skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Synthetic Forecast Ensembles for Evaluating Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations
Abstract Forecast informed reservoir operations (FIRO) is an important advance in water management, but the design and testing of FIRO policies is limited by relatively short (10–35 year) hydro‐meteorological hindcasts. We present a novel, multisite model for synthetic forecast ensembles to overcome this limitation. This model utilizes parametric and non‐parametric procedures to capture complex forecast errors and maintain correlation between variables, lead times, locations, and ensemble members. After being fit to data from the hindcast period, this model can generate synthetic forecast ensembles in any period with observations. We demonstrate the approach in a case study of the FIRO‐based Ensemble Forecast Operations (EFO) control policy for the Lake Mendocino—Russian River basin, which conditions release decisions on ensemble forecasts from the Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast System (HEFS). We explore two generation strategies: (a) simulation of synthetic forecasts of meteorology to force HEFS; and (b) simulation of synthetic HEFS streamflow forecasts directly. We evaluate the synthetic forecasts using ensemble verification techniques and event‐based validation, finding good agreement with the actual ensemble forecasts. We then evaluate EFO policy performance using synthetic and actual forecasts over the hindcast period (1985–2010) and synthetic forecasts only over the pre‐hindcast period (1948–1984). Results show that the synthetic forecasts highlight important failure modes of the EFO policy under plausible forecast ensembles, but improvements are still needed to fully capture FIRO policy behavior under the actual forecast ensembles. Overall, the methodology advances a novel way to test FIRO policy robustness, which is key to building institutional support for FIRO.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2205239
PAR ID:
10530480
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Geophysical Union
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Water Resources Research
Volume:
60
Issue:
2
ISSN:
0043-1397
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Synthetic ensemble forecasts are an important tool for testing the robustness of forecast‐informed reservoir operations (FIRO). These forecasts are statistically generated to mimic the skill of hindcasts derived from operational ensemble forecasting systems, but they can be created for time periods when hindcast data are unavailable, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of FIRO policies. Nevertheless, it remains unclear how to determine whether a candidate synthetic ensemble forecasting approach is sufficiently representative of its real‐world counterpart to support FIRO policy evaluation. This highlights a need for formalfit‐for‐purposevalidation frameworks to advance synthetic forecasting as a generalizable risk analysis strategy. We address this research gap by first introducing a novel operations‐based validation framework, where reservoir storage and release simulations under a FIRO policy are compared when forced with a single ensemble hindcast and many different synthetic ensembles. We evaluate the suitability of synthetic forecasts based on formal probabilistic verification of the operational outcomes. Second, we develop a new synthetic ensemble forecasting algorithm and compare it to a previous algorithm using this validation framework across a set of stylized, hydrologically diverse reservoir systems in California. Results reveal clear differences in operational suitability, with the new method consistently outperforming the previous one. These findings demonstrate the promise of the newer synthetic forecasting approach as a generalizable tool for FIRO policy evaluation and robustness testing. They also underscore the value of the proposed validation framework in benchmarking and guiding future improvements in synthetic forecast development. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    The use of hydro-meteorological forecasts in water resources management holds great promise as a soft pathway to improve system performance. Methods for generating synthetic forecasts of hydro-meteorological variables are crucial for robust validation of forecast use, as numerical weather prediction hindcasts are only available for a relatively short period (10–40 years) that is insufficient for assessing risk related to forecast-informed decision-making during extreme events. We develop a generalized error model for synthetic forecast generation that is applicable to a range of forecasted variables used in water resources management. The approach samples from the distribution of forecast errors over the available hindcast period and adds them to long records of observed data to generate synthetic forecasts. The approach utilizes the Skew Generalized Error Distribution (SGED) to model marginal distributions of forecast errors that can exhibit heteroskedastic, auto-correlated, and non-Gaussian behavior. An empirical copula is used to capture covariance between variables, forecast lead times, and across space. We demonstrate the method for medium-range forecasts across Northern California in two case studies for (1) streamflow and (2) temperature and precipitation, which are based on hindcasts from the NOAA/NWS Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast System (HEFS) and the NCEP GEFS/R V2 climate model, respectively. The case studies highlight the flexibility of the model and its ability to emulate space-time structures in forecasts at scales critical for water resources management. The proposed method is generalizable to other locations and computationally efficient, enabling fast generation of long synthetic forecast ensembles that are appropriate for risk analysis. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Most available verification metrics for ensemble forecasts focus on univariate quantities. That is, they assess whether the ensemble provides anadequate representation of the forecast uncertainty about the quantity of interest at a particular location and time. For spatially indexed ensemble forecasts, however, it is also important that forecast fields reproduce the spatial structure of the observed field and represent the uncertainty about spatial properties such as the size of the area for which heavy precipitation, high winds, critical fire weather conditions, etc., areexpected. In this article we study the properties of the fraction of threshold exceedance (FTE) histogram, a new diagnostic tool designed forspatially indexed ensemble forecast fields. Defined as the fraction of grid points where a prescribed threshold is exceeded, the FTE is calculated for the verification field and separately for each ensemble member. It yields a projection of a – possibly high-dimensional – multivariatequantity onto a univariate quantity that can be studied with standard tools like verification rank histograms. This projection is appealing since itreflects a spatial property that is intuitive and directly relevant in applications, though it is not obvious whether the FTE is sufficientlysensitive to misrepresentation of spatial structure in the ensemble. In a comprehensive simulation study we find that departures from uniformity ofthe FTE histograms can indeed be related to forecast ensembles with biased spatial variability and that these histograms detect shortcomings in the spatial structure of ensemble forecast fields that are not obvious by eye. For demonstration, FTE histograms are applied in the context of spatiallydownscaled ensemble precipitation forecast fields from NOAA's Global Ensemble Forecast System. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Hail forecasts produced by the CAM-HAILCAST pseudo-Lagrangian hail size forecasting model were evaluated during the 2019, 2020, and 2021 NOAA HazardousWeather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments. As part of this evaluation, HWT SFE participants were polled about their definition of a “good” hail forecast. Participants were presented with two different verification methods conducted over three different spatiotemporal scales, and were then asked to subjectively evaluate the hail forecast as well as the different verificaiton methods themselves. Results recommended use of multiple verification methods tailored to the type of forecast expected by the end-user interpreting and applying the forecast. The hail forecasts evaluated during this period included an implementation of CAM-HAILCAST in the Limited Area Model of the Unified Forecast System with the Finite Volume 3 (FV3) dynamical core. Evaluation of FV3-HAILCAST over both 1-h and 24-h periods found continued improvement from 2019 to 2021. The improvement was largely a result of wide intervariability among FV3 ensemble members with different microphysics parameterizations in 2019 lessening significantly during 2020 and 2021. Overprediction throughout the diurnal cycle also lessened by 2021. A combination of both upscaling neighborhood verification and an object-based technique that only retained matched convective objects was necessary to understand the improvement., agreeing with the HWT SFE participants’ recommendations for multiple verification methods. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Some of the most intense convective storms on Earth initiate near the Sierras de Córdoba mountain range in Argentina. The goal of the RELAMPAGO field campaign was to observe these intense convective storms and their associated impacts. The intense observation period (IOP) occurred during November–December 2018. The two goals of the hydrometeorological component of RELAMPAGO IOP were 1) to perform hydrological streamflow and meteorological observations in previously ungauged basins and 2) to build a hydrometeorological modeling system for hindcast and forecast applications. During the IOP, our team was able to construct the stage–discharge curves in three basins, as hydrological instrumentation and personnel were successfully deployed based on RELAMPAGO weather forecasts. We found that the flood response time in these river locations is typically between 5 and 6 h from the peak of the rain event. The satellite-observed rainfall product IMERG-Final showed a better representation of rain gauge–estimated precipitation, while IMERG-Early and IMERG-Late had significant positive bias. The modeling component focuses on the 48-h simulation of an extreme hydrometeorological event that occurred on 27 November 2018. Using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) atmospheric model and its hydrologic component WRF-Hydro as an uncoupled hydrologic model, we developed a system for hindcast, deterministic forecast, and a 60-member ensemble forecast initialized with regional-scale atmospheric data assimilation. Critically, our results highlight that streamflow simulations using the ensemble forecasting with data assimilation provide realistic flash flood forecast in terms of timing and magnitude of the peak. Our findings from this work are being used by the water managers in the region. 
    more » « less