More Like this

1. re Engineering Students Motivated by Interacting With Simulations They Program? A Controlled Study

   Bacher, John; Price, Thomas; Skripchuk, James; Wengran, Wang; Shi, Yang; Tran, Keith (December 2024, ACM SIGCSE Virtual Conference 2024)

   When instructors want to design programming assignments to motivate their students, a common design choice is to have those students write code to make an artifact (e.g. apps, games, music, or images). The goal of this study is to understand the impacts of including artifact creation in a programming assignment on students’ motivation, time on task, and cognitive load. To do so, we conducted a controlled lab study with seventy-three students from an introductory engineering course. The experimental group created a simulation they could interact with – thus having the full experience of artifact creation – while the control group wrote the exact same code, but evaluated it only with test cases. We hypothesized that students who could interact with the simulation they were programming would be more motivated to complete the assignment and report higher intrinsic motivation. However, we found no significant difference in motivation or cognitive load between the groups. Additionally, the experimental group spent more time completing the assignment than the control group. Our results suggest that artifact creation may not be necessary for motivating students in all contexts, and that artifact creation may have other effects such as increased time on task. Additionally, instructors and researchers should consider when, and in what contexts, artifact creation is beneficial and when it may not be 

   more » « less
2. Using Microsaccades to Estimate Task Difficulty During Visual Search of Layered Surfaces

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2901881  

   Duchowski, Andrew; Krejtz, Krzysztof; Zurawska, Justyna; House, Donald (February 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)

   We develop an approach to using microsaccade dynamics for the measurement of task difficulty/cognitive load imposed by a visual search task of a layered surface. Previous studies provide converging evidence that task difficulty/cognitive load can influence microsaccade activity. We corroborate this notion. Specifically, we explore this relationship during visual search for features embedded in a terrain-like surface, with the eyes allowed to move freely during the task. We make two relevant contributions. First, we validate an approach to distinguishing between the ambient and focal phases of visual search. We show that this spectrum of visual behavior can be quantified by a single previously reported estimator, known as Krejtz's K coefficient. Second, we use ambient/focal segments based on K as a moderating factor for microsaccade analysis in response to task difficulty. We find that during the focal phase of visual search (a) microsaccade magnitude increases significantly, and (b) microsaccade rate decreases significantly, with increased task difficulty. We conclude that the combined use of K and microsaccade analysis may be helpful in building effective tools that provide an indication of the level of cognitive activity within a task while the task is being performed. 

   more » « less
3. Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks

   Ruihan Wu, Chuan Guo (January 2021, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   Most computer science conferences rely on paper bidding to assign reviewers to papers. Although paper bidding enables high-quality assignments in days of unprecedented submission numbers, it also opens the door for dishonest reviewers to adversarially influence paper reviewing assignments. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some reviewers bid on papers by “friends” or colluding authors, even though these papers are outside their area of expertise, and recommend them for acceptance without considering the merit of the work. In this paper, we study the efficacy of such bid manipulation attacks and find that, indeed, they can jeopardize the integrity of the review process. We develop a novel approach for paper bidding and assignment that is much more robust against such attacks. We show empirically that our approach provides robustness even when dishonest reviewers collude, have full knowledge of the assignment system’s internal workings, and have access to the system’s inputs. In addition to being more robust, the quality of our paper review assignments is comparable to that of current, non-robust assignment approaches. 

   more » « less
4. Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks

   Ruihan Wu, Chuan Guo (January 2021, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research)

   Most computer science conferences rely on paper bidding to assign reviewers to papers. Although paper bidding enables high-quality assignments in days of unprecedented submission numbers, it also opens the door for dishonest reviewers to adversarially influence paper reviewing assignments. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some reviewers bid on papers by "friends" or colluding authors, even though these papers are outside their area of expertise, and recommend them for acceptance without considering the merit of the work. In this paper, we study the efficacy of such bid manipulation attacks and find that, indeed, they can jeopardize the integrity of the review process. We develop a novel approach for paper bidding and assignment that is much more robust against such attacks. We show empirically that our approach provides robustness even when dishonest reviewers collude, have full knowledge of the assignment system’s internal workings, and have access to the system’s inputs. In addition to being more robust, the quality of our paper review assignments is comparable to that of current, non-robust assignment approaches. 

   more » « less
5. Pupillary and microsaccadic responses to cognitive effort and emotional arousal during complex decision making

   https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.13.5.2  

   Krejtz, Krzysztof; Żurawska, Justyna; Duchowski, Andrew; Wichary, Szymon (May 2020, Journal of eye movement research)

   A large body of literature documents the sensitivity of pupil response to cognitive load (e.g., Krejtz et al. 2018) and emotional arousal (Bradley et al., 2008). Recent empirical evidence also showed that microsaccade characteristics and dynamics can be modulated by mental fatigue and cognitive load (e.g., Dalmaso et al. 2017). Very little is known about the sensitivity of microsaccadic characteristics to emotional arousal. The present paper demonstrates in a controlled experiment pupillary and microsaccadic responses to information processing during multi-attribute decision making under affective priming. Twenty-one psychology students were randomly assigned into three affective priming conditions (neutral, aversive, and erotic). Participants were tasked to make several discriminative decisions based on acquired cues. In line with the expectations, results showed microsaccadic rate inhibition and pupillary dilation depending on cognitive effort (number of acquired cues) prior to decision. These effects were moderated by affective priming. Aversive priming strengthened pupillary and microsaccadic response to information processing effort. In general, results suggest that pupillary response is more biased by affective priming than microsaccadic rate. The results are discussed in the light of neuropsychological mechanisms of pupillary and microsaccadic behavior generation. 

   more » « less