An official website of the United States government
Abstract Snowpack provides the majority of predictive information for water supply forecasts (WSFs) in snow-dominated basins across the western United States. Drought conditions typically accompany decreased snowpack and lowered runoff efficiency, negatively impacting WSFs. Here, we investigate the relationship between snow water equivalent (SWE) and April–July streamflow volume (AMJJ-V) during drought in small headwater catchments, using observations from 31 USGS streamflow gauges and 54 SNOTEL stations. A linear regression approach is used to evaluate forecast skill under different historical climatologies used for model fitting, as well as with different forecast dates. Experiments are constructed in which extreme hydrological drought years are withheld from model training, that is, years with AMJJ-V below the 15th percentile. Subsets of the remaining years are used for model fitting to understand how the climatology of different training subsets impacts forecasts of extreme drought years. We generally report overprediction in drought years. However, training the forecast model on drier years, that is, below-median years ( P 15 , P 57.5 ], minimizes residuals by an average of 10% in drought year forecasts, relative to a baseline case, with the highest median skill obtained in mid- to late April for colder regions. We report similar findings using a modified National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) procedure in nine large Upper Colorado River basin (UCRB) basins, highlighting the importance of the snowpack–streamflow relationship in streamflow predictability. We propose an “adaptive sampling” approach of dynamically selecting training years based on antecedent SWE conditions, showing error reductions of up to 20% in historical drought years relative to the period of record. These alternate training protocols provide opportunities for addressing the challenges of future drought risk to water supply planning. Significance Statement Seasonal water supply forecasts based on the relationship between peak snowpack and water supply exhibit unique errors in drought years due to low snow and streamflow variability, presenting a major challenge for water supply prediction. Here, we assess the reliability of snow-based streamflow predictability in drought years using a fixed forecast date or fixed model training period. We critically evaluate different training protocols that evaluate predictive performance and identify sources of error during historical drought years. We also propose and test an “adaptive sampling” application that dynamically selects training years based on antecedent SWE conditions providing to overcome persistent errors and provide new insights and strategies for snow-guided forecasts.
more »
« less
Sources of seasonal water supply forecast uncertainty during snow drought in the Sierra Nevada
Abstract Uncertainty attribution in water supply forecasting is crucial to improve forecast skill and increase confidence in seasonal water management planning. We develop a framework to quantify fractional forecast uncertainty and partition it between (1) snowpack quantification methods, (2) variability in post‐forecast precipitation, and (3) runoff model errors. We demonstrate the uncertainty framework with statistical runoff models in the upper Tuolumne and Merced River basins (California, USA) using snow observations at two endmember spatial resolutions: a simple snow pillow index and full‐catchment snow water equivalent (SWE) maps at 50 m resolution from the Airborne Snow Observatories. Bayesian forecast simulations demonstrate a nonlinear decrease in the skill of statistical water supply forecasts during warm snow droughts, when a low fraction of winter precipitation remains as SWE. Forecast skill similarly decreases during dry snow droughts, when winter precipitation is low. During a shift away from snow‐dominance, the uncertainty of forecasts using snow pillow data increases about 1.9 times faster than analogous forecasts using full‐catchment SWE maps in the study area. Replacing the snow pillow index with full‐catchment SWE data reduces statistical forecast uncertainty by 39% on average across all tested climate conditions. Attributing water supply forecast uncertainty to reducible error sources reveals opportunities to improve forecast reliability in a warmer future climate.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1723990
- PAR ID:
- 10535304
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- ISSN:
- 1093-474X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract The Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) framework combines a probabilistic forecast structure with process‐based models for water supply predictions. However, process‐based models require computationally intensive parameter estimation, increasing uncertainties and limiting usability. Motivated by the strong performance of deep learning models, we seek to assess whether the Long Short‐Term Memory (LSTM) model can provide skillful forecasts and replace process‐based models within the ESP framework. Given challenges inimplicitlycapturing snowpack dynamics within LSTMs for streamflow prediction, we also evaluated the added skill ofexplicitlyincorporating snowpack information to improve hydrologic memory representation. LSTM‐ESPs were evaluated under four different scenarios: one excluding snow and three including snow with varied snowpack representations. The LSTM models were trained using information from 664 GAGES‐II basins during WY1983–2000. During a testing period, WY2001–2010, 80% of basins exhibited Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) above 0.5 with a median NSE of around 0.70, indicating satisfactory utility in simulating seasonal water supply. LSTM‐ESP forecasts were then tested during WY2011–2020 over 76 western US basins with operational Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) forecasts. A key finding is that in high snow regions, LSTM‐ESP forecasts using simplified ablation assumptions performed worse than those excluding snow, highlighting that snow data do not consistently improve LSTM‐ESP performance. However, LSTM‐ESP forecasts that explicitly incorporated past years' snow accumulation and ablation performed comparably to NRCS forecasts and better than forecasts excluding snow entirely. Overall, integrating deep learning within an ESP framework shows promise and highlights important considerations for including snowpack information in forecasting.more » « less
-
Winter precipitation forecasting at sufficient lead times has several benefits, including aiding water allocation decisions and supporting individual water users’ decision-making. This study evaluates the performance of ensemble-mean cool-season (December through March) precipitation forecasts from individual models within the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) over the Colorado River Basin and California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin-Tulare basins (hereafter referred to as the SST). These ensemble-mean forecasts are compared to a newly developed statistical forecasting model, using the rain-gauge-based Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM) as the reference product. While NMME models effectively capture the spatial pattern of mean precipitation, they struggle to predict year-to-year variability and extremes. Forecast skill is higher in the Colorado Basin than in the SST Basin. Anomaly correlations between ensemble-mean NMME forecasts and observations vary by model and basin, with GEM5-NEMO and GFDL-SPEAR showing relatively higher skill. Performance in forecasting droughts and wet/dry years remains inconsistent across models, with most models missing key events such as the 2023 and 2017 wet years and the 2022 drought. Simple statistical models using key atmospheric–oceanic predictors outperformed the more complex ensemble-mean NMME dynamical models in both basins. The most effective predictors were the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), Tropical South Atlantic (TSA) sea surface temperatures, and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) for the SST Basin, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Tropical North Atlantic (TNA) sea surface temperatures for the Colorado Basin.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT In snow‐dominated areas, runoff from winter precipitation can comprise up to 80% of the annual water budget. Warming winters are shifting snow precipitation to rain, shortening the snow accumulation and melt seasons, and increasing midwinter melt events and flooding during rain‐on‐snow events. At the same time, forests are changing in species composition and geographical extent, and forest‐dominated catchments can mediate the effects of increased winter temperatures on snow dynamics. Here, we combine climatic data and high‐resolution forest and snow observations to investigate the complex relationships between forest canopy structure and below‐canopy snow depth in two low‐relief Mississippi headwater catchments. To do so, we use a two‐dimensional canopy cover metric (i.e., leaf area index) with forest canopy and understory surveys and catchment terrain (e.g., slope, aspect) to examine their joint influences on snow depth. Results show that (1) co‐dominant tree density is a better predictor of peak snow depth over leaf area index, due to representation of both canopy overlap and interception and (2) canopy structural diversity increases peak snow depth. These results suggest that maintaining forest structural diversity not only contributes to forest health but also allows for a deeper snowpack, thereby increasing the potential for water storage in snow‐dominated low‐relief watersheds.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Precipitation occurs in two basic forms defined as liquid state and solid state. Different from rain-fed watershed, modeling snow processes is of vital importance in snow-dominated watersheds. The seasonal snowpack is a natural water reservoir, which stores snow water in winter and releases it in spring and summer. The warmer climate in recent decades has led to earlier snowmelt, a decline in snowpack, and change in the seasonality of river flows. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) could be applied in the snow-influenced watershed because of its ability to simultaneously predict the streamflow generated from rainfall and from the melting of snow. The choice of parameters, reference data, and calibration strategy could significantly affect the SWAT model calibration outcome and further affect the prediction accuracy. In this study, SWAT models are implemented in four upland watersheds in the Tulare Lake Basin (TLB) located across the Southern Sierra Nevada Mountains. Three calibration scenarios considering different calibration parameters and reference datasets are applied to investigate the impact of the Parallel Energy Balance Model (ParBal) snow reconstruction data and snow parameters on the streamflow and snow water-equivalent (SWE) prediction accuracy. In addition, the watershed parameters and lapse rate parameters-led equifinality is also evaluated. The results indicate that calibration of the SWAT model with respect to both streamflow and SWE reference data could improve the model SWE prediction reliability in general. Comparatively, the streamflow predictions are not significantly affected by differently lumped calibration schemes. The default snow parameter values capture the extreme high flows better than the other two calibration scenarios, whereas there is no remarkable difference among the three calibration schemes for capturing the extreme low flows. The watershed and lapse rate parameters-induced equifinality affects the flow prediction more (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) varies between 0.2–0.3) than the SWE prediction (NSE varies less than 0.1). This study points out the remote-sensing-based SWE reconstruction product as a promising alternative choice for model calibration in ungauged snow-influenced watersheds. The streamflow-reconstructed SWE bi-objective calibrated model could improve the prediction reliability of surface water supply change for the downstream agricultural region under the changing climate.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13221
