More Like this

1. Building an Effective Advisory Board for Grant Submissions

   https://doi.org/10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028430  

   Godwin, Allison; Karlin, Jennifer (October 2019, IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE))

   null (Ed.)

   This Special Session will engage engineering and computing education professionals in an interactive discussion of how to find and use the expertise of an advisory board when writing and executing funded projects. Our recent research of effective practices for supporting early career faculty in engineering education has shown that grant administration is an area that many faculty feel unprepared to manage. Beyond writing an excellent grant proposal, the skills required to carry out the planned grant activities are different from those addressed in existing professional development opportunities and are essential the success of a grant. This session will provide an interactive discussion and development of tools on one specific aspect of grant proposal writing and management—advisory boards. Advisory boards are an essential part of leveraging the expertise in the wider engineering education community, but there are various ways of strategically building and engaging advisory boards in grant work. The outcomes of this session will be a set of tools for faculty to use in building and leveraging the expertise of an advisory board in grant submissions. 

   more » « less
2. Approaches for Efficiently Identifying and Characterizing Student Need Assessments in Two-Year Colleges

   https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--55452  

   Krupczak, John; Brown, David; Chan_Hilton, Amy (June 2025, ASEE Conferences)

   This paper describes an approach that can be used by faculty and administrators to efficiently develop program-level student support plans to increase retention and completion in STEM disciplines. These recommendations were developed as part of a National Science Foundation-sponsored workshop intended to help two-year college faculty and administrators prepare proposals for the National Science Foundation Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (S-STEM) Program. S-STEM scholarship proposals are expected to be built on a foundation of deep needs analyses specific to the targeted population of students in STEM disciplines. Based on needs assessment, programs can then focus on implementing appropriate interventions that will be most effective in improving the retention and completion of their students. Guidelines for streamlining the acquisition and organization of critical elements of student needs analyses can be useful for two-year college faculty and administrators to develop NSF S-STEM proposals and any other initiatives they may pursue to improve student success at their institutions. Our approach recognizes that needs analysis benefits from three levels of data: institutional data, program-level data, and student-level data. Institutional-level data includes retention and completion data as well as results of institutional-level surveys of current students or alumni and the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Program-level data includes retention and completion data at the program level that may show significant differences from institutional results. In addition, program data should include course-level grades and failure rates, student GPA correlated with student program year, and student demographic data if available. The program data can help identify attrition points at the program level. Student data forms a third level that can clarify and focus student needs analyses. One aspect of student-level data is personal attributes associated with academic and career success in STEM fields. Examples include a growth mindset, stem identity, a sense of belonging, and academic self-efficacy. The validated surveys that exist to characterize these attributes are outlined in the paper. These surveys can be used at the program level to identify both baseline data and critical needs. In parallel with surveys, the creation of a student need archetype using techniques from the NSF I-Corps for Learning (I-Corps L) model can be used to elicit another dimension of challenges faced by students. The I-Corps for Learning model emphasizes the benefit of unstructured one-on-one informal interviews to elicit unscripted data from students to test assumptions and uncover opportunities for impact. The paper provides step-by-step guidelines for efficient implementation of I-Corps for Learning student needs discovery methods. In summary, even with external grant funding such as NSF S-STEM funds, student support initiatives must allocate available funds strategically to obtain the most impact. Collection of data at institutional, program, and student levels can facilitate the synthesis of a student-need archetype that supports faculty and administrative decision-makers. This paper aims to provide practical guidelines to two-year college faculty and administrators for creating a compelling student needs assessment and characterization of institutional context. 

   more » « less
3. Exposing postdocs to multiple institutional types: a PROMISE-ing intervention to prepare biomedical faculty

   https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1477538  

   Cresiski, Robin H; Ugarte, Fadel; Harris, LaKeisha; Clark, Jessica K (October 2024, Frontiers in Education)

   Bankston, Adriana (Ed.)

   Biomedical faculty positions require experience as a postdoctoral scholar (or “postdoc”). However, there is a current misalignment with postdoctoral training and workforce needs within higher education. The majority of postdocs are trained to be research faculty while completing fellowships at research-intensive universities, despite the fact that the majority of US higher educational institutions (where these postdocs may be employed) focus on undergraduate education. This leads to postdoctoral scholars not having the opportunity to gain exposure to different institutional types where they could be employed. Importantly, they also lack the opportunity to build a network or receive mentorship from faculty at non-R1 institutions. This may be particularly true of underrepresented scholars. In this brief report, we describe the practice of the NSF-funded PROMISE Academy Alliance to bridge this training gap and support greater preparation for faculty careers at an array of institutional types by leveraging collaboration within a state university system. A survey of PROMISE Academy Fellows about their structured experiences engaging with other campuses (e.g., campus tours, workshops, speaking opportunities) reveals that visits to other campuses within the state system are informative and impactful, both on their research and their employment interests. The positive findings can hopefully inspire easy-to-implement changes in postdoctoral support across other university systems or regional consortia. 

   more » « less
4. The Road to Strengthening 2-year Hispanic-Serving Institution Participation in the NSF ATE Funding Program

   Pickering, Cynthia K.; Craft, Elaine L.; VanIngen-Dunn, Caroline; DeWitt, Emery; Roberts, Richard H.; Slisz, Judith (July 2021, Research in healthcare financial management)

   null (Ed.)

   HSI ATE Hub is a three-year collaborative research project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) that joins two successful programs. Mentor-Connect mentors 2-year college faculty to develop competitive proposals for the NSF Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Program, and KickStarter facilitates strategic STEM assessment and planning to drive competitive STEM proposal development at 2-year Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs). The goal of HSI ATE Hub is to build capacity and leadership at 2-year HSIs for developing competitive ATE proposals to elevate 2-year HSIs as drivers of their community’s economic success via technician education. Data sets from three annual HSI ATE Hub Cohorts, four prior KickStarter Cohorts, and nine Mentor-Connect Cohorts have been aggregated to assess the following research questions about 2-year HSIs: Are there unique opportunities/barriers/challenges related to STEM program development and grant-writing endeavors for advanced technological education? How do we build capacity to pursue the opportunities and address the barriers/challenges? How do mentoring efforts/styles related to STEM program development and grant-writing need to differ for HSI faculty? What types of resources are relevant to the HSI ATE Community? This third paper in a series will report new data and incremental results from Year 3 of the HSI ATE Hub and a summary of results from the prior two years [1] [2]. These results include interactions with the HSI ATE community through intentional, expanded engagement to enhance learning from Latinx Advisory Council members and training webinars to develop educators’ acumen of culturally responsive instruction and high impact practices. Feedback from interviews and surveys with faculty at 2-year HSIs in HSI ATE Hub Cohorts 1-3 will be discussed to address research questions 1, 2, and 3. Evolved staging of resources relevant to the HSI ATE Community and related research directions for extending the project will address research question 4. 

   more » « less
5. The Road to Strengthening 2-year Hispanic-Serving Institution Participation in the NSF ATE Funding Program

   Pickering, Cynthia K.; Craft, Elaine L.; VanIngen-Dunn, Caroline; DeWitt, Emery; Roberts, Richard H.; Slisz, Judith (July 2021, ASEE Annual Conference proceedings)

   null (Ed.)

   HSI ATE Hub is a three-year collaborative research project funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) that joins two successful programs. Mentor-Connect mentors 2-year college faculty to develop competitive proposals for the NSF Advanced Technological Education (ATE) Program, and KickStarter facilitates strategic STEM assessment and planning to drive competitive STEM proposal development at 2-year Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs). The goal of HSI ATE Hub is to build capacity and leadership at 2-year HSIs for developing competitive ATE proposals to elevate 2-year HSIs as drivers of their community’s economic success via technician education. Data sets from three annual HSI ATE Hub Cohorts, four prior KickStarter Cohorts, and nine Mentor-Connect Cohorts have been aggregated to assess the following research questions about 2-year HSIs: Are there unique opportunities/barriers/challenges related to STEM program development and grant-writing endeavors for advanced technological education? How do we build capacity to pursue the opportunities and address the barriers/challenges? How do mentoring efforts/styles related to STEM program development and grant-writing need to differ for HSI faculty? What types of resources are relevant to the HSI ATE Community? This third paper in a series will report new data and incremental results from Year 3 of the HSI ATE Hub and a summary of results from the prior two years [1] [2]. These results include interactions with the HSI ATE community through intentional, expanded engagement to enhance learning from Latinx Advisory Council members and training webinars to develop educators’ acumen of culturally responsive instruction and high impact practices. Feedback from interviews and surveys with faculty at 2-year HSIs in HSI ATE Hub Cohorts 1-3 will be discussed to address research questions 1, 2, and 3. Evolved staging of resources relevant to the HSI ATE Community and related research directions for extending the project will address research question 4. 

   more » « less