skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Engineering Students Engagement Profiles while Using Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules
There is overwhelming research evidence showing that students often struggle with learning key engineering concepts. The Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) are model prototypes of standard industry equipment designed for students to learn some fundamental but abstract engineering concepts in the classrooms. Previous results have shown that students who interact with LCDLMs tend to outperform those who engage in traditional lectures. However, little is known about student profiles and their forms of engagement with this tool. Hence, the present study seeks to investigate the different student profiles that emerge from students working with the LCDLM and the demographic factors that influence student engagement with the tool. Participants (N = 1,288) responded to an engagement survey after working with LCDLMs in engineering classrooms in several states around the United States. We then used a latent profile analysis (LPA) – an advanced statistical approach – to better understand the representation of learner engagement profiles resulting from their self-reported learning engagement beliefs as they reflect on their experience in using LCDLMs. The LPA revealed five distinct profile types – disengaged, somewhat engaged, moderately engaged, highly engaged, and fluctuating engagement. Results showed that those who are more interactive and actively engaged with the LCDLM scored higher on their questionnaire compared to those who passively engaged with the LCDLM. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1821679
PAR ID:
10545057
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
TEMPUS Publications
Date Published:
Journal Name:
IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education
Volume:
40
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2540-9808
Page Range / eLocation ID:
322-335
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
low-cost desktop learning module student engagement hands-on learning
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; (, Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education)
    Hands-on experiments using the Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) have been implemented in dozens of classrooms to supplement student learning of heat transfer and fluid mechanics concepts with students of varying prior knowledge. The prior knowledge of students who encounter these LCDLMs in the classroom may impact the degree to which students learn from these interactive pedagogies. This paper reports on the differences in student cognitive learning between groups with low and high prior knowledge of the concepts that are tested. Student conceptual test results for venturi, hydraulic loss, and double pipe heat exchanger LCDLMs are analyzed by grouping the student data into two bins based on pre-test score, one for students scoring below 50% and another for those scoring above and comparing the improvement from pretest to posttest between the two groups. The analysis includes data from all implementations of each LCDLM for the 2020-2021 school year. Results from each of the three LCDLMs were analyzed separately to compare student performance on different fluid mechanics or heat exchanger concepts. Then, the overall pre- and posttest scores for all three LCDLMs were analyzed to examine how this interactive pedagogy impacts cognitive gains. Results showed statistically significant differences in improvement between low prior knowledge groups and high prior knowledge groups. Additional findings showed statistically significant results suggesting that the gaps in performance between low prior knowledge and high prior knowledge groups on pre-tests for the LCDLMs were decreased on the posttest. Findings showed that students with lower prior knowledge show a greater overall improvement in cognitive gains than those with higher prior knowledge on all three low-cost desktop learning modules. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, ASEE annual conference)
    Hands-on experiments using the Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) have been implemented in dozens of classrooms to supplement student learning of heat transfer and fluid mechanics concepts with students of varying prior knowledge. The prior knowledge of students who encounter these LCDLMs in the classroom may impact the degree to which students learn from these interactive pedagogies. This paper reports on the differences in student cognitive learning between groups with low and high prior knowledge of the concepts that are tested. Student conceptual test results for venturi, hydraulic loss, and double pipe heat exchanger LCDLMs are analyzed by grouping the student data into two bins based on pre-test score, one for students scoring below 50% and another for those scoring above and comparing the improvement from pretest to posttest between the two groups. The analysis includes data from all implementations of each LCDLM for the 2020-2021 school year. Results from each of the three LCDLMs were analyzed separately to compare student performance on different fluid mechanics or heat exchanger concepts. Then, the overall pre- and posttest scores for all three LCDLMs were analyzed to examine how this interactive pedagogy impacts cognitive gains. Results showed statistically significant differences in improvement between low prior knowledge groups and high prior knowledge groups. Additional findings showed statistically significant results suggesting that the gaps in performance between low prior knowledge and high prior knowledge groups on pre-tests for the LCDLMs were decreased on the posttest. Findings showed that students with lower prior knowledge show a greater overall improvement in cognitive gains than those with higher prior knowledge on all three low-cost desktop learning modules. 
    more » « less
  3. (, International journal of engineering education)
    Although there is extensive literature documenting hands-on learning experiences in engineering classrooms, there is a lack of consensus regarding how student learning during these activities compares to learning during online video demonstrations. Further, little work has been done to directly compare student learning for similarly-designed hands-on learning experiences focused on different engineering subjects. As the use of hands-on activities in engineering continues to grow and expand to non-traditional virtual applications, understanding how to optimize student learning during these activities is critical. To address this, we collected conceptual assessment data from 763 students at 15 four-year institutions. The students completed activities with one of two highly visual low-cost desktop learning modules (LCDLMs), one focused on fluid mechanics and the other on heat transfer principles, using two different implementation formats: either hands-on or video demonstration. To examine the effect of implementation format and of the learning tool used, learning gains on conceptual assessments were compared for virtual and hands-on implementations of fluid mechanics and heat transfer LCDLMs. Results showed that learning gains were positive and similar for hands-on and video demonstrations for both modules assessed, suggesting both implementation formats support an impactful student learning experience. However, a significant difference was observed in effectiveness based on the type of LCDLM used. Score increases of 31.2% and 24% were recorded on our post-activity assessment for hands-on and virtual implementations of the fluid mechanics LCDLM compared to pre-activity assessment scores, respectively, while smaller 8.2% and 9.2% increases were observed for hands-on and virtual implementations of the heat transfer LCDLM. In this paper, we consider existing literature to ascertain the reasons for similar effectiveness of hands-on and video demonstrations and for the differing effectiveness of the fluid mechanics and heat transfer LCDLMs. We discuss the practical implications of our findings with respect to designing hands-on or video demonstration activities. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education)
    Although there is extensive literature documenting hands-on learning experiences in engineering classrooms, there is a lack of consensus regarding how student learning during these activities compares to learning during online video demonstrations. Further, little work has been done to directly compare student learning for similarly-designed hands-on learning experiences focused on different engineering subjects. As the use of hands-on activities in engineering continues to grow, understanding how to optimize student learning during these activities is critical. To address this, we collected conceptual assessment data from 763 students at 15 four-year institutions. Students completed activities with one of two highly visual low-cost desktop learning modules (LCDLMs), one focused on fluid mechanics and the other on heat transfer principles, using two different implementation formats: either hands-on or video demonstration. Conceptual assessment results showed that assessment scores significantly increased after all LCDLM activities and that gains were statistically similar for hands-on and video demonstrations, suggesting both implementation formats support an impactful student learning experience. However, a significant difference was observed in effectiveness based on the type of LCDLM used. Score increases of 31.2% and 24% were recorded on our post-activity assessment for hands-on and virtual implementations of the fluid mechanics LCDLM compared to pre-activity assessment scores, respectively, while significantly smaller 8.2% and 9.2% increases were observed for hands-on and virtual implementations of the heat transfer LCDLM. In this paper, we consider existing literature to ascertain the reasons for similar effectiveness of hands-on and video demonstrations and for the differing effectiveness of the fluid mechanics and heat transfer LCDLMs. We discuss the practical implications of our findings with respect to designing hands-on or video demonstration activities. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, IJEE International Journal of Engineering Education)
    Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) are innovative, affordable educational tools designed to enhance hands-on learning experiences in engineering education. Previous studies have shown the effectiveness of LCDLMs in promoting engineering student engagement and learning outcomes. The present study further explored whether different types of LCDLMs could influence student engagement and learning outcomes differently. This study compared four LCDLMs (i.e., Double Pipe, Hydraulic Loss, Shell & Tube, and Venturi). In total, 2190 undergraduate and graduate students from 29 universities in the United States participated in this study. Results of this study showed that the Shell & Tube module significantly outperformed the Hydraulic Loss and Venturi modules in promoting enhancements in student Active scores. However, no significant differences were observed between the Double Pipe module and the other modules on Active scores. Moreover, the Hydraulic Loss module led to significantly higher knowledge growth compared to the Double Pipe, Shell & Tube, and Venturi modules. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email