skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The strength of an adhesive contact in the presence of interfacial defects
Adhesive contacts which possess a dominant stress concentration, such as at the contact edge in spherical junctions or at the detachment front in a peeling film, are well studied. More complex adhesive junction geometries, such as mushroom-shaped fibrils in bioinspired micropatterned dry adhesives, have exhibited a complex dependence of adhesive strength on the presence of interfacial defects within the contact. This has led to the emergence of statistical variation of the local behavior among micropatterned sub-contacts. In order to examine the interplay between geometry and interfacial defect character in control of the adhesive strength, the model system of a stiff cylindrical probe on an elastic layer is examined. Both experiments (glass on PDMS) and cohesive zone finite element simulations are performed, with analytical asymptotic limits also considered. The thickness of the elastic layer is varied to alter the interfacial stress distribution, with thinner layers having a reduced edge stress concentration at the expense of increased stress at the contact center. The size and position of manufactured interfacial defects is varied. It is observed that for the thickest substrates the edge stress concentration is dominant, with detachment propagating from this region regardless of the presence of an interfacial defect within the contact. Only very large center defects, with radius greater than half of that of the contact influence the adhesive strength. This transition is in agreement with analytical asymptotic limits. As the substrate is made thinner and the stress distribution changes, a strong decay in adhesive strength with increasing center defect radius emerges. For the thinnest substrate the flaw-insensitive upper bound is approached, suggesting that this decay is dominated by a reduction in the contact area. For penny-shaped defects at increasing radial positions, the adhesive strength for the thinnest substrates becomes non-monotonic. This confirms an intricate interplay between the geometry-controlled interfacial stress distribution and the size and position of interfacial defects in adhesive contacts, which will lead to statistical variation in strength when defects form due to surface roughness, fabrication imperfections, or contaminant particles.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2211761
PAR ID:
10548362
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Mendeley Data
Date Published:
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Mechanics Adhesion Contact Mechanics
Format(s):
Medium: X
Right(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Adhesive contacts which possess a dominant stress concentration, such as at the contact edge in spherical junctions or at the detachment front in a peeling film, are well studied. More complex adhesive junction geometries, such as mushroom-shaped fibrils in bioinspired micropatterned dry adhesives, have exhibited a complex dependence of adhesive strength on the presence of interfacial defects within the contact. This has led to the emergence of statistical variation of the local behavior among micropatterned sub-contacts. In order to examine the interplay between geometry and interfacial defect character in control of the adhesive strength, the model system of a stiff cylindrical probe on an elastic layer is examined. Both experiments (glass on PDMS) and cohesive zone finite element simulations are performed, with analytical asymptotic limits also considered. The thickness of the elastic layer is varied to alter the interfacial stress distribution, with thinner layers having a reduced edge stress concentration at the expense of increased stress at the contact center. The size and position of manufactured interfacial defects is varied. It is observed that for the thickest substrates the edge stress concentration is dominant, with detachment propagating from this region regardless of the presence of an interfacial defect within the contact. Only very large center defects, with radius greater than half of that of the contact influence the adhesive strength. This transition is in agreement with analytical asymptotic limits. As the substrate is made thinner and the stress distribution changes, a strong decay in adhesive strength with increasing center defect radius emerges. For the thinnest substrate the flaw-insensitive upper bound is approached, suggesting that this decay is dominated by a reduction in the contact area. For penny-shaped defects at increasing radial positions, the adhesive strength for the thinnest substrates becomes non-monotonic. This confirms an intricate interplay between the geometry-controlled interfacial stress distribution and the size and position of interfacial defects in adhesive contacts, which will lead to statistical variation in strength when defects form due to surface roughness, fabrication imperfections, or contaminant particles. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Fibrillar adhesives composed of fibers with non-circular cross-sections and contacts, including squares and rectangles, offer advantages that include a larger real contact area when arranged in arrays and simplicity in fabrication. However, they typically have a lower adhesion strength compared to circular pillars due to a stress concentration at the corner of the non-circular contact. We investigate the adhesion of composite pillars with circular, square and rectangular cross-sections each consisting of a stiff pillar terminated by a thin compliant layer at the tip. Finite element mechanics modeling is used to assess differences in the stress distribution at the interface for the different geometries and the adhesion strength of different shape pillars is measured in experiments. The composite fibrillar structure results in a favorable stress distribution on the adhered interface that shifts the crack initiation site away from the edge for all of the cross-sectional contact shapes studied. The highest adhesion strength achieved among the square and rectangular composite pillars with various tip layer thicknesses is approximately 65 kPa. This is comparable to the highest strength measured for circular composite pillars and is about 6.5× higher than the adhesion strength of a homogenous square or rectangular pillar. The results suggest that a composite fibrillar adhesive structure with a local stress concentration at a corner can achieve comparable adhesion strength to a fibrillar structure without such local stress concentrations if the magnitude of the corner stress concentrations are sufficiently small such that failure does not initiate near the corners, and the magnitude of the peak interface stress away from the edge and the tip layer thickness are comparable. 
    more » « less
  3. We characterize the mechanical recovery of compliant silicone gels following adhesive contact failure. We establish broad, stable adhesive contacts between rigid microspheres and soft gels, then stretch the gels to large deformations by pulling quasi-statically on the contact. Eventually, the adhesive contact begins to fail, and ultimately slides to a final contact point on the bottom of the sphere. Immediately after detachment, the gel recoils quickly with a self-similar surface profile that evolves as a power law in time, suggesting that the adhesive detachment point is singular. The singular dynamics we observe are consistent with a relaxation process driven by surface stress and slowed by viscous flow through the porous, elastic network of the gel. Our results emphasize the importance of accounting for both the liquid and solid phases of gels in understanding their mechanics 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Understanding the distribution of interfacial separations between contacting rough surfaces is integral for providing quantitative estimates for adhesive forces between them. Assuming non-adhesive, frictionless contact of self-affine surfaces, we derive the distribution of separations between surfaces near the contact edge. The distribution exhibits a power-law divergence for small gaps, and we use numerical simulations with fine resolution to confirm the scaling. The characteristic length scale over which the power-law regime persists is given by the product of the rms surface slope and the mean diameter of contacting regions. We show that these results remain valid for weakly adhesive contacts and connect these observations to recent theories for adhesion between rough surfaces. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Experimental evidence suggests that suction may play a role in the attachment strength of mushroom-tipped adhesive structures, but the system parameters which control this effect are not well established. A fracture mechanics-based model is introduced to determine the critical stress for defect propagation at the interface in the presence of trapped air. These results are compared with an experimental investigation of millimeter-scale elastomeric structures. These structures are found to exhibit a greater increase in strength due to suction than is typical in the literature, as they have a large tip diameter relative to the stalk. The model additionally provides insight into differences in expected behavior across the design space of mushroom-shaped structures. For example, the model reveals that the suction contribution is length-scale dependent. It is enhanced for larger structures due to increased volume change, and thus the attainment of lower pressures, inside of the defect. This scaling effect is shown to be less pronounced if the tip is made wider relative to the stalk. An asymptotic result is also provided in the limit that the defect is far outside of the stalk, showing that the critical stress is lower by a factor of 1/2 than the result often used in the literature to estimate the effect of suction. This discrepancy arises as the latter considers only the balance of remote stress and pressure inside the defect and neglects the influence of compressive tractions outside of the defect. 
    more » « less