skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Finding a Burst of Positives via Nonadaptive Semiquantitative Group Testing
Motivated by testing for pathogenic diseases we con- sider a new nonadaptive group testing problem for which: (1) positives occur within a burst, capturing the fact that infected test subjects often come in clusters, and (2) that the test outcomes arise from semiquantitative measurements that provide coarse information about the number of positives in any tested group. Our model generalizes prior work on detecting a single burst with classical group testing [1] to the setting of semiquantitative group testing (SQGT) [2]. Speci cally, we study the setting where the burst-length l is known and the semiquantitative tests provide potentially nonuniform estimates on the number of positives in a test group. The estimates represent the index of a quantization bin containing the (exact) total number of positives, for arbitrary thresholds η1,...,ηs. Interestingly, we show that the minimum number of tests needed for burst identi cation is essentially only a function of the largest threshold ηs. In this context, our main result is an order-optimal test scheme that can recover any burst of length l using roughly \ell/2\eta + log (n) measurements. This suggests that 2ηs s+1 a large saturation level ηs is more important than nely quantized information when dealing with bursts. We also provide results for related modeling assumptions and specialized choices of thresholds.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2107344
PAR ID:
10549928
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
IEEE
Date Published:
ISBN:
9781665475556
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Taipei, Taiwan
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Background: Results: To address these issues, we introduce a novel adaptive semi-quantitative group testing (SQGT) scheme to e ciently screen populations via two-stage qPCR testing. The SQGT method quantizes cycle threshold (Ct) values into multiple bins, leveraging the information from the rst stage of screening to improve the detection sensitivity. Dynamic Ct threshold adjustments mitigate dilution e ects and enhance test accuracy. Comparisons with traditional binary outcome GT methods show that SQGT reduces the number of tests by 24% on the only complete real-world qPCR group testing dataset from Israel, while maintaining a negligible false negative rate. Conclusion: In conclusion, our adaptive SQGT approach, utilizing qPCR data and dynamic threshold adjustments, o ers a promising solution for e cient population screening. With a reduction in the number of tests and minimal false negatives, SQGT holds potential to enhance disease control and testing strategies on a global scale. Keywords: Group testing, Pooled testing, Semiquantitative group testing, qPCR, Ct values, Viral load, COVID-19 
    more » « less
  2. Pe'er, I. (Ed.)
    Combinatorial group testing and compressed sensing both focus on recovering a sparse vector of dimensionality n from a much smaller number 𝑚<𝑛 of measurements. In the first approach, the problem is defined over the Boolean field – the goal is to recover a Boolean vector and measurements are Boolean; in the second approach, the unknown vector and the measurements are over the reals. Here, we focus on real-valued group testing setting that more closely fits modern testing protocols relying on quantitative measurements, such as qPCR, where the goal is recovery of a sparse, Boolean vector and the pooling matrix needs to be Boolean and sparse, but the unknown input signal vector and the measurement outcomes are nonnegative reals, and the matrix algebra implied in the test protocol is over the reals. With the recent renewed interest in group testing, focus has been on quantitative measurements resulting from qPCR, but the method proposed for sample pooling were based on matrices designed with Boolean measurements in mind. Here, we investigate constructing pooling matrices dedicated for the real-valued group testing. We provide conditions for pooling matrices to guarantee unambiguous decoding of positives in this setting. We also show a deterministic algorithm for constructing matrices meeting the proposed condition, for small matrix sizes that can be implemented using a laboratory robot. Using simulated data, we show that the proposed approach leads to matrices that can be applied for higher positivity rates than combinatorial group testing matrices considered for viral testing previously. We also validate the approach through wet lab experiments involving SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab samples. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Objective: Current guidance states that asymptomatic screening for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) prior to admission to an acute-care setting is at the facility’s discretion. This study’s objective was to estimate the number of undetected cases of SARS-CoV-2 admitted as inpatients under 4 testing approaches and varying assumptions. Design and setting: Individual-based microsimulation of 104 North Carolina acute-care hospitals Patients: All simulated inpatient admissions to acute-care hospitals from December 15, 2021, to January 13, 2022 [ie, during the SARS-COV-2 ο (omicron) variant surge]. Interventions: We simulated (1) only testing symptomatic patients, (2) 1-stage antigen testing with no confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test, (3) 1-stage antigen testing with a confirmatory PCR for negative results, and (4) serial antigen screening (ie, repeat antigen test 2 days after a negative result). Results: Over 1 month, there were 77,980 admissions: 13.7% for COVID-19, 4.3% with but not for COVID-19, and 82.0% for non–COVID-19 indications without current infection. Without asymptomatic screening, 1,089 (credible interval [CI], 946–1,253) total SARS-CoV-2 infections (7.72%) went undetected. With 1-stage antigen screening, 734 (CI, 638–845) asymptomatic infections (67.4%) were detected, with 1,277 false positives. With combined antigen and PCR screening, 1,007 (CI, 875–1,159) asymptomatic infections (92.5%) were detected, with 5,578 false positives. A serial antigen testing policy detected 973 (CI, 845–1,120) asymptomatic infections (89.4%), with 2,529 false positives. Conclusions: Serial antigen testing identified >85% of asymptomatic infections and resulted in fewer false positives with less cost per identified infection compared to combined antigen plus PCR testing. 
    more » « less
  4. Accurate detection of infected individuals is one of the critical steps in stopping any pandemic. When the underlying infection rate of the disease is low, testing people in groups, instead of testing each individual in the population, can be more efficient. In this work, we consider noisy adaptive group testing design with specific test sensitivity and specificity that select the optimal group given previous test results based on pre-selected utility function. As in prior studies on group testing, we model this problem as a sequential Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) to adaptively design the groups for each test. We analyze the required number of group tests when using the updated posterior on the infection status and the corresponding Mutual Information (MI) as our utility function for selecting new groups. More importantly, we study how the potential bias on the ground-truth noise of group tests may affect the group testing sample complexity. 
    more » « less
  5. High‐volume testing of clinical specimens for sexually transmitted diseases is performed frequently by a process known as group testing. This algorithmic process involves testing portions of specimens from separate individuals together as one unit (or “group”) to detect diseases. Retesting is performed on groups that test positively in order to differentiate between positive and negative individual specimens. The overall goal is to use the least number of tests possible across all individuals without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. One of the most efficient group testing algorithms is array testing. In its simplest form, specimens are arranged into a grid‐like structure so that row and column groups can be formed. Positive‐testing rows/columns indicate which specimens to retest. With the growing use of multiplex assays, the increasing number of diseases tested by these assays, and the availability of subject‐specific risk information, opportunities exist to make this testing process even more efficient. We propose specific specimen arrangements within an array that can reduce the number of retests needed when compared with other array testing algorithms. We examine how to calculate operating characteristics, including the expected number of tests and the SD for the number of tests, and then subsequently find a best arrangement. Our methods are illustrated for chlamydia and gonorrhea detection with the Aptima Combo 2 Assay. We also provide R functions to make our research accessible to laboratories. 
    more » « less