skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026

Title: Socioeconomic indicators of resilience in Maine’s American lobster fishery
The American lobster (Homarus americanus) is an iconic component of the sociocultural and economic fabric of the state of Maine, where the commercial lobster fishery supports thousands of livelihoods. However, landings have recently declined, raising concerns about the long-term trajectory of the fishery, and highlighting the need for research to evaluate how changes to the fishery will impact harvesters and coastal communities. To address this need, we used a collaborative, mixed-methods approach to identify eight indicators that describe socioeconomic resilience in the lobster fishery from 2008 to 2022. Sufficient secondary data was available to fully quantify two of the indicators, coastal accessibility and operational condition, which track changes in housing availability and affordability, and the condition of a lobstermen’s business over time, respectively. We found spatial heterogeneity in the trends of both indicators over time, indicating that the socioeconomic impacts of changes to the fishery may vary along the coast. For example, coastal accessibility has declined in all coastal regions of Maine over time but the decline has been the most pronounced in the southern region. Our results lay the groundwork for continued development of socioeconomic indicators of resilience in Maine’s lobster fishery and can support the initiation of a long-term monitoring program to identify and respond to changes in socioeconomic condition of the lobster fleet. This research may also serve as a model for quantifying socioeconomic components of other fisheries around the world, many of which are facing an evolving landscape of social, economic, regulatory, and environmental shifts.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2220564
PAR ID:
10565886
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Elsevier
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Marine Policy
Volume:
173
Issue:
C
ISSN:
0308-597X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
106543
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Fisheries management Socioeconomic indicators American lobster Participatory research
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract For most of the past few decades, landings in the American lobster (Homarus americanus) fishery in Maine have been increasing, but a recent downturn in catch suggests the fishery may be at an inflection point. Drawing on multiple datasets associated with the fishery, we use this period of transition to review fleet dynamics in the fishery by analyzing how fishing effort has changed through time (2008–2022). When possible, age, gender, geography, and scale of fishing operation are considered to delimit intra-fleet differences. The results of this review reveal large-scale changes in intra-fleet dynamics that help to explain how there has been the appearance of fleet-wide stability for most of the 15-year study period despite mounting socioeconomic and environmental stressors. Changes in intra-fleet dynamics are most evident across geography and scale of fishing operation. In addition, this study finds that prior research has overestimated a key metric of fishing effort in the Maine lobster fishery by an order of magnitude. This latter insight bears significance because the lobster industry is under mounting pressure to reduce risk of gear interactions with large marine mammals, and future management decisions will likely hinge on estimates about fishing effort and the probability of marine mammal interactions. Continued efforts to understand fishing fleet dynamics and how they differ among segments of the fishery are vital to making well-informed policy decisions in the face of change, including the iconic Maine lobster fishery. 
    more » « less
  2. In recent decades, recruitment of young-of-year lobsters to benthic nursery habitats in the Gulf of Maine was regionally synchronized and exhibited correlative links with changes in the abundance of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus, a foundational zooplankton species of the pelagic food web. The spatial scale at which recruitment dynamics were correlated indicated that recruitment processes were not as strongly coupled to trends in spawner abundance as might be expected, but, rather, were influenced by common, ecosystem-scale processes. Here we explored how local- and basin-scale zooplankton dynamics and oceanographic indicators in the Gulf of Maine correlated with lobster settlement indices and each other since the late 1980s. Our analysis indicates that lobster settlement trends in southwestern Gulf of Maine study areas, from Midcoast Maine to Cape Cod Bay, tend to be significantly correlated with basin-wide C. finmarchicus dynamics and the composition of waters entering the Gulf of Maine through the Northeast Channel. In contrast, lobster settlement in the northeastern Gulf, from Penobscot Bay to the Bay of Fundy, tended to correlate more strongly to C. finmarchicus variability in the Bay of Fundy region, which was distinct in earlier years but converged with the broader basin-scale processes in the latter years. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the combined effect of climate-related declines in abundance and phenological shifts of C. finmarchicus have contributed to declines in lobster settlement over the past decade, and justify further research into the mechanisms of this interaction. These changes also align with the weakening influence of cold Labrador Slope Water and strengthening effects of warm Gulf Stream waters that precipitated an ecosystem-wide regime shift in the Gulf of Maine over the past decade and may have greater implications for lobster recruitment than previously suspected. 
    more » « less
  3. The emergence of ecosystem-based fisheries management (EBFM) has broadened the policy scope of fisheries management by accounting for the biological and ecological connectivity of fisheries. Less attention, however, has been given to the economic connectivity of fisheries. If fishers consider multiple fisheries when deciding where, when, and how much to fish, then management changes in one fishery can generate spillover impacts in other fisheries. Catch-share programs are a popular fisheries management framework that may be particularly prone to generating spillovers given that they typically change fishers’ incentives and their subsequent actions. We use data from Alaska fisheries to examine spillovers from each of the main catch-share programs in Alaska. We evaluate changes in participation—a traditional indicator in fisheries economics—in both the catch-share and non–catch-share fisheries. Using network analysis, we also investigate whether catch-share programs change the economic connectivity of fisheries, which can have implications for the socioeconomic resilience and robustness of the ecosystem, and empirically identify the set of fisheries impacted by each Alaska catch-share program. We find that cross-fishery participation spillovers and changes in economic connectivity coincide with some, but not all, catch-share programs. Our findings suggest that economic connectivity and the potential for cross-fishery spillovers deserve serious consideration, especially when designing and evaluating EBFM policies. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Resilience is the ability of ecosystems to maintain function while experiencing perturbation. Globally, forests are experiencing disturbances of unprecedented quantity, type, and magnitude that may diminish resilience. Early warning signals are statistical properties of data whose increase over time may provide insights into decreasing resilience, but there have been few applications to forests. We quantified four early warning signals (standard deviation, lag-1 autocorrelation, skewness, and kurtosis) across detrended time series of multiple ecosystem state variables at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA and analyzed how these signals have changed over time. Variables were collected over periods from 25 to 55 years from both experimentally manipulated and reference areas and were aggregated to annual timesteps for analysis. Long-term (>50 year) increases in early warning signals of stream calcium, a key biogeochemical variable at the site, illustrated declining resilience after decades of acid deposition, but only in watersheds that had previously been harvested. Trends in early warning signals of stream nitrate, a critical nutrient and water pollutant, likewise exhibited symptoms of declining resilience but in all watersheds. Temporal trends in early warning signals of some of groups of trees, insects, and birds also indicated changing resilience, but this pattern differed among, and even within, groups. Overall, ∼60% of early warning signals analyzed indicated decreasing resilience. Most of these signals occurred in skewness and kurtosis, suggesting ‘flickering’ behavior that aligns with emerging evidence of the forest transitioning into an oligotrophic condition. The other ∼40% of early warning signals indicated increasing or unchanging resilience. Interpretation of early warning signals in the context of system specific knowledge is therefore essential. They can be useful indicators for some key ecosystem variables; however, uncertainties in other variables highlight the need for further development of these tools in well-studied, long-term research sites. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Ecosystems across the United States are changing in complex ways that are difficult to predict. Coordinated long‐term research and analysis are required to assess how these changes will affect a diverse array of ecosystem services. This paper is part of a series that is a product of a synthesis effort of the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) network. This effort revealed that each LTER site had at least one compelling scientific case study about “what their site would look like” in 50 or 100 yr. As the site results were prepared, themes emerged, and the case studies were grouped into separate papers along five themes: state change, connectivity, resilience, time lags, and cascading effects and compiled into this special issue. This paper addresses the time lags theme with five examples from diverse biomes including tundra (Arctic), coastal upwelling (California Current Ecosystem), montane forests (Coweeta), and Everglades freshwater and coastal wetlands (Florida Coastal Everglades) LTER sites. Its objective is to demonstrate the importance of different types of time lags, in different kinds of ecosystems, as drivers of ecosystem structure and function and how these can effectively be addressed with long‐term studies. The concept that slow, interactive, compounded changes can have dramatic effects on ecosystem structure, function, services, and future scenarios is apparent in many systems, but they are difficult to quantify and predict. The case studies presented here illustrate the expanding scope of thinking about time lags within the LTER network and beyond. Specifically, they examine what variables are best indicators of lagged changes in arctic tundra, how progressive ocean warming can have profound effects on zooplankton and phytoplankton in waters off the California coast, how a series of species changes over many decades can affect Eastern deciduous forests, and how infrequent, extreme cold spells and storms can have enduring effects on fish populations and wetland vegetation along the Southeast coast and the Gulf of Mexico. The case studies highlight the need for a diverse set of LTER (and other research networks) sites to sort out the multiple components of time lag effects in ecosystems. 
    more » « less