skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Students’ Sensemaking of Electrostatic Potential Maps within Substitution and Elimination Reactions
Reaction mechanisms are a difficult and foundational topic students encounter in organic chemistry. Consequently, students often memorize when attempting to learn the array of organic reactions. While interventions have been offered to encourage mechanistic reasoning as an alternative approach, a deeper struggle pertaining to students’ comprehension of the underlying chemical principles driving reaction mechanisms is still prevalent. In this study, electrostatic potential maps (EPMs) were explored as a tool students could use to reason with some of these principles to predict and explain the outcomes of a reaction. Through semistructured interviews, 19 students’ sense-making strategies were recorded and analyzed to uncover how they used the features of EPMs with concealed atomic identities and how they reconciled their answers once the identities were made explicit. Analysis revealed that the absence of atomic identities generated approaches centered around electron densities and their utility in predicting reaction mechanisms and outcomes. As the atomic identities were revealed, the majority of participants reverted to memorized mechanisms, while six participants attempted to relate the atomic identities to the interactions of the electron densities. These findings suggest utility in implementing EPMs in the organic chemistry curriculum and offer a feasible intervention to promote sense-making when students reason with organic reactions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2142324 2142311
PAR ID:
10571870
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Chemical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Chemical Education
Volume:
101
Issue:
9
ISSN:
0021-9584
Page Range / eLocation ID:
3713 to 3722
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Education in organic chemistry is highly reliant on molecular representations. Students abstract information from representations to make sense of submicroscopic interactions. This study investigates relationships between differing representations: bond-line structures, ball-and-stick, or electrostatic potential maps (EPMs), and predicting partial charges, nucleophiles, and electrophiles. The study makes use of students’ answers in hot-spot question format, where they select partially charged atoms on the image of a molecule and explanations. Analysis showed no significant difference among students when predicting a partially positive atom with each representation; however, more students with EPMs were able to correctly predict the partially negative atom. No difference was observed across representations in students predicting electrophilic character; while representations did influence students identifying nucleophilic character. The affordance of EPMs was that they cued more students to cite relative electronegativity indicating that such students were able to recognize the cause for electron rich/poor areas. This recognition is central to rationalizing mechanisms in organic chemistry. This study offers implications on incorporating EPMs during instruction and provides evidence-based support in how EPMs could be useful in promoting learning on topics that relate to an uneven charge distribution. 
    more » « less
  2. Instructional materials in organic chemistry include a wide variety of representations, such as chemical formulas, line-angle diagrams, ball-and-stick diagrams, and electrostatic potential maps (EPMs). Students tend to focus on explicit features of a representation while they are reasoning about chemical concepts. This study examined the affordances of electrostatic potential maps in students’ approaches when the maps were integrated into four foundational organic chemistry problems using an experimental design approach. First-semester organic chemistry students were surveyed from two different institutions, where they made predictions and explained their reasoning behind identifying an electrophilic site, predicting the product, selecting the faster reaction, and classifying a mechanism. Students were randomly assigned to one of four surveys that differed by the representation they were given for the prompts: chemical formula, line-angle diagram, ball-and-stick diagram, and EPM. Responses from students with EPMs were analyzed and compared to responses from students with the non-EPM representations. Results indicated that students with EPMs had higher performance depending on the problem. They were also more likely to cite electronic features such as electron density, nucleophilicity, etc., and were more likely to use causal reasoning in their explanations. This study offers evidence in support of affordances of EPMs in promoting students’ use of electronic features and causal reasoning. This evidence adds to the chemistry education literature by offering a potential means for promoting students’ use of electronic features and causal reasoning by incorporating EPMs into assessment items. Implications for instruction include using EPMs in both instruction and assessment as a tool to help students build skills around invoking electrostatics and causal reasoning to solve problems in organic chemistry. 
    more » « less
  3. Electrostatic potential maps (EPM) have the potential to support organic chemistry students in seeing reaction mechanisms through the perspective of electrostatic attraction. Prior to any pedagogical changes, foundational knowledge on how students use EPMs in particular contexts would be needed to inform how to integrate EPMs into instruction. This study describes an exploration into how organic chemistry students use EPMs during two card sort tasks. Seventeen undergraduate organic chemistry students participated in an interview that included an open and closed card sort. The interviews were inductively coded to identify students’ usage of EPMs, and usage change based on the open sort compared to the closed sort. Viewed from a resources framework, this study demonstrated how students’ use of EPMs shifted depending on the task structure. Variations were observed both among students and within students between tasks in terms of whether EPMs were utilized and when utilized whether information from EPMs were used in isolation or integrated with other chemistry concepts. The results of this study imply that more formal integration of EPMs into instruction and assessment would be needed for students who did not use EPMs. Instruction that models and assesses translation of representations may begin activating a more integrated perspective of EPMs which could be productive for students who had an isolated use of EPMs. The introduction of EPMs independent of specific chemistry tasks (e.g.during a general introduction of molecular representations) could lead some students to focus only on explicit features of the EPM representation and not tie features of the representation to their existing chemical knowledge. 
    more » « less
  4. Organic chemistry students often struggle with reaction mechanisms, particularly in how they are proposed and justified. In this activity targeting second year organic undergraduates, students used infrared spectroscopy (IR) to track the reaction progress of two distinct aldol reactions and used polarimetry to analyze the stereoselectivity of aldol catalysts. Students worked in two pairs, with one focusing on the traditional hydroxide-catalyzed aldol reaction (two units of propionaldehyde combining via an enolate intermediate) and the other focusing on the enantioselective l-proline-catalyzed aldol reaction (propionaldehyde catalyzed by l-proline, showing an iminium intermediate). During the course of the lab period, students used IR spectra showing kinetic data and guided questions to propose and validate the reaction mechanisms. After the pairs of students analyzed their individual reactions, they formed groups of four to further analyze and compare the two mechanisms. This comparison of IR and polarimetry data allowed students to discuss both pathways and consider why chemists use different reaction conditions to reach the same product. The focus of this experiment is to improve the understanding of reaction mechanisms and the process by which scientists propose and justify mechanisms, while giving students practical experience with IR spectroscopy, polarimetry, and intermediate analysis. 
    more » « less
  5. This study is a follow up to two earlier studies characterizing student real-time use of mechanistic arrows. In these previous studies, students were asked to predict a product by drawing a curved arrow mechanism using an interface that allowed recording and replay of student actions. In the present study two different student cohorts responded to the same tasks as the original studies: a cohort who were enrolled in a traditional organic course, and a cohort who were part of a transformed organic course (Organic Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything, OCLUE). Both cohorts improved in their ability to predict an appropriate product over the two semesters, and we found little meaningful difference in the ability of students from either cohort to predict the outcome of a familiar reaction. However, students in the OCLUE cohort were more likely to draw mechanistic arrows than the students from the traditional course. In contrast, when the task involved predicting the product of an unfamiliar reaction, OCLUE students were over three times more likely to draw mechanistically reasonable steps and produce a plausible product than students from the traditional cohort. We propose that the differences between the two cohorts emerge from the following: (1) explicit attempts in the OCLUE course to link drawing reactions mechanisms using the electron pushing formalism to the scientific practice of constructing explanations. It is our contention that this approach changes the arrow pushing mechanism from a skill to the construction of a model which students can use to predict and explain outcomes; and (2) the numerous opportunities in the OCLUE course to try out ideas without penalty, leading to a willingness to try to determine outcomes in unfamiliar situations. 
    more » « less