skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


This content will become publicly available on August 20, 2025

Title: High-throughput affinity measurements of direct interactions between activation domains and co-activators
Abstract Sequence-specific activation by transcription factors is essential for gene regulation1,2. Key to this are activation domains, which often fall within disordered regions of transcription factors3,4and recruit co-activators to initiate transcription5. These interactions are difficult to characterize via most experimental techniques because they are typically weak and transient6,7. Consequently, we know very little about whether these interactions are promiscuous or specific, the mechanisms of binding, and how these interactions tune the strength of gene activation. To address these questions, we developed a microfluidic platform for expression and purification of hundreds of activation domains in parallel followed by direct measurement of co-activator binding affinities (STAMMPPING, for Simultaneous Trapping of Affinity Measurements via a Microfluidic Protein-Protein INteraction Generator). By applying STAMMPPING to quantify direct interactions between eight co-activators and 204 human activation domains (>1,500Kds), we provide the first quantitative map of these interactions and reveal 334 novel binding pairs. We find that the metazoan-specific co-activator P300 directly binds >100 activation domains, potentially explaining its widespread recruitment across the genome to influence transcriptional activation. Despite sharing similar molecular properties (e.g.enrichment of negative and hydrophobic residues), activation domains utilize distinct biophysical properties to recruit certain co-activator domains. Co-activator domain affinity and occupancy are well-predicted by analytical models that account for multivalency, andin vitroaffinities quantitatively predict activation in cells with an ultrasensitive response. Not only do our results demonstrate the ability to measure affinities between even weak protein-protein interactions in high throughput, but they also provide a necessary resource of over 1,500 activation domain/co-activator affinities which lays the foundation for understanding the molecular basis of transcriptional activation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2142336
PAR ID:
10572681
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
bioRxiv
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Institution:
bioRxiv
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. (, Nature structural molecular biology)
    Sara Osman Carolina Perdigoto (Ed.)
    Gene expression in all eukaryotes depends critically on the function of transcriptional activation domains of gene activator proteins. The conventional model for activation domain (AD) function is the direct physical recruitment of specific coactivators and transcriptional machinery components. However, ADs are short and astronomically variable sequences, with up to 10^24 possible interchangeable sequence variants for a single gene activator; each variant is intrinsically disordered in structure and interacts with its targets with low specificity and affinity. How these peptides recruit their targets is becoming increasingly difficult to explain, exposing a massive knowledge gap in molecular biology. Here, we show that the single required characteristic of ADs—consistent with their extreme variability, intrinsic structural disorder, and near-stochastic interaction mode—is an amphiphilic aromatic–acidic surfactant-like property. We propose that the AD surfactant, by triggering the local gene-promoter chromatin phase transition, catalyzes the formation of “transcription factory” condensates. We demonstrate that the presence of tryptophan and aspartic acid residues in the AD sequence is sufficient for in vivo functionality, even when present only as a single pair of residues within a 20-amino-acid sequence containing nothing more than additional 18 glycine residues. We demonstrate that the amphipathic α-helix structure, suggested previously as beneficial for AD function, is actually detrimental, and breaking this helix by inserting prolines significantly increases activation domain functionality. The proposed surfactant action mechanism based on near-stochastic interactions implied by the minimalistic activation domains changes not only the paradigm for the explanation of gene activation but also the fundamental biochemistry paradigm based on the specificity of sequence-to-structure-to-functional-interaction. The mechanism of activity regulation by near-stochastic allosteric interactions could easily be applied to other biological processes. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, eLife)
    null (Ed.)
    Cells adapt and respond to changes by regulating the activity of their genes. To turn genes on or off, they use a family of proteins called transcription factors. Transcription factors influence specific but overlapping groups of genes, so that each gene is controlled by several transcription factors that act together like a dimmer switch to regulate gene activity. The presence of transcription factors attracts proteins such as the Mediator complex, which activates genes by gathering the protein machines that read the genes. The more transcription factors are found near a specific gene, the more strongly they attract Mediator and the more active the gene is. A specific region on the transcription factor called the activation domain is necessary for this process. The biochemical sequences of these domains vary greatly between species, yet activation domains from, for example, yeast and human proteins are often interchangeable. To understand why this is the case, Sanborn et al. analyzed the genome of baker’s yeast and identified 150 activation domains, each very different in sequence. Three-quarters of them bound to a subunit of the Mediator complex called Med15. Sanborn et al. then developed a machine learning algorithm to predict activation domains in both yeast and humans. This algorithm also showed that negatively charged and greasy regions on the activation domains were essential to be activated by the Mediator complex. Further analyses revealed that activation domains used different poses to bind multiple sites on Med15, a behavior known as ‘fuzzy’ binding. This creates a high overall affinity even though the binding strength at each individual site is low, enabling the protein complexes to remain dynamic. These weak interactions together permit fine control over the activity of several genes, allowing cells to respond quickly and precisely to many changes. The computer algorithm used here provides a new way to identify activation domains across species and could improve our understanding of how living things grow, adapt and evolve. It could also give new insights into mechanisms of disease, particularly cancer, where transcription factors are often faulty. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Current Opinion in Structural Biology)
    Eukaryotic transcription factors activate gene expression with their DNA-binding domains and activation domains. DNA- binding domains bind the genome by recognizing structurally related DNA sequences; they are structured, conserved, and predictable from protein sequences. Activation domains recruit chromatin modifiers, coactivator complexes, or basal tran- scriptional machinery via structurally diverse protein-protein interactions. Activation domains and DNA-binding domains have been called independent, modular units, but there are many departures from modularity, including interactions be- tween these regions and overlap in function. Compared to DNA-binding domains, activation domains are poorly under- stood because they are poorly conserved, intrinsically disor- dered, and difficult to predict from protein sequences. This review, organized around commonly asked questions, de- scribes recent progress that the field has made in under- standing the sequence features that control activation domains and predicting them from sequence. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Genetics)
    Kaplan, C D (Ed.)
    Abstract Drosophila Heterochromatin Protein 1a (HP1a) is essential for heterochromatin formation and is involved in transcriptional silencing. However, certain loci require HP1a to be transcribed. One model posits that HP1a acts as a transcriptional silencer within euchromatin while acting as an activator within heterochromatin. However, HP1a has been observed as an activator of a set of euchromatic genes. Therefore, it is not clear whether, or how, chromatin context informs the function of HP1 proteins. To understand the role of HP1 proteins in transcription, we examined the genome-wide binding profile of HP1a as well as two other Drosophila HP1 family members, HP1B and HP1C, to determine whether coordinated binding of these proteins is associated with specific transcriptional outcomes. We found that HP1 proteins share many of their endogenous binding targets. These genes are marked by active histone modifications and are expressed at higher levels than nontarget genes in both heterochromatin and euchromatin. In addition, HP1 binding targets displayed increased RNA polymerase pausing compared with nontarget genes. Specifically, colocalization of HP1B and HP1C was associated with the highest levels of polymerase pausing and gene expression. Analysis of HP1 null mutants suggests these proteins coordinate activity at transcription start sites to regulate transcription. Depletion of HP1B or HP1C alters expression of protein-coding genes bound by HP1 family members. Our data broaden understanding of the mechanism of transcriptional activation by HP1a and highlight the need to consider particular protein–protein interactions, rather than broader chromatin context, to predict impacts of HP1 at transcription start sites. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Nature)
    Gene expression in Arabidopsis is regulated by more than 1,900 transcription factors (TFs), which have been identified genome-wide by the presence of well-conserved DNA-binding domains. Activator TFs contain activation domains (ADs) that recruit coactivator complexes; however, for nearly all Arabidopsis TFs, we lack knowledge about the presence, location and transcriptional strength of their ADs1. To address this gap, here we use a yeast library approach to experimentally identify Arabidopsis ADs on a proteome-wide scale, and find that more than half of the Arabidopsis TFs contain an AD. We annotate 1,553 ADs, the vast majority of which are, to our knowledge, previously unknown. Using the dataset generated, we develop a neural network to accurately predict ADs and to identify sequence features that are necessary to recruit coactivator complexes. We uncover six distinct combinations of sequence features that result in activation activity, providing a framework to interrogate the subfunctionalization of ADs. Furthermore, we identify ADs in the ancient AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR family of TFs, revealing that AD positioning is conserved in distinct clades. Our findings provide a deep resource for understanding transcriptional activation, a framework for examining function in intrinsically disordered regions and a predictive model of ADs. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email