More Like this

1. Experimental transplants demonstrate shifts in predation favour evolution of aggressive behaviours in Trinidadian killifish

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.14724  

   Korte, Meghan; Walsh, Matthew R (February 2025, Functional Ecology)

   Abstract Theory asserts larger brains facilitate behaviours that enhance fitness. Research has demonstrated that increased brain size improves cognition and survival. However, the majority of research has focused on cross‐species comparisons. Experiments that manipulate selection to investigate the connection between brain size, behaviour and fitness are needed.Trinidadian killifish (Anablepsoides hartii) live in communities with (high predation: HP) and without (killifish only: KO) predators. Predator absence is associated with high population densities, increased intraspecific competition and evolved larger brain sizes.We tested for evolutionary shifts in behaviour by subjecting second‐generation lab‐reared killifish to a mirror aggression assay. We also quantify selection on brain size and behaviour by transplanting wild HP killifish to KO sites and tracking individual fitness (growth rates) with a mark‐recapture design.Lab‐reared killifish from KO sites—specifically males—exhibited higher levels of aggression than HP killifish. In the transplant experiment, HP killifish exhibited strong increases in aggression following the introduction to KO sites. Increased brain size was correlated with increased growth in transplanted HP killifish, yet there was no association between brain size, aggression and growth.Our results indicate that declines in predation and increased competition favour increases in aggression but further research is needed to determine if and how brain size and behaviour are linked through natural selection. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog. 

   more » « less
2. Does the evolution of ontogenetic niche shifts favour species coexistence? An empirical test in Trinidadian streams

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13912  

   Anaya‐Rojas, Jaime M.; Bassar, Ronald D.; Matthews, Blake; Goldberg, Joshua F.; King, Leighton; Reznick, David; Travis, Joseph (March 2023, Journal of Animal Ecology)

   Abstract A major question in ecology is how often competing species evolve to reduce competitive interactions and facilitate coexistence. One untested route for a reduction in competitive interactions is through ontogenetic changes in the trophic niche of one or more of the interacting species. In such cases, theory predicts that two species can coexist if the weaker competitor changes its resource niche to a greater degree with increased body size than the superior competitor.We tested this prediction using stable isotopes that yield information about the trophic position (δ¹⁵N) and carbon source (δ¹³C) of two coexisting fish species: Trinidadian guppiesPoecilia reticulataand killifishRivulus hartii.We examined fish from locations representing three natural community types: (1) where killifish and guppies live with predators, (2) where killifish and guppies live without predators and (3) where killifish are the only fish species. We also examined killifish from communities in which we had introduced guppies, providing a temporal sequence of the community changes following the transition from a killifish only to a killifish–guppy community.We found that killifish, which are the weaker competitor, had a much larger ontogenetic niche shift in trophic position than guppies in the community where competition is most intense (killifish–guppy only). This result is consistent with theory for size‐structured populations, which predicts that these results should lead to stable coexistence of the two species. Comparisons with other communities containing guppies, killifish and predators and ones where killifish live by themselves revealed that these results are caused primarily by a loss of ontogenetic niche changes in guppies, even though they are the stronger competitor. Comparisons of these natural communities with communities in which guppies were translocated into sites containing only killifish showed that the experimental communities were intermediate between the natural killifish–guppy community and the killifish–guppy–predator community, suggesting contemporary evolution in these ontogenetic trophic differences.These results provide comparative evidence for ontogenetic niche shifts in contributing to species coexistence and comparative and experimental evidence for evolutionary or plastic changes in ontogenetic niche shifts following the formation of new communities. 

   more » « less
3. Natural selection favours a larger eye in response to increased competition in natural populations of a vertebrate

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13334  

   Beston, Shannon M.; Walsh, Matthew R.; Higham, ed., Timothy (April 2019, Functional Ecology)

   Abstract Eye size varies notably across taxa. Much work suggests that this variation is driven by contrasting ecological selective pressures. However, evaluations of the relationship between ecological factors and shifts in eye size have largely occurred at the macroevolutionary scale. Experimental tests in nature are conspicuously absent.Trinidadian killifish,Rivulus hartii, are found across fish communities that differ in predation intensity. We recently showed that increased predation is associated with the evolution of a smaller eye. Here, we test how divergent predatory regimes alter the trajectory of eye size evolution using comparative mark–recapture experiments in multiple streams.We found that increases in eye size are associated with enhanced survival, irrespective of predation intensity. More importantly, eye size is associated with enhanced growth in communities that lack predators, while this trend is absent when predators are present.Such results argue that increased competition for food in sites that lack predators is the key driver of eye size evolution. Aplain language summaryis available for this article. 

   more » « less
4. Simultaneous warming and acidification limit population fitness and reveal phenotype costs for a marine copepod

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2023.1033  

   deMayo, James A; Brennan, Reid S; Pespeni, Melissa H; Finiguerra, Michael; Norton, Lydia; Park, Gihong; Baumann, Hannes; Dam, Hans G (September 2023, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)

   Phenotypic plasticity and evolutionary adaptation allow populations to cope with global change, but limits and costs to adaptation under multiple stressors are insufficiently understood. We reared a foundational copepod species,Acartia hudsonica, under ambient (AM), ocean warming (OW), ocean acidification (OA), and combined ocean warming and acidification (OWA) conditions for 11 generations (approx. 1 year) and measured population fitness (net reproductive rate) derived from six life-history traits (egg production, hatching success, survival, development time, body size and sex ratio). Copepods under OW and OWA exhibited an initial approximately 40% fitness decline relative to AM, but fully recovered within four generations, consistent with an adaptive response and demonstrating synergy between stressors. At generation 11, however, fitness was approximately 24% lower for OWA compared with the AM lineage, consistent with the cost of producing OWA-adapted phenotypes. Fitness of the OWA lineage was not affected by reversal to AM or low food environments, indicating sustained phenotypic plasticity. These results mimic those of a congener,Acartia tonsa, while additionally suggesting that synergistic effects of simultaneous stressors exert costs that limit fitness recovery but can sustain plasticity. Thus, even when closely related species experience similar stressors, species-specific costs shape their unique adaptive responses. 

   more » « less
5. Individual variation in plasticity dulls transgenerational responses to stress

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13409  

   Gillis, Michael K.; Walsh, Matthew R.; Pfrender, ed., Michael (August 2019, Functional Ecology)

   Abstract Much research has shown that environmental stress can induce adaptive and maladaptive phenotypic changes in organisms that persist for multiple generations. Such transgenerational phenotypic plasticity shrouds our understanding of the long‐term consequences of ongoing anthropogenic pressures.Here, we evaluated within‐ and transgenerational phenotypic responses to food stress in the freshwater crustacean,Daphnia. We reared 45 clones ofDaphnia pulicariaeach on high‐qualityScenedesmusand low‐quality (but also non‐toxic) cyanobacteria (generation 1). Offspring produced by generation 1 adults were then reared onScenedesmus(generation 2), and life‐history traits were measured across both generations.The results show thatDaphniain generation 1 exhibited reduced fitness (i.e., delayed maturation, lower reproductive output, increased clutch interval) when reared in the presence of cyanobacteria as opposed to high‐quality food. However, maternal stress had no clear influence on the fitness of offspring. That is,Daphniain the second experimental generation had similar mean trait values, irrespective of whether their mothers were reared on cyanobacteria or high‐quality food.Signals of transgenerational life‐history effects were obscured, in part, by extensive clonal variation amongDaphniain the direction of transgenerational responses to cyanobacteria (i.e., adaptive and maladaptive plasticity). Further analyses demonstrated that such individual variance in plasticity might be open to selection and potentially offer a means of contemporary adaptation to cyanobacteria. Taken together, our results denote a link between the overall strength of transgenerational responses to the environment and the potential for rapid evolution in populations. A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article. 

   more » « less