An official website of the United States government
There have recently been calls for post-secondary engineering programs to develop more well-rounded engineers who are more capable of understanding and empathizing with clients, as well engage in stronger ethical decision-making. In this study, we examine the efficacy of a hybrid humanities-engineering course in developing the empathetic performativity of engineering students taught at two universities. We use a discourse analysis methodology to examine the language in student assignments over the trajectory of this course, looking for instances where engineering students position themselves empathetically within their work. Based on our analysis, we see small gains in the empathetic performances of engineering students in this context, however, these findings are nuanced and require qualification. Keywords: Discourse Analysis, Humanities-Driven STEM, Empathy
more »
« less
Efficacy of Humanities-Driven Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Curriculum on Integrating Empathy into Technology Design
There have recently been calls to consider the development of student empathy within engineering coursework. We argue that this goal may be reached by infusing more traditional engineering coursework with humanities. Our Humanities-Driven Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (HDSTEM) curriculum uses a humanities format as a context to discuss science and engineering advancement. The foundation of an HDSTEM curriculum is that it would reassert the importance of humans and human impact in science and engineering, while recognizing the social, political, and cultural catalysts and outcomes of technological innovation. Therefore, we hypothesize that through an HDSTEM curriculum, students will not only develop technically accurate solutions to problems posed in an engineering curriculum but will also question their ideas' impact on society. For this project, we draw on the case of an HDSTEM course, “World War II and Technology,” taught at Texas Tech University (TTU) and Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT). Specifically, we will present the analysis of linking specific problem-solving exercises and assignments that embed empathy with the delivery of the courses following an HDSTEM instruction modality. The problem-solving exercises and assignments incorporate the traditional Six Sigma define, measure, analyze, implement, and control (DMAIC) process. In these assignments, students were asked to reverse engineer technical, scientific, and logistical problems seen during World War II. In a more straightforward means to elicit empathy, students were assigned an additional empathize step with the DMAIC (EDMAIC) during two of these assignments. The empathize step was generic, asking students to take the perspective of the creators, users, and others affected by the problem and consider the societal needs and constraints of the time. Students completed four of these assignments (2 DMAICs bookending 2 (EDMAICs) throughout the course. Combining HDSTEM instruction modality and empathy problem-solving assignments, preliminary discourse analysis of assignments, which looks deeply at the language students used to create empathetic dispositions/identities within their work, revealed that students integrated empathy into technology design at various levels at both TTU and RIT. These disposition levels in empathy were observed and subjectively quantified using common rubrics. These outcomes result even from delivery at pre- and post-pandemic timeframes and at two institutions (i.e., the course was offered at TTU in the fall of 2019 and at RIT in the fall of 2022). In this consideration, the HDSTEM curriculum and empathy-embedded assignments have shown a cultivation of empathetic disposition among students. Further, based on these differing implementations, we will also present and comment on the experience of implementing the TTU course treatment at a new institution, RIT, to serve as a protocol in the future. These courses will be offered again in the fall of 2023 year to offer a comprehensive comparison between first-time (or one-off) in contrast to a sustained delivery of an HDSTEM curriculum.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2432771
- PAR ID:
- 10565065
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Society for Engineering Education
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Baltimore, MD
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In this presentation, we explore the lessons learned from two courses entitled “War, Machine, Culture, and Society: History and Engineering in the Second World War,” which integrate engineering problem-solving within a World War II history course. This comes as part of a larger project to bring the humanities and engineering into deeper conversation with one another. For this project, we are especially interested in the aspect of teaching aspect of such a course, wherein an engineering professor and humanities professor “share the stage” in a classroom, especially given that STEM disciplines and humanities disciplines present and value different kinds of knowledge. Frome a framework of “epistemological identity,” we use classroom observations, focus group data, and analysis of syllabi to probe into the ways that instructors from radically different disciplines develop coursework together and navigate the classroom space. For this WIP, we are currently engaged in the data collection and analysis phase, and anticipate being finished by the end of the semester. We believe this work has important implications as we see more work calling for inter/transdisciplinary considerations in engineering, the development of greater social and emotional skills for engineers, and various iterations of STEM plus the arts and humanities. As these movements continue to gain momentum, we will need to better understand how to better integrate various disciplines into engineering; this project will discuss difficulties and successes from practitioners doing this work, considering especially the ways that knowledge is constructed, conveyed, and valued by practitioners in the classroom.more » « less
-
Engineering education traditionally focuses on technical content and problem-solving, leaving little room in the curriculum to examine broader environmental and sociotechnical impacts of engineering work. However, if engineers wish to have intentional, positive influences on these broader impacts, skills for reflective thinking and ethical decision-making are essential. The arts and humanities can provide important and often neglected perspectives for engineers in developing such skills. In a recent seminar course for civil/environmental engineers, we explored ways of developing these skills through activities including Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS), in-class readings & discussions, essay writing, and portfolio assignments. In this paper, we present selected findings from this experimental course. While the class was small, comprised of a dozen graduate students, results were encouraging. For example, findings from qualitative thematic analysis of pre- and post-course essays showed an increase in recognition of the importance of breadth of knowledge and/or perspective. Similarly, pre-post Likert-type survey results showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.005, d=1, n=10) in Contextual Competence, a self-reported measure of ability to anticipate and understand the impacts and constraints of broader contexts on engineering solutions. These findings are preliminary but suggest the course helped students develop capacity for reflection through arts- and humanities-based activities.more » « less
-
This paper presents an innovative approach to improve engineering students’ problem-solving skills by implementing think-aloud exercises. Sometimes engineering students claim they do not know where to start with the problem-solving process, or they are not sure how to proceed to the next steps when they get stuck. A systematic training that focuses on the problem-solving process and the justification of each step could help. Think-aloud techniques help make the invisible mental processes visible to learners. Engineering think-aloud technique engages students and helps them make their way through a solving process step-by-step, reasoning along with them. In this study, a multiple faceted systematic approach that integrates think-aloud exercises through video assignments and oral exams were developed and implemented in two pilot engineering classes. We present our think-aloud exercises and oral exams structures in each of the courses and their impacts on students' learning outcomes, and students’ perceptions towards the pedagogical approach. Both quantitative and qualitative results show that the think-aloud exercise assignments and oral exams enhance students’ problem-solving skills and promote learning.more » « less
-
The University of South Carolina Engineering and Computing Living and Learning Community is focused on helping students succeed in their academic careers. For many years, program activities include a one-hour professional development course, linked coursework for mathematics and chemistry courses, and residence hall tutoring availability. Recent new supports for student retention will be discussed. These efforts include: 1. Early Move-In Boot camp - A short optional course helps students adjust to campus and form social networks while providing mathematics review and professional development information. 2. More linked courses - In addition to mathematics and chemistry, the living and learning community now has implemented linked humanities coursework in the spring so that students living together can take more courses with other residents. 3. Spring activities - Traditionally, most retention efforts have focused on acclimation in the Fall semester. New efforts help support students throughout their entire first year so that they have help in taking corrective actions. https://peer.asee.org/gifts-retention-improvement-efforts-in-the-undergraduate-living-and-learning-community-at-the-university-of-south-carolinamore » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Proceeding:
- The DOI is not currently available.
