In Lombardi drawings of graphs, edges are represented as circular arcs and the edges incident on vertices have perfect angular resolution. It is known that not every planar graph has a planar Lombardi drawing. We give an example of a planar 3-tree that has no planar Lombardi drawing and we show that all outerpaths do have a planar Lombardi drawing. Further, we show that there are graphs that do not even have any Lombardi drawing at all. With this in mind, we generalize the notion of Lombardi drawings to that of (smooth) k-Lombardi drawings, in which each edge may be drawn as a (differentiable) sequence of k circular arcs; we show that every graph has a smooth 2-Lombardi drawing and every planar graph has a smooth planar 3-Lombardi drawing. We further investigate related topics connecting planarity and Lombardi drawings.
more »
« less
On the Biplanarity of Blowups
The 2-blowup of a graph is obtained by replacing each vertex with two non-adjacent copies; a graph is biplanar if it is the union of two planar graphs. We disprove a conjecture of Gethner that 2-blowups of planar graphs are biplanar: iterated Kleetopes are counterexamples. Additionally, we construct biplanar drawings of 2-blowups of planar graphs whose duals have two-path induced path partitions, and drawings with split thickness two of 2-blowups of 3-chromatic planar graphs, and of graphs that can be decomposed into a Hamiltonian path and a dual Hamiltonian path.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2212129
- PAR ID:
- 10576458
- Publisher / Repository:
- Brown
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 1526-1719
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 83 to 99
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The spread of a graph $$G$$ is the difference between the largest and smallest eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix of $$G$$. Gotshall, O'Brien and Tait conjectured that for sufficiently large $$n$$, the $$n$$-vertex outerplanar graph with maximum spread is the graph obtained by joining a vertex to a path on $n-1$ vertices. In this paper, we disprove this conjecture by showing that the extremal graph is the graph obtained by joining a vertex to a path on $$\lceil(2n-1)/3\rceil$$ vertices and $$\lfloor(n-2)/3\rfloor$$ isolated vertices. For planar graphs, we show that the extremal $$n$$-vertex planar graph attaining the maximum spread is the graph obtained by joining two nonadjacent vertices to a path on $$\lceil(2n-2)/3\rceil$$ vertices and $$\lfloor(n-4)/3\rfloor$$ isolated vertices.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)We present the first algorithm to morph graphs on the torus. Given two isotopic essentially 3-connected embeddings of the same graph on the Euclidean flat torus, where the edges in both drawings are geodesics, our algorithm computes a continuous deformation from one drawing to the other, such that all edges are geodesics at all times. Previously even the existence of such a morph was not known. Our algorithm runs in O(n1+ω/2) time, where ω is the matrix multiplication exponent, and the computed morph consists of O(n) parallel linear morphing steps. Existing techniques for morphing planar straight-line graphs do not immediately generalize to graphs on the torus; in particular, Cairns' original 1944 proof and its more recent improvements rely on the fact that every planar graph contains a vertex of degree at most 5. Our proof relies on a subtle geometric analysis of 6-regular triangulations of the torus. We also make heavy use of a natural extension of Tutte's spring embedding theorem to torus graphs.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Every finite graph admits a simple (topological) drawing, that is, a drawing where every pair of edges intersects in at most one point. However, in combination with other restrictions simple drawings do not universally exist. For instance, k-planar graphs are those graphs that can be drawn so that every edge has at most k crossings (i.e., they admit a k-plane drawing). It is known that for k≤3 , every k-planar graph admits a k-plane simple drawing. But for k≥4 , there exist k-planar graphs that do not admit a k-plane simple drawing. Answering a question by Schaefer, we show that there exists a function Open image in new window such that every k-planar graph admits an f(k)-plane simple drawing, for all Open image in new window. Note that the function f depends on k only and is independent of the size of the graph. Furthermore, we develop an algorithm to show that every 4-planar graph admits an 8-plane simple drawing.more » « less
-
Abstract We present progress on three old conjectures about longest paths and cycles in graphs. The first pair of conjectures, due to Lovász from 1969 and Thomassen from 1978, respectively, states that all connected vertex‐transitive graphs contain a Hamiltonian path, and that all sufficiently large such graphs even contain a Hamiltonian cycle. The third conjecture, due to Smith from 1984, states that for in every ‐connected graph any two longest cycles intersect in at least vertices. In this paper, we prove a new lemma about the intersection of longest cycles in a graph, which can be used to improve the best known bounds toward all the aforementioned conjectures: First, we show that every connected vertex‐transitive graph on vertices contains a cycle (and hence path) of length at least , improving on from DeVos [arXiv:2302:04255, 2023]. Second, we show that in every ‐connected graph with , any two longest cycles meet in at least vertices, improving on from Chen, Faudree, and Gould [J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B,72(1998) no. 1, 143–149]. Our proof combines combinatorial arguments, computer search, and linear programming.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

