skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Monitoring dynamic water content, bulk density, and heat and water fluxes in the critical zone with thermo‐time domain reflectometry sensors
Abstract A thermo‐time domain reflectometry (thermo‐TDR) sensor combines a heat‐pulse sensor with a TDR waveguide to simultaneously measure coupled processes of water, heat, and solute transfer. The sensor can provide repeated in situ measurements of several soil state properties (temperature, soil water content, and ice content), thermal properties (thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity, heat capacity), and electromagnetic properties (dielectric constant and bulk electrical conductivity) with minimal soil disturbance. Combined with physical or empirical models, structural indicators, such as bulk density and air‐filled porosity, can be derived from measured soil thermal and electrical properties. Successful applications are available to determine fine‐scale heat, water, and vapor fluxes with thermo‐TDR sensors. Applications of thermo‐TDR sensors in complicated scenarios, such as heterogeneous root zones and saline environments, are also possible. Therefore, the multi‐functional uses of thermo‐TDR sensors are invaluable for in situ observations of several soil physical properties and processes in critical zone soils.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2037504
PAR ID:
10573221
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Vadose Zone Journal
Volume:
24
Issue:
1
ISSN:
1539-1663
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The goal of the New Hampshire Soil Sensor Network is to examine spatial and temporal changes in soil properties and processes as the climate changes. Data collected can also calibrate and validate models that examine how ecosystems may respond to changing climate and land use. To determine how soil processes are affected by climate change and land management, this soil sensor network measures snow depth, air temperature, soil temperature, soil volumetric water content, and soil electrical conductivity, as well as soil CO2 fluxes. This data package includes data from the air temperature, soil temperature, soil volumetric water content, and electrical conductivity sensors. Data were collected at the following sites: BRT = Bartlett Experimental Forest, Bartlett, NH; BDF = Burley-Demmerit Farm, Lee, NH; DCF = Dowst Cate Forest, Deerfield, NH; HUB = Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Woodstock, NH; SBM = Saddleback Mountain, Deerfield, NH; THF = Thompson Farm, Durham, NH; and Trout Pond Brook, Strafford, NH. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Interpreting time domain reflectometry (TDR) waveforms obtained in soils with non‐uniform water content is an open question. We design a new TDR waveform interpretation model based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) that can reveal the spatial variations of soil relative permittivity and water content along a TDR sensor. The proposed model, namely TDR‐CNN, is constructed with three modules. First, the geometrical features of the TDR waveforms are extracted with a simplified version of VGG16 network. Second, the reflection positions in a TDR waveform are traced using a 1D version of the region proposal network. Finally, the soil relative permittivity values are estimated via a CNN regression network. The three modules are developed in Python using Google TensorFlow and Keras API, and then stacked together to formulate the TDR‐CNN architecture. Each module is trained separately, and data transfer among the modules can be facilitated automatically. TDR‐CNN is evaluated using simulated TDR waveforms with varying relative permittivity but under a relatively stable soil electrical conductivity, and the accuracy and stability of the TDR‐CNN are shown. TDR measurements from a water infiltration study provide an application for TDR‐CNN and a comparison between TDR‐CNN and an inverse model. The proposed TDR‐CNN model is simple to implement, and modules in TDR‐CNN can be updated or fine‐tuned individually with new data sets. In conclusion, TDR‐CNN presents a model architecture that can be used to interpret TDR waveforms obtained in soil with a heterogeneous water content distribution. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The heat transfer and water retention in soils, governed by soil thermal conductivity (λ) and soil water retention curve (SWRC), are coupled. Soil water content (θ) significantly affects λ. Several models have been developed to describe λ(θ) relationships for unsaturated soils. Ghanbarian and Daigle presented a percolation‐based effective‐medium approximation (P‐EMA) for λ(θ) with two parameters: scaling exponent (ts) and critical water content (θc). In this study, we explored the new insights into the correlation between soil thermal conductivity and water retention using the P‐EMA and van Genuchten models. The θcwas strongly correlated to selected soil hydraulic and physical properties, such as water contents at wilting point (θpwp), inflection point (θi), and hydraulic continuity (θhc) determined from measured SWRCs for a 23‐soil calibration dataset. The established relationships were then evaluated on a seven‐soil validation dataset to estimate θc. Results confirmed their robustness with root mean square error ranging from 0.011 to 0.015 cm3cm−3, MAE ranging from 0.008 to 0.013 cm3cm−3, andR2of 0.98. Further discussion investigated the underlying mechanism for the correlation between θcwith θhcwhich dominate both heat transfer and water flow. More importantly, this study revealed the possibility to further investigate the general relationship between λ(θ) and SWRC data in the future. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Liquid‐metal embedded elastomers (LMEEs) have been demonstrated to show a variety of excellent properties, including high toughness, dielectric constant, and thermal conductivity, with applications across soft electronics and robotics. However, within this scope of use cases, operation in extreme environments – such as high‐temperature conditions – may lead to material degradation. While prior works highlight the functionality of LMEEs, there is limited insight on the thermal stability of these soft materials and how the effects of liquid metal (LM) inclusions depend on temperature. Here, the effects on thermal stability, including mechanical and electrical properties, of LMEEs are introduced. Effects are characterized for both fluoroelastomer and other elastomer‐based composites at temperature exposures up to 325 °C, where it is shown that embedding LM can offer improvements in thermo‐mechanical stability. Compared to elastomer like silicone rubber that has been previously used for LMEEs, a fluoroelastomer matrix offers a higher dielectric constant and significant improvement in thermo‐mechanical stability without sacrificing room temperature properties, such as thermal conductivity and modulus. Fluoroelastomer‐LM composites offer a promising soft, multi‐functional material for high‐temperature applications, which is demonstrated here with a printed, soft heat sink and an endoscopic sensor capable of wireless sensing of high temperatures. 
    more » « less
  5. Surface and subsurface hydrogeochemical measurements collected from three sites in the Midtre Lovenbreen (ML) glacier forefield (Svalbard), from 31 Jul 20211 - 05 Oct 2022. Measurements consist of soil volumetric water content (meter^3/meter^3), soil temperature in Celsius (deg C), soil electric conductivity in microsiemens per centimeter (uS/cm), soil dielectric permittivity (m^3/m^3) at multiple sensor depths, surface snow depth in millimeters (mm), and near-surface air temperature at 2m (deg C). Subsurface time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements are repeated for 24 sensors at sites 1 and 2, with four boreholes of six sensors each, with the following convention: sensorOne is the uppermost sensor in borehole 1, sensorSix is the lowermost sensor in borehole 1, sensorSeven is the uppermost sensor in borehole 2, sensorTwelve is the lowermost sensor in borehole 2. Site 3 has only 1 borehole with six sensors.Installation depths for the sensors can be found in the borehole notes file. Snow depth sensor measurements contain error from damaged sensors and are unreliable. 
    more » « less