skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


This content will become publicly available on December 1, 2025

Title: Networks as tools for defining emergent properties of microbiomes and their stability
Abstract The potential promise of the microbiome to ameliorate a wide range of societal and ecological challenges, from disease prevention and treatment to the restoration of entire ecosystems, hinges not only on microbiome engineering but also on the stability of beneficial microbiomes. Yet the properties of microbiome stability remain elusive and challenging to discern due to the complexity of interactions and often intractable diversity within these communities of bacteria, archaea, fungi, and other microeukaryotes. Networks are powerful tools for the study of complex microbiomes, with the potential to elucidate structural patterns of stable communities and generate testable hypotheses for experimental validation. However, the implementation of these analyses introduces a cascade of dichotomies and decision trees due to the lack of consensus on best practices. Here, we provide a road map for network-based microbiome studies with an emphasis on discerning properties of stability. We identify important considerations for data preparation, network construction, and interpretation of network properties. We also highlight remaining limitations and outstanding needs for this field. This review also serves to clarify the varying schools of thought on the application of network theory for microbiome studies and to identify practices that enhance the reproducibility and validity of future work.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2124922
PAR ID:
10556089
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
BMC
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Microbiome
Volume:
12
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2049-2618
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Phytobiomes Journal)
    null (Ed.)
    Microbial communities help plants access nutrients and tolerate stress. Some microbiomes are specific to plant genotypes and, therefore, may contribute to intraspecific differences in plant growth and be a promising target for plant breeding. Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) is a potential bioenergy crop with broad variation in yields and environmental responses; recent studies suggest that associations with distinct microbiomes may contribute to variation in cultivar yields. We used a common garden experiment to investigate variation in 12 mature switchgrass cultivar soil microbiomes and, furthermore, to examine how root traits and soil conditions influence microbiome structure. We found that average root diameter varied up to 33% among cultivars and that the cultivars also associated with distinct soil microbiomes. Cultivar had a larger effect on the soil bacterial than fungal community but both were strongly influenced by soil properties. Root traits had a weaker effect on microbiome structure but root length contributed to variation in the fungal community. Unlike the soil communities, the root bacterial communities did not group by cultivar, based on a subset of samples. Microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and the abundance of several dominant bacterial phyla varied between ecotypes but overall the differences in soil microbiomes were greater among cultivars than between ecotypes. Our findings show that there is not one soil microbiome that applies to all switchgrass cultivars, or even to each ecotype. These subtle but significant differences in root traits, microbial biomass, and the abundance of certain soil bacteria could explain differences in cultivar yields and environmental responses. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, New Phytologist)
    Summary Macroorganisms’ genotypes shape their phenotypes, which in turn shape the habitat available to potential microbial symbionts. This influence of host genotype on microbiome composition has been demonstrated in many systems; however, most previous studies have either compared unrelated genotypes or delved into molecular mechanisms. As a result, it is currently unclear whether the heritability of host‐associated microbiomes follows similar patterns to the heritability of other complex traits.We take a new approach to this question by comparing the microbiomes of diverse maize inbred lines and their F1hybrid offspring, which we quantified in both rhizosphere and leaves of field‐grown plants using 16S‐v4 and ITS1 amplicon sequencing.We show that inbred lines and hybrids differ consistently in the composition of bacterial and fungal rhizosphere communities, as well as leaf‐associated fungal communities. A wide range of microbiome features display heterosis within individual crosses, consistent with patterns for nonmicrobial maize phenotypes. For leaf microbiomes, these results were supported by the observation that broad‐sense heritability in hybrids was substantially higher than narrow‐sense heritability.Our results support our hypothesis that at least some heterotic host traits affect microbiome composition in maize. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, ISME Communications)
    Abstract The genomes of mitochondria and chloroplasts contain ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, reflecting their ancestry as free-living bacteria. These organellar rRNAs are often amplified in microbiome studies of animals and plants. If identified, they can be discarded, merely reducing sequencing depth. However, we identify certain high-abundance organeller RNAs not identified by common pipelines, which may compromise statistical analysis of microbiome structure and diversity. We quantified this by reanalyzing 7459 samples from seven 16S rRNA studies, including microbiomes from 927 unique animal genera. We find that under-annotation of cryptic mitochondrial and chloroplast reads affects multiple of these large-scale cross-species microbiome comparisons, and varies between host species, biasing comparisons. We offer a straightforward solution: supplementing existing taxonomies with diverse organelle rRNA sequences. This resolves up to 97% of unique unclassified sequences in some entire studies as mitochondrial (14% averaged across all studies), without increasing false positive annotations in mitochondria-free mock communities. Improved annotation decreases the proportion of unknown sequences by ≥10-fold in 2262 of 7459 samples (30%), spanning five of seven major studies examined. We recommend leveraging organelle sequence diversity to better identify organelle gene sequences in microbiome studies, and provide code, data resources and tutorials that implement this approach. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, Ecology and Evolution)
    Abstract As DNA sequencing technology continues to rapidly improve, studies investigating the microbial communities of host organisms (i.e., microbiota) are becoming not only more popular but also more financially accessible. Across many taxa, microbiomes can have important impacts on organismal health and fitness. To evaluate the microbial community composition of a particular microbiome, microbial DNA must be successfully extracted. Fecal samples are often easy to collect and are a good source of gut microbial DNA. Additionally, interest in the avian preen gland microbiome is rapidly growing, due to the importance of preen oil for many aspects of avian life. Microbial DNA extractions from avian fecal and preen oil samples present multiple challenges, however. Here, we describe a modified PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent microbial DNA extraction method that is less expensive than other commonly used methodologies and is highly effective for both fecal and preen oil samples collected from a broad range of avian species. We expect our method will facilitate microbial DNA extractions from multiple avian microbiome reservoirs, which have previously proved difficult and expensive. Our method therefore increases the feasibility of future studies of avian host microbiomes. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Ecology)
    Abstract Whole microbial communities regularly merge with one another, often in tandem with their environments, in a process called community coalescence. Such events impose substantial changes: abiotic perturbation from environmental blending and biotic perturbation of community merging. We used an aquatic mixing experiment to unravel the effects of these perturbations on the whole microbiome response and on the success of individual taxa when distinct freshwater and marine communities coalesce. We found that an equal mix of freshwater and marine habitats and blended microbiomes resulted in strong convergence of the community structure toward that of the marine microbiome. The enzymatic potential of these blended microbiomes in mixed media also converged toward that of the marine, with strong correlations between the multivariate response patterns of the enzymes and of community structure. Exposing each endmember inocula to an axenic equal mix of their freshwater and marine source waters led to a 96% loss of taxa from our freshwater microbiomes and a 66% loss from our marine microbiomes. When both inocula were added together to this mixed environment, interactions amongst the communities led to a further loss of 29% and 49% of freshwater and marine taxa, respectively. Under both the axenic and competitive scenarios, the diversity lost was somewhat counterbalanced by increased abundance of microbial taxa that were too rare to detect in the initial inocula. Our study emphasizes the importance of the rare biosphere as a critical component of microbial community responses to community coalescence. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email