More Like this

1. On Line-Separable Weighted Unit-Disk Coverage and Related Problems

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2024.70  

   Liu, Gang; Wang, Haitao (August 2024, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Kráľovič, Rastislav; Kučera, Antonín (Ed.)

   Given a set P of n points and a set S of n weighted disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem is to compute a subset of disks of smallest total weight such that the union of the disks in the subset covers all points of P. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-separable unit-disk version of the problem where all disks have the same radius and their centers are separated from the points of P by a line 𝓁. We present an O(n^{3/2}log² n) time algorithm for the problem. This improves the previously best work of O(n²log n) time. Our result leads to an algorithm of O(n^{7/2}log² n) time for the halfplane coverage problem (i.e., using n weighted halfplanes to cover n points), an improvement over the previous O(n⁴log n) time solution. If all halfplanes are lower ones, our algorithm runs in O(n^{3/2}log² n) time, while the previous best algorithm takes O(n²log n) time. Using duality, the hitting set problems under the same settings can be solved with similar time complexities. 

   more » « less
2. On the Line-Separable Unit-Disk Coverage and Related Problems

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2023.51  

   Liu, Gang; Wang, Haitao (November 2023, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Iwata, Satoru; Kakimura, Naonori (Ed.)

   Given a set P of n points and a set S of m disks in the plane, the disk coverage problem asks for a smallest subset of disks that together cover all points of P. The problem is NP-hard. In this paper, we consider a line-separable unit-disk version of the problem where all disks have the same radius and their centers are separated from the points of P by a line 𝓁. We present an m^{2/3} n^{2/3} 2^O(log^*(m+n)) + O((n+m)log(n+m)) time algorithm for the problem. This improves the previously best result of O(nm + n log n) time. Our techniques also solve the line-constrained version of the problem, where centers of all disks of S are located on a line 𝓁 while points of P can be anywhere in the plane. Our algorithm runs in O(m√n + (n+m)log(n+m)) time, which improves the previously best result of O(nm log(m+n)) time. In addition, our results lead to an algorithm of n^{10/3} 2^O(log^*n) time for a half-plane coverage problem (given n half-planes and n points, find a smallest subset of half-planes covering all points); this improves the previously best algorithm of O(n⁴log n) time. Further, if all half-planes are lower ones, our algorithm runs in n^{4/3} 2^O(log^*n) time while the previously best algorithm takes O(n²log n) time. 

   more » « less
3. Optimal Algorithm for the Planar Two-Center Problem

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SoCG.2024.40  

   Cho, Kyungjin; Oh, Eunjin; Wang, Haitao; Xue, Jie (June 2024, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Mulzer, Wolfgang; Phillips, Jeff M (Ed.)

   We study a fundamental problem in Computational Geometry, the planar two-center problem. In this problem, the input is a set S of n points in the plane and the goal is to find two smallest congruent disks whose union contains all points of S. A longstanding open problem has been to obtain an O(nlog n)-time algorithm for planar two-center, matching the Ω(nlog n) lower bound given by Eppstein [SODA'97]. Towards this, researchers have made a lot of efforts over decades. The previous best algorithm, given by Wang [SoCG'20], solves the problem in O(nlog² n) time. In this paper, we present an O(nlog n)-time (deterministic) algorithm for planar two-center, which completely resolves this open problem. 

   more » « less
4. Eulerian Graph Sparsification by Effective Resistance Decomposition

   Jambulapati, Arun; Sachdeva, Sushant; Sidford, Aaron; Tian, Kevin; Zhao, Yibin (August 2024, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.10172)

   The authors present an algorithm that, given an n-vertex m-edge Eulerian graph with polynomially bounded weights, computes an 𝑂 ~ ( 𝑛 log ⁡ 2 𝑛 ⋅ 𝜀 − 2 ) O ~ (nlog 2 n⋅ε −2 )-edge 𝜀 ε-approximate Eulerian sparsifier with high probability in 𝑂 ~ ( 𝑚 log ⁡ 3 𝑛 ) O ~ (mlog 3 n) time (where 𝑂 ~ ( ⋅ ) O ~ (⋅) hides polyloglog(n) factors). By a reduction from Peng-Song (STOC ’22), this yields an 𝑂 ~ ( 𝑚 log ⁡ 3 𝑛 + 𝑛 log ⁡ 6 𝑛 ) O ~ (mlog 3 n+nlog 6 n)-time algorithm for solving n-vertex m-edge Eulerian Laplacian systems with polynomially bounded weights with high probability, improving on the previous state-of-the-art runtime of Ω ( 𝑚 log ⁡ 8 𝑛 + 𝑛 log ⁡ 23 𝑛 ) Ω(mlog 8 n+nlog 23 n). They also provide a polynomial-time algorithm that computes sparsifiers with 𝑂 ( min ⁡ ( 𝑛 log ⁡ 𝑛 ⋅ 𝜀 − 2 + 𝑛 log ⁡ 5 / 3 𝑛 ⋅ 𝜀 − 4 / 3 , 𝑛 log ⁡ 3 / 2 𝑛 ⋅ 𝜀 − 2 ) ) O(min(nlogn⋅ε −2 +nlog 5/3 n⋅ε −4/3 ,nlog 3/2 n⋅ε −2 )) edges, improving the previous best bounds. Furthermore, they extend their techniques to yield the first 𝑂 ( 𝑚 ⋅ polylog ( 𝑛 ) ) O(m⋅polylog(n))-time algorithm for computing 𝑂 ( 𝑛 𝜀 − 1 ⋅ polylog ( 𝑛 ) ) O(nε −1 ⋅polylog(n))-edge graphical spectral sketches, along with a natural Eulerian generalization. Unlike prior approaches using short cycle or expander decompositions, their algorithms leverage a new effective resistance decomposition scheme, combined with natural sampling and electrical routing for degree balance. The analysis applies asymmetric variance bounds specialized to Eulerian Laplacians and tools from discrepancy theory. 

   more » « less
5. Unit-disk range searching and applications

   https://doi.org/10.20382/jocg.v14i1a13  

   Wang, Haitao (December 2023, Journal of computational geometry)

   Given a set $$P$$ of $$n$$ points in the plane, we consider the problem of computing the number of points of $$P$$ in a query unit disk (i.e., all query disks have the same radius). We show that the main techniques for simplex range searching in the plane can be adapted to this problem. For example, by adapting Matoušek's results, we can build a data structure of $O(n)$ space in $$O(n^{1+\delta})$$ time (for any $$\delta>0$$) so that each query can be answered in $$O(\sqrt{n})$$ time; alternatively, we can build a data structure of $$O(n^2/\log^2 n)$$ space with $$O(n^{1+\delta})$$ preprocessing time (for any $$\delta>0$$) and $$O(\log n)$$ query time. Our techniques lead to improvements for several other classical problems in computational geometry. 1. Given a set of $$n$$ unit disks and a set of $$n$$ points in the plane, the batched unit-disk range counting problem is to compute for each disk the number of points in it. Previous work [Katz and Sharir, 1997] solved the problem in $$O(n^{4/3}\log n)$$ time. We give a new algorithm of $$O(n^{4/3})$$ time, which is optimal as it matches an $$\Omega(n^{4/3})$$-time lower bound. For small $$\chi$$, where $$\chi$$ is the number of pairs of unit disks that intersect, we further improve the algorithm to $$O(n^{2/3}\chi^{1/3}+n^{1+\delta})$$ time, for any $$\delta>0$$. 2. The above result immediately leads to an $$O(n^{4/3})$$ time optimal algorithm for counting the intersecting pairs of circles for a set of $$n$$ unit circles in the plane. The previous best algorithms solve the problem in $$O(n^{4/3}\log n)$$ deterministic time [Katz and Sharir, 1997] or in $$O(n^{4/3}\log^{2/3} n)$$ expected time by a randomized algorithm [Agarwal, Pellegrini, and Sharir, 1993]. 3. Given a set $$P$$ of $$n$$ points in the plane and an integer $$k$$, the distance selection problem is to find the $$k$$-th smallest distance among all pairwise distances of $$P$$. The problem can be solved in $$O(n^{4/3}\log^2 n)$$ deterministic time [Katz and Sharir, 1997] or in $$O(n\log n+n^{2/3}k^{1/3}\log^{5/3}n)$$ expected time by a randomized algorithm [Chan, 2001]. Our new randomized algorithm runs in $$O(n\log n +n^{2/3}k^{1/3}\log n)$$ expected time. 4. Given a set $$P$$ of $$n$$ points in the plane, the discrete $$2$$-center problem is to compute two smallest congruent disks whose centers are in $$P$$ and whose union covers $$P$$. An $$O(n^{4/3}\log^5 n)$$-time algorithm was known [Agarwal, Sharir, and Welzl, 1998]. Our techniques yield a deterministic algorithm of $$O(n^{4/3}\log^{10/3} n\cdot (\log\log n)^{O(1)})$$ time and a randomized algorithm of $$O(n^{4/3}\log^3 n\cdot (\log\log n)^{1/3})$$ expected time. 

   more » « less