrogenic stand‐replacement of up to 50%. Both removing constraints on treatment location due to remoteness, topography, and management jurisdiction and prioritizing the most fuel‐heavy stands yielded the highest stand‐replacement rate reduction of ∼90%. Even treatments that succeeded in lowering aggregate fire severity often took multiple decades to yield measurable effects, and avoided live carbon loss remained negligible across scenarios. Our results suggest that strategically placed fuels treatments are a promising tool for controlling forest fire severity at regional, multi‐decadal scales, but may be less effective for mitigating live carbon losses. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Climate change has increased the size and frequency of wildfires across the boreal biome. Severe wildfires in boreal forests have been found to trigger shifts from evergreen to deciduous canopies, which has cascading effects on carbon and nitrogen cycling. Ecosystem productivity and carbon uptake in boreal forests are strongly linked with nitrogen, and Earth system models increasingly depend on our understanding of the nitrogen balance to predict post‐fire carbon uptake. To investigate the post‐fire boreal nitrogen balance, we combined a mass balance approach and literature synthesis to estimate rates of nitrogen accumulation and nitrogen inputs across a network of 18 boreal wildfire chronosequences that varied in both wildfire regime and post‐fire canopy type, comprising 527 forest stands. We found that deciduous‐ or mixed‐dominance boreal forests establishing after severe, stand‐replacing fires had the highest nitrogen accumulation rates (15.7 ± 3.8 kg ha−1 year−1), while evergreen‐dominated forests establishing after surface‐ or mixed‐severity fires had the lowest nitrogen accumulation rates (1.4 ± 1.1 kg ha−1 year−1). Annual known inputs from nitrogen deposition and biological nitrogen fixation combined, estimated from published data, largely failed to explain the rate of nitrogen accumulation, particularly in deciduous or mixed‐dominance forests establishing after stand‐replacing fires, suggesting that the origins of most nitrogen in these forest types remain poorly understood. As the frequency of severe wildfires increases across the boreal biome and shifts toward deciduous canopies become more common, our study reveals a large knowledge gap in the resulting nitrogen balance that needs to be resolved in order to improve predictions of forest carbon uptake. 
    more » « less
  5. Spatially explicit global estimates of forest carbon storage are typically coarsely scaled. While useful, these estimates do not account for the variability and distribution of carbon at management scales. We asked how climate, topography, and disturbance regimes interact across and within geopolitical boundaries to influence tree biomass carbon, using the perhumid region of the Pacific Coastal Temperate Rainforest, an infrequently disturbed carbon dense landscape, as a test case. We leveraged permanent sample plots in southeast Alaska and coastal British Columbia and used multiple quantile regression forests and generalized linear models to estimate tree biomass carbon stocks and the effects of topography, climate, and disturbance regimes. We estimate tree biomass carbon stocks are either 211 (SD = 163) Mg C ha−1or 218 (SD = 169) Mg C ha−1. Natural disturbance regimes had no correlation with tree biomass but logging decreased tree biomass carbon and the effect diminished with increasing time since logging. Despite accounting for 0.3% of global forest area, this forest stores between 0.63% and 1.07% of global aboveground forest carbon as aboveground live tree biomass. The disparate impact of logging and natural disturbance regimes on tree biomass carbon suggests a mismatch between current forest management and disturbance history. 
    more » « less