skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Transcriptional regulators with broad expression in the zebrafish spinal cord
Abstract BackgroundThe spinal cord is a crucial part of the vertebrate CNS, controlling movements and receiving and processing sensory information from the trunk and limbs. However, there is much we do not know about how this essential organ develops. Here, we describe expression of 21 transcription factors and one transcriptional regulator in zebrafish spinal cord. ResultsWe analyzed the expression ofaurkb,foxb1a,foxb1b,her8a,homeza,ivns1abpb,mybl2b,myt1a,nr2f1b,onecut1,sall1a,sall3a,sall3b,sall4,sox2,sox19b,sp8b,tsc22d1,wdhd1,zfhx3b,znf804a, andznf1032in wild‐type andMIB E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1zebrafish embryos. While all of these genes are broadly expressed in spinal cord, they have distinct expression patterns from one another. Some are predominantly expressed in progenitor domains, and others in subsets of post‐mitotic cells. Given the conservation of spinal cord development, and the transcription factors and transcriptional regulators that orchestrate it, we expect that these genes will have similar spinal cord expression patterns in other vertebrates, including mammals and humans. ConclusionsOur data identify 22 different transcriptional regulators that are strong candidates for playing different roles in spinal cord development. For several of these genes, this is the first published description of their spinal cord expression.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1755340
PAR ID:
10559351
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Developmental Dynamics
Volume:
253
Issue:
11
ISSN:
1058-8388
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1036 to 1055
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Doe, Chirs (Ed.)
    Abstract BackgroundV0v spinal interneurons are highly conserved, glutamatergic, commissural neurons that function in locomotor circuits. We have previously shown that Evx1 and Evx2 are required to specify the neurotransmitter phenotype of these cells. However, we still know very little about the gene regulatory networks that act downstream of these transcription factors in V0v cells. MethodsTo identify candidate members of V0v gene regulatory networks, we FAC-sorted wild-type andevx1;evx2double mutant zebrafish V0v spinal interneurons and expression-profiled them using microarrays and single cell RNA-seq. We also used in situ hybridization to compare expression of a subset of candidate genes inevx1;evx2double mutants and wild-type siblings. ResultsOur data reveal two molecularly distinct subtypes of zebrafish V0v spinal interneurons at 48 h and suggest that, by this stage of development,evx1;evx2double mutant cells transfate into either inhibitory spinal interneurons, or motoneurons. Our results also identify 25 transcriptional regulator genes that require Evx1/2 for their expression in V0v interneurons, plus a further 11 transcriptional regulator genes that are repressed in V0v interneurons by Evx1/2. Two of the latter genes arehmx2andhmx3a. Intriguingly, we show that Hmx2/3a, repress dI2 interneuron expression ofskor1aandnefma, two genes that require Evx1/2 for their expression in V0v interneurons. This suggests that Evx1/2 might regulateskor1aandnefmaexpression in V0v interneurons by repressing Hmx2/3a expression. ConclusionsThis study identifies two molecularly distinct subsets of zebrafish V0v spinal interneurons, as well as multiple transcriptional regulators that are strong candidates for acting downstream of Evx1/2 to specify the essential functional characteristics of these cells. Our data further suggest that in the absence of both Evx1 and Evx2, V0v spinal interneurons initially change their neurotransmitter phenotypes from excitatory to inhibitory and then, later, start to express markers of distinct types of inhibitory spinal interneurons, or motoneurons. Taken together, our findings significantly increase our knowledge of V0v and spinal development and move us closer towards the essential goal of identifying the complete gene regulatory networks that specify this crucial cell type. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Ladybird homeobox (Lbx) transcription factors have crucial functions in muscle and nervous system development in many animals. Amniotes have two Lbx genes, but only Lbx1 is expressed in spinal cord. In contrast, teleosts have three lbx genes and we show here that zebrafish lbx1a, lbx1b and lbx2 are expressed by distinct spinal cell types, and that lbx1a is expressed in dI4, dI5 and dI6 interneurons, as in amniotes. Our data examining lbx expression in Scyliorhinus canicula and Xenopus tropicalis suggest that the spinal interneuron expression of zebrafish lbx1a is ancestral, whereas lbx1b has acquired a new expression pattern in spinal cord progenitor cells. lbx2 spinal expression was probably acquired in the ray-finned lineage, as this gene is not expressed in the spinal cords of either amniotes or S. canicula. We also show that the spinal function of zebrafish lbx1a is conserved with mouse Lbx1. In zebrafish lbx1a mutants, there is a reduction in the number of inhibitory spinal interneurons and an increase in the number of excitatory spinal interneurons, similar to mouse Lbx1 mutants. Interestingly, the number of inhibitory spinal interneurons is also reduced in lbx1b mutants, although in this case the number of excitatory interneurons is not increased. lbx1a;lbx1b double mutants have a similar spinal interneuron phenotype to lbx1a single mutants. Taken together these data suggest that lbx1b and lbx1a may be required in succession for correct specification of dI4 and dI6 spinal interneurons, although only lbx1a is required for suppression of excitatory fates in these cells. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract BackgroundMorphologic sex differences between males and females typically emerge after the primordial germ cell migration and gonad formation, although sex is determined at fertilization based on chromosome composition. A key debated sexual difference is the embryonic developmental rate, within vitroproduced male embryos often developing faster. However, the molecular mechanisms driving early embryonic sex differences remain unclear. ResultsTo investigate the transcriptional sex difference during early development,in vitroproduced bovine blastocysts were collected and sexed by PCR. A significant male-biased development was observed in expanded blastocysts. Ultra-low input RNA-seq analysis identified 837 DEGs, with 231 upregulated and 606 downregulated in males. Functional enrichment analysis revealed male-biased DEGs were associated with metabolic regulation, whereas female-biased DEGs were related to female gonad development, sex differentiation, inflammatory pathways, and TGF-beta signaling. Comparing X chromosome and autosome expression ratio, we found that female-biased DEGs contributed to the higher X-linked gene dosage, a phenomenon not observed in male embryos. Moreover, we identified the sex-biased transcription factors and RNA-bind proteins, including pluripotent factors such asSOX21andPRDM14, and splicing factorsFMR1andHNRNPH2. Additionally, we revealed 1,555 significantly sex-biased differential alternative splicing (AS), predominantly skipped exons, mapped to 906 genes, with 59 overlapping with DEGs enriched in metabolic and autophagy pathways. By incorporating novel isoforms from long reads sequencing, we identified 1,151 sex-biased differentially expressed isoforms (DEIs) associated with 1,017 genes. Functional analysis showed that female-biased DEIs were involved in the negative regulation of transcriptional activity, while male-biased DEIs were related to energy metabolism. Furthermore, we identified sex-biased differential exon usage inDENND1B, DIS3L2, DOCK11, IL1RAPL2,andZRSR2Y,indicating their sex-specific regulation in early embryo development. ConclusionThis study provided a comprehensive analysis of transcriptome differences between male and female bovine blastocysts, integrating sex-biased gene expression, alternative splicing, and isoform dynamics. Our findings indicate that enriched metabolism processes in male embryos may contribute to the faster developmental pace, providing insights into sex-specific regulatory mechanisms during early embryogenesis. Plain English summaryMale and female early embryos develop at different speeds, with male embryos often developing faster than female embryos. However, the reasons behind these early differences remain unclear. In this study, we examined gene activity in bovine embryos to uncover the biological factors regulating these early sex differences. We collected in vitro-produced bovine blastocysts, examined their sex, and confirmed that male embryos develop faster. By analyzing global gene activity, including alternative splicing, which allows one gene to code for multiple RNA isoforms and proteins, we found distinct gene expression profiles between male and female embryos. Male embryos showed higher activity in genes related to metabolism and cellular functions, while female embryos had increased activity in genes associated with female-specific gonad development and gene expression regulation. We also examined differences in how genes on the X chromosome were expressed. Female embryos had higher X-linked gene expression, which may contribute to sex-specific developmental regulation. Additionally, we identified sex-specific transcription factors and RNA-binding proteins that regulate early embryo development, some of which are known to control pluripotency and gene splicing. Overall, our study provides new insights into how gene activity shapes early sex differences, suggesting that enhanced metabolism in male embryos may be a key driver of their faster developmental rate. HighlightsMale embryos develop faster due to increased gene expression in metabolism pathwaysFemale embryos exhibit higher X-linked gene expression, suggesting X-dosage compensation plays a role in early developmentSex-biased alternative splicing events contribute to embryonic metabolism, autophagy, and transcriptional regulation in embryosSex-biased isoform diversity contributes to distinct developmental regulation in male and female embryosKey pluripotency factors (SOX21, PRDM14) and splicing regulators (FMR1, HNRNPH2) drive sex-specific gene expression 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Transcription factors that contain a homeodomain DNA-binding domain have crucial functions in most aspects of cellular function and embryonic development in both animals and plants. Hmx proteins are a subfamily of NK homeodomain-containing proteins that have fundamental roles in development of sensory structures such as the eye and the ear. However, Hmx functions in spinal cord development have not been analyzed. Here, we show that zebrafish (Danio rerio) hmx2 and hmx3a are coexpressed in spinal dI2 and V1 interneurons, whereas hmx3b, hmx1, and hmx4 are not expressed in spinal cord. Using mutational analyses, we demonstrate that, in addition to its previously reported role in ear development, hmx3a is required for correct specification of a subset of spinal interneuron neurotransmitter phenotypes, as well as correct lateral line progression and survival to adulthood. Surprisingly, despite similar expression patterns of hmx2 and hmx3a during embryonic development, zebrafish hmx2 mutants are viable and have no obviously abnormal phenotypes in sensory structures or neurons that require hmx3a. In addition, embryos homozygous for deletions of both hmx2 and hmx3a have identical phenotypes to severe hmx3a single mutants. However, mutating hmx2 in hypomorphic hmx3a mutants that usually develop normally, results in abnormal ear and lateral line phenotypes. This suggests that while hmx2 cannot compensate for loss of hmx3a, it does function in these developmental processes, although to a much lesser extent than hmx3a. More surprisingly, our mutational analyses suggest that Hmx3a may not require its homeodomain DNA-binding domain for its roles in viability or embryonic development. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract AimsDissecting complex interactions among transcription factors (TFs), microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are central for understanding heart development and function. Although computational approaches and platforms have been described to infer relationships among regulatory factors and genes, current approaches do not adequately account for how highly diverse, interacting regulators that include noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) control cardiac gene expression dynamics over time. MethodsTo overcome this limitation, we devised an integrated framework, cardiac gene regulatory modeling (CGRM) that integrates LogicTRN and regulatory component analysis bioinformatics modeling platforms to infer complex regulatory mechanisms. We then used CGRM to identify and compare the TF-ncRNA gene regulatory networks that govern early- and late-stage cardiomyocytes (CMs) generated by in vitro differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) and ventricular and atrial CMs isolated during in vivo human cardiac development. ResultsComparisons of in vitro versus in vivo derived CMs revealed conserved regulatory networks among TFs and ncRNAs in early cells that significantly diverged in late staged cells. We report that cardiac genes (“heart targets”) expressed in early-stage hPSC-CMs are primarily regulated by MESP1, miR-1, miR-23, lncRNAs NEAT1 and MALAT1, while GATA6, HAND2, miR-200c, NEAT1 and MALAT1 are critical for late hPSC-CMs. The inferred TF-miRNA-lncRNA networks regulating heart development and contraction were similar among early-stage CMs, among individual hPSC-CM datasets and between in vitro and in vivo samples. However, genes related to apoptosis, cell cycle and proliferation, and transmembrane transport showed a high degree of divergence between in vitro and in vivo derived late-stage CMs. Overall, late-, but not early-stage CMs diverged greatly in the expression of “heart target” transcripts and their regulatory mechanisms. ConclusionsIn conclusion, we find that hPSC-CMs are regulated in a cell autonomous manner during early development that diverges significantly as a function of time when compared to in vivo derived CMs. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using CGRM to reveal dynamic and complex transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory interactions that underlie cell directed versus environment-dependent CM development. These results with in vitro versus in vivo derived CMs thus establish this approach for detailed analyses of heart disease and for the analysis of cell regulatory systems in other biomedical fields. 
    more » « less