Armsworth, Paul R, Dilkina, Bistra, Fargione, Joe, Fisher, Maria, Fovargue, Rachel, Harris, Jamal, Jackson, Heather B, Le_Bouille, Diane, and Nolte, Christoph. Optimal conservation outcomes consider donor geography and their willingness to support more distant projects. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10577280. Biological Conservation 297.C Web. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110734.

Armsworth, Paul R, Dilkina, Bistra, Fargione, Joe, Fisher, Maria, Fovargue, Rachel, Harris, Jamal, Jackson, Heather B, Le_Bouille, Diane, & Nolte, Christoph. Optimal conservation outcomes consider donor geography and their willingness to support more distant projects. Biological Conservation, 297 (C). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10577280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110734

Armsworth, Paul R, Dilkina, Bistra, Fargione, Joe, Fisher, Maria, Fovargue, Rachel, Harris, Jamal, Jackson, Heather B, Le_Bouille, Diane, and Nolte, Christoph. "Optimal conservation outcomes consider donor geography and their willingness to support more distant projects". Biological Conservation 297 (C). Country unknown/Code not available: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110734. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10577280.

@article{osti_10577280,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available}, title = {Optimal conservation outcomes consider donor geography and their willingness to support more distant projects}, url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10577280}, DOI = {10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110734}, abstractNote = {}, journal = {Biological Conservation}, volume = {297}, number = {C}, publisher = {Elsevier}, author = {Armsworth, Paul R and Dilkina, Bistra and Fargione, Joe and Fisher, Maria and Fovargue, Rachel and Harris, Jamal and Jackson, Heather B and Le_Bouille, Diane and Nolte, Christoph}, }