An official website of the United States government
“Modeling” is a term that has several meanings in general, but particularly in mathematics. Here math modeling refers to the process of creating a mathematical representation of a real-world scenario to make a prediction or provide insight. There is a distinction between using a formula that arises from an application (for example, distance equals rate times time) and the actual creation of a mathematical relationship itself that can be useful in an applied setting. In this two part workshop, we demonstrate how to develop authentic math modeling challenge problems that are accessible and relevant to students. In the second part of the workshop we talk about how to facilitate math modeling so that students have an opportunity to be creative and innovative in their modeling process while having ownership over their solution.
more »
« less
Reconsidering task classification systems for situations that can be modelled with multiplication
Abstract To effectively teach modeling, instructors need to select tasks that allow students to learn which mathematical operations are appropriate for modeling different scenarios. Naturally, instructors might select tasks using a priori task classification systems—ones that group real-world problems for a given operation based on mathematical formalisms (e.g., as reported by Vergnaud (in: Hiebert (ed) Number concepts and operations in the middle grades, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1988). In this paper, we critique the robustness of a priori task classifications systems for guiding the selection of modeling tasks. We investigated the meanings undergraduate STEM majors attributed to multiplication while modeling a predator–prey system using differential equations. Through analysis of task-based clinical interviews with 23 participants, six distinct justifications forwhymultiplication was an appropriate operation for modeling the scenario were identified. These six justifications confirm that learners’ assimilation of scenarios to operations may differ from how educators classify problems using a priori classification schemes. Our findings challenge the use of a priori task classification systems for guiding the pedagogical selection of real-world scenarios to model because classifying real-world scenarios using a priori systems can overlook nuances in modelers’structuringandvalidating. We highlight the importance of these nuances for generating task trajectories that would leverage learners existing meanings for mathematical operations to build new associations between mathematical operations and novel problems. We end by suggesting a shift towards reasoning-based classification systems for selecting real-world scenarios to model—ones that are based on students reasoning about and within a scenario.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1750813
- PAR ID:
- 10569537
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ZDM – Mathematics Education
- Volume:
- 57
- Issue:
- 2-3
- ISSN:
- 1863-9690
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 411-424
- Size(s):
- p. 411-424
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Worthwhile problems: How teachers evaluate the instructional suitability of contextual algebra tasksLamberg, Teruni; Moss, Diana L (Ed.)We investigate the beliefs that influence middle and high school algebra teachers’ appraisals of contextual problems having diverse mathematical and pedagogical features. We asked six teachers to analyze six contextual algebra tasks and indicate how they would apportion instructional time among the six tasks based on their structure, pedagogical features, and connections to the real world. We recorded small-group discussions in which teachers shared their responses to this activity, and qualitatively analyzed their discussions for evidence of beliefs that influenced their appraisals of the tasks. The teachers’ beliefs about contextual problems attended to task authenticity, opportunities for mathematical activity, obligations of tasks, and pedagogy and access. Our preliminary findings can inform future efforts to equip teachers with contextual tasks that develop students’ algebraic reasoning and problem solving.more » « less
-
Driving safety is a top priority for autonomous vehicles. Orthogonal to prior work handling accident-prone traffic events by algorithm designs at the policy level, we investigate a Closed-loop Adversarial Training (CAT) framework for safe end-to-end driving in this paper through the lens of environment augmentation. CAT aims to continuously improve the safety of driving agents by training the agent on safety-critical scenarios that are dynamically generated over time. A novel resampling technique is developed to turn log-replay real-world driving scenarios into safety-critical ones via probabilistic factorization, where the adversarial traffic generation is modeled as the multiplication of standard motion prediction sub-problems. Consequently, CAT can launch more efficient physical attacks compared to existing safety-critical scenario generation methods and yields a significantly less computational cost in the iterative learning pipeline. We incorporate CAT into the MetaDrive simulator and validate our approach on hundreds of driving scenarios imported from real-world driving datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that CAT can effectively generate adversarial scenarios countering the agent being trained. After training, the agent can achieve superior driving safety in both log-replay and safety-critical traffic scenarios on the held- out test set. Code and data are available at https://metadriverse.github.io/cat.more » « less
-
In this chapter, we address the problem of why blockages occur during mathematization by introducing a method for studying mathematizing based in quantitative reasoning. We report on interview data with six tertiary STEM majors as they developed models of the population dynamics of cats and birds in a backyard habitat. Our analysis focused on real-world relationships participants tried to express when using a given arithmetic operation in a predator-prey modelling task. Our results reveal the conceptions of × participants used to justify their models when constructing an expression for the decrease in the bird population. We conclude by discussing the method’s utility for studying mathematization and with conjectures on how instructors might leverage participants’ justifications to scaffold their emergent models towards a conventionally correct model.more » « less
-
Abstract A tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entailsCritical thinking to link real-worldContexts to mathematicalConcepts supported by studentCollaboration and QRCompetencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.more » « less
