skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Higher semiadditive Grothendieck-Witt theory and the 𝐾(1)-local sphere
We develop a higher semiadditive version of Grothendieck-Witt theory. We then apply the theory in the case of a finite field to study the higher semiadditive structure of the K ( 1 ) K(1) -local sphere S K ( 1 ) \mathbb {S}_{K(1)} at the prime 2 2 , in particular realizing the non- 2 2 -adic rational element 1 + ε<#comment/> ∈<#comment/> π<#comment/> 0 S K ( 1 ) 1+\varepsilon \in \pi _0\mathbb {S}_{K(1)} as a “semiadditive cardinality.” As a further application, we compute and clarify certain power operations in π<#comment/> 0 S K ( 1 ) \pi _0\mathbb {S}_{K(1)} more » « less
Award ID(s):
2002029
PAR ID:
10552626
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
American Mathematical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Communications of the American Mathematical Society
Volume:
3
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2692-3688
Page Range / eLocation ID:
65 to 111
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. We introduce the notions of symmetric and symmetrizable representations of SL 2 ⁡<#comment/> ( Z ) {\operatorname {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})} . The linear representations of SL 2 ⁡<#comment/> ( Z ) {\operatorname {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})} arising from modular tensor categories are symmetric and have congruence kernel. Conversely, one may also reconstruct modular data from finite-dimensional symmetric, congruence representations of SL 2 ⁡<#comment/> ( Z ) {\operatorname {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})} . By investigating a Z / 2 Z \mathbb {Z}/2\mathbb {Z} -symmetry of some Weil representations at prime power levels, we prove that all finite-dimensional congruence representations of SL 2 ⁡<#comment/> ( Z ) {\operatorname {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})} are symmetrizable. We also provide examples of unsymmetrizable noncongruence representations of SL 2 ⁡<#comment/> ( Z ) {\operatorname {SL}_2(\mathbb {Z})} that are subrepresentations of a symmetric one. 
    more » « less
  2. We formulate and prove a Conner–Floyd isomorphism for the algebraic K-theory of arbitrary qcqs derived schemes. To that end, we study a stable ∞<#comment/> \infty -category of non- A 1 \mathbb {A}^1 -invariant motivic spectra, which turns out to be equivalent to the ∞<#comment/> \infty -category of fundamental motivic spectra satisfying elementary blowup excision, previously introduced by the first and third authors. We prove that this ∞<#comment/> \infty -category satisfies P 1 \mathbb {P}^1 -homotopy invariance and weighted A 1 \mathbb {A}^1 -homotopy invariance, which we use in place of A 1 \mathbb {A}^1 -homotopy invariance to obtain analogues of several key results from A 1 \mathbb {A}^1 -homotopy theory. These allow us in particular to define a universal oriented motivic E ∞<#comment/> \mathbb {E}_\infty -ring spectrum M G L \mathrm {MGL} . We then prove that the algebraic K-theory of a qcqs derived scheme X X can be recovered from its M G L \mathrm {MGL} -cohomology via a Conner–Floyd isomorphism\[ M G L ∗<#comment/> ∗<#comment/> ( X ) ⊗<#comment/> L Z [ β<#comment/> ±<#comment/> 1 ] ≃<#comment/> K ∗<#comment/> ∗<#comment/> ( X ) , \mathrm {MGL}^{**}(X)\otimes _{\mathrm {L}{}}\mathbb {Z}[\beta ^{\pm 1}]\simeq \mathrm {K}{}^{**}(X), \]where L \mathrm {L}{} is the Lazard ring and K p , q ( X ) = K 2 q −<#comment/> p ( X ) \mathrm {K}{}^{p,q}(X)=\mathrm {K}{}_{2q-p}(X) . Finally, we prove a Snaith theorem for the periodized version of M G L \mathrm {MGL}
    more » « less
  3. We formulate a plausible conjecture for the optimal Ehrhard-type inequality for convex symmetric sets with respect to the Gaussian measure. Namely, letting J k −<#comment/> 1 ( s ) = ∫<#comment/> 0 s t k −<#comment/> 1 e −<#comment/> t 2 2 d t J_{k-1}(s)=\int ^s_0 t^{k-1} e^{-\frac {t^2}{2}}dt and c k −<#comment/> 1 = J k −<#comment/> 1 ( + ∞<#comment/> ) c_{k-1}=J_{k-1}(+\infty ) , we conjecture that the function F : [ 0 , 1 ] →<#comment/> R F:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb {R} , given by F ( a ) = ∑<#comment/> k = 1 n 1 a ∈<#comment/> E k ⋅<#comment/> ( β<#comment/> k J k −<#comment/> 1 −<#comment/> 1 ( c k −<#comment/> 1 a ) + α<#comment/> k ) \begin{equation*} F(a)= \sum _{k=1}^n 1_{a\in E_k}\cdot (\beta _k J_{k-1}^{-1}(c_{k-1} a)+\alpha _k) \end{equation*} (with an appropriate choice of a decomposition [ 0 , 1 ] = ∪<#comment/> i E i [0,1]=\cup _{i} E_i and coefficients α<#comment/> i , β<#comment/> i \alpha _i, \beta _i ) satisfies, for all symmetric convex sets K K and L L , and any λ<#comment/> ∈<#comment/> [ 0 , 1 ] \lambda \in [0,1] , F ( γ<#comment/> ( λ<#comment/> K + ( 1 −<#comment/> λ<#comment/> ) L ) ) ≥<#comment/> λ<#comment/> F ( γ<#comment/> ( K ) ) + ( 1 −<#comment/> λ<#comment/> ) F ( γ<#comment/> ( L ) ) . \begin{equation*} F\left (\gamma (\lambda K+(1-\lambda )L)\right )\geq \lambda F\left (\gamma (K)\right )+(1-\lambda ) F\left (\gamma (L)\right ). \end{equation*} We explain that this conjecture is “the most optimistic possible”, and is equivalent to the fact that for any symmetric convex set K K , itsGaussian concavity power p s ( K , γ<#comment/> ) p_s(K,\gamma ) is greater than or equal to p s ( R B 2 k ×<#comment/> R n −<#comment/> k , γ<#comment/> ) p_s(RB^k_2\times \mathbb {R}^{n-k},\gamma ) , for some k ∈<#comment/> { 1 , …<#comment/> , n } k\in \{1,\dots ,n\} . We call the sets R B 2 k ×<#comment/> R n −<#comment/> k RB^k_2\times \mathbb {R}^{n-k} round k k -cylinders; they also appear as the conjectured Gaussian isoperimetric minimizers for symmetric sets, see Heilman [Amer. J. Math. 143 (2021), pp. 53–94]. In this manuscript, we make progress towards this question, and show that for any symmetric convex set K K in R n \mathbb {R}^n , p s ( K , γ<#comment/> ) ≥<#comment/> sup F ∈<#comment/> L 2 ( K , γ<#comment/> ) ∩<#comment/> L i p ( K ) : ∫<#comment/> F = 1 ( 2 T γ<#comment/> F ( K ) −<#comment/> V a r ( F ) ) + 1 n −<#comment/> E X 2 , \begin{equation*} p_s(K,\gamma )\geq \sup _{F\in L^2(K,\gamma )\cap Lip(K):\,\int F=1} \left (2T_{\gamma }^F(K)-Var(F)\right )+\frac {1}{n-\mathbb {E}X^2}, \end{equation*} where T γ<#comment/> F ( K ) T_{\gamma }^F(K) is the F −<#comment/> F- torsional rigidity of K K with respect to the Gaussian measure.Moreover, the equality holds if and only if K = R B 2 k ×<#comment/> R n −<#comment/> k K=RB^k_2\times \mathbb {R}^{n-k} for some R > 0 R>0 and k = 1 , …<#comment/> , n k=1,\dots ,n .As a consequence, we get p s ( K , γ<#comment/> ) ≥<#comment/> Q ( E | X | 2 , E ‖<#comment/> X ‖<#comment/> K 4 , E ‖<#comment/> X ‖<#comment/> K 2 , r ( K ) ) , \begin{equation*} p_s(K,\gamma )\geq Q(\mathbb {E}|X|^2, \mathbb {E}\|X\|_K^4, \mathbb {E}\|X\|^2_K, r(K)), \end{equation*} where Q Q is a certain rational function of degree 2 2 , the expectation is taken with respect to the restriction of the Gaussian measure onto K K , ‖<#comment/> ⋅<#comment/> ‖<#comment/> K \|\cdot \|_K is the Minkowski functional of K K , and r ( K ) r(K) is the in-radius of K K . The result follows via a combination of some novel estimates, the L 2 L2 method (previously studied by several authors, notably Kolesnikov and Milman [J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), pp. 1680–1702; Amer. J. Math. 140 (2018), pp. 1147–1185;Geometric aspects of functional analysis, Springer, Cham, 2017; Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 277 (2022), v+78 pp.], Kolesnikov and the author [Adv. Math. 384 (2021), 23 pp.], Hosle, Kolesnikov, and the author [J. Geom. Anal. 31 (2021), pp. 5799–5836], Colesanti [Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 (2008), pp. 765–772], Colesanti, the author, and Marsiglietti [J. Funct. Anal. 273 (2017), pp. 1120–1139], Eskenazis and Moschidis [J. Funct. Anal. 280 (2021), 19 pp.]), and the analysis of the Gaussian torsional rigidity. As an auxiliary result on the way to the equality case characterization, we characterize the equality cases in the “convex set version” of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality, and moreover, obtain a quantitative stability version in the case of the standard Gaussian measure; this may be of independent interest. All the equality case characterizations rely on the careful analysis of the smooth case, the stability versions via trace theory, and local approximation arguments. In addition, we provide a non-sharp estimate for a function F F whose composition with γ<#comment/> ( K ) \gamma (K) is concave in the Minkowski sense for all symmetric convex sets. 
    more » « less
  4. We show that if L 1 \mathcal {L}_1 and L 2 \mathcal {L}_2 are linear transformations from Z d \mathbb {Z}^d to Z d \mathbb {Z}^d satisfying certain mild conditions, then, for any finite subset A A of Z d \mathbb {Z}^d , | L 1 A + L 2 A | ≥<#comment/> ( | det ( L 1 ) | 1 / d + | det ( L 2 ) | 1 / d ) d | A | −<#comment/> o ( | A | ) . \begin{equation*} |\mathcal {L}_1 A+\mathcal {L}_2 A|\geq \left ( |\det (\mathcal {L}_1)|^{1/d}+|\det (\mathcal {L}_2)|^{1/d} \right )^d|A|- o(|A|). \end{equation*} This result corrects and confirms the two-summand case of a conjecture of Bukh and is best possible up to the lower-order term for certain choices of L 1 \mathcal {L}_1 and L 2 \mathcal {L}_2 . As an application, we prove a lower bound for | A + λ<#comment/> ⋅<#comment/> A | |A + \lambda \cdot A| when A A is a finite set of real numbers and λ<#comment/> \lambda is an algebraic number. In particular, when λ<#comment/> \lambda is of the form ( p / q ) 1 / d (p/q)^{1/d} for some p , q , d ∈<#comment/> N p, q, d \in \mathbb {N} , each taken as small as possible for such a representation, we show that | A + λ<#comment/> ⋅<#comment/> A | ≥<#comment/> ( p 1 / d + q 1 / d ) d | A | −<#comment/> o ( | A | ) . \begin{equation*} |A + \lambda \cdot A| \geq (p^{1/d} + q^{1/d})^d |A| - o(|A|). \end{equation*} This is again best possible up to the lower-order term and extends a recent result of Krachun and Petrov which treated the case λ<#comment/> = 2 \lambda = \sqrt {2}
    more » « less
  5. We prove a single-value version of Reshetnyak’s theorem. Namely, if a non-constant map f W l o c 1 , n ( Ω , R n ) f \in W^{1,n}_{\mathrm {loc}}(\Omega , \mathbb {R}^n) from a domain Ω R n \Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^n satisfies the estimate | D f ( x ) | n K J f ( x ) + Σ ( x ) | f ( x ) y 0 | n \lvert Df(x) \rvert ^n \leq K J_f(x) + \Sigma (x) \lvert f(x) - y_0 \rvert ^n at almost every x Ω x \in \Omega for some K 1 K \geq 1 , y 0 R n y_0\in \mathbb {R}^n and Σ L l o c 1 + ε ( Ω ) \Sigma \in L^{1+\varepsilon }_{\mathrm {loc}}(\Omega ) , then f 1 { y 0 } f^{-1}\{y_0\} is discrete, the local index i ( x , f ) i(x, f) is positive in f 1 { y 0 } f^{-1}\{y_0\} , and every neighborhood of a point of f 1 { y 0 } f^{-1}\{y_0\} is mapped to a neighborhood of y 0 y_0 . Assuming this estimate for a fixed K K at every y 0 R n y_0 \in \mathbb {R}^n is equivalent to assuming that the map f f is K K -quasiregular, even if the choice of Σ \Sigma is different for each y 0 y_0 . Since the estimate also yields a single-value Liouville theorem, it hence appears to be a good pointwise definition of K K -quasiregularity. As a corollary of our single-value Reshetnyak’s theorem, we obtain a higher-dimensional version of the argument principle that played a key part in the solution to the Calderón problem. 
    more » « less