An official website of the United States government
Experience management (EM) agents in multiplayer serious games face unique challenges and responsibilities regarding the fair treatment of players. One such challenge is the Greedy Bandit Problem that arises when using traditional Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs) as EM agents, which results in some players routinely prioritized while others may be ignored. We will show that this problem can be a cause of player non-adherence in a multiplayer serious game played by human users. To mitigate this effect, we propose a new bandit strategy, the Shapley Bandit, which enforces fairness constraints in its treatment of players based on the Shapley Value. We evaluate our approach via simulation with virtual players, finding that the Shapley Bandit can be effective in providing more uniform treatment of players while incurring only a slight cost in overall performance to a typical greedy approach. Our findings highlight the importance of fair treatment among players as a goal of multiplayer EM agents and discuss how addressing this issue may lead to more effective agent operation overall. The study contributes to the understanding of player modeling and EM in serious games and provides a promising approach for balancing fairness and engagement in multiplayer environments.
more »
« less
Investigating the Impact of Annotation Interfaces on Player Performance in Distributed Multiplayer Games
In distributed multiplayer games, it can be difficult to communicate strategic information for planning game moves and player interactions. Often, players spend extra time communicating, reducing their engagement in the game. Visual annotations in game maps and in the gameworld can address this problem and result in more efficient player communication. We studied the impact of real-time feedback on planning annotations, specifically two different annotation types, in a custom-built, third-person, multiplayer game and analyzed their effects on player performance, experience, workload, and annotation use. We found that annotations helped engage players in collaborative planning, which reduced frustration, and shortened goal completion times. Based on these findings, we discuss how annotating in virtual game spaces enables collaborative planning and improves team performance.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10564902
- Publisher / Repository:
- ACM
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 9781450356206
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 13
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- planning sensemaking collaboration coordination annotation game design distributed multiplayer games
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Montreal QC Canada
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In multiplayer games, players need to coordinate action to succeed. This paper investigates the effect of cognitive styles on performance of dyads engaged in collaborative gaming activities. 24 individuals took part in a mixed methods user-study; they were classified as field dependent (FD) or independent (FI) based on a cognitive style elicitation instrument. Three groups of teams were formed, based on the cognitive style of each team member: FD-FD, FD-FI, FI-FI. We examined performance in terms of game completion time, cognitive load, and player experience. The analysis revealed that FD-FI cognitive style had an effect on the performance and the mental load. We expect the findings to provide useful insight for practitioners and researchers on improving team collaboration in different contexts, such as learning, eSports, and disaster response.more » « less
-
Understanding players' mental models are crucial for game designers who wish to successfully integrate player-AI interactions into their game. However, game designers face the difficult challenge of anticipating how players model these AI agents during gameplay and how they may change their mental models with experience. In this work, we conduct a qualitative study to examine how a pair of players develop mental models of an adversarial AI player during gameplay in the multiplayer drawing game iNNk. We conducted ten gameplay sessions in which two players (n = 20, 10 pairs) worked together to defeat an AI player. As a result of our analysis, we uncovered two dominant dimensions that describe players' mental model development (i.e., focus and style). The first dimension describes the focus of development which refers to what players pay attention to for the development of their mental model (i.e., top-down vs. bottom-up focus). The second dimension describes the differences in the style of development, which refers to how players integrate new information into their mental model (i.e., systematic vs. reactive style). In our preliminary framework, we further note how players process a change when a discrepancy occurs, which we observed occur through comparisons (i.e., compare to other systems, compare to gameplay, compare to self). We offer these results as a preliminary framework for player mental model development to help game designers anticipate how different players may model adversarial AI players during gameplay.more » « less
-
In multiplayer collaborative games, players need to coordinate their actions and synchronize their efforts effectively to succeed as a team; thus, individual differences can impact teamwork and gameplay. This article investigates the effects of cognitive styles on teams engaged in collaborative gaming activities. Fifty-four individuals took part in a mixed-methods user study; they were classified as field-dependent (FD) or independent (FI) based on a field-dependent–independent (FD-I) cognitive-style-elicitation instrument. Three groups of teams were formed, based on the cognitive style of each team member: FD-FD, FD-FI, and FI-FI. We examined collaborative gameplay in terms of team performance, cognitive load, communication, and player experience. The analysis revealed that FD-I cognitive style affected the performance and mental load of teams. We expect the findings to provide useful insights on understanding how cognitive styles influence collaborative gameplay.more » « less
-
Current methods of measuring fairness in human-robot interaction (HRI) research often gauge perceptions of fairness at the conclu- sion of a task. However, this methodology overlooks the dynamic nature of fairness perceptions, which may shift and evolve as a task progresses. To help address this gap, we introduce a platform designed to help investigate the evolution of fairness over time: the Multiplayer Space Invaders game. This three-player game is structured such that two players work to eliminate as many of their own enemies as possible while a third player makes decisions about which player to support throughout the game. In this paper, we discuss different potential experimental designs facilitated by this platform. A key aspect of these designs is the inclusion of a robot that operates the supporting ship and must make multiple decisions about which player to aid throughout a task. We discuss how capturing fairness perceptions at different points in the game could give us deeper insights into how perceptions of fairness fluctuate in response to different variables and decisions made in the game.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173888
