An official website of the United States government
With the urgent call for supporting science teachers to promote equity and justice through their daily work of teaching, there is a growing need for better understanding how science teachers come to engage in transformative teaching and learning that is equitably consequential. In this participatory design research project (Bang & Vossoughi, 2016), we created a professional learning context in which high school chemistry teachers engaged in a pedagogical imagining (Gutiérrez & Calabese Barton, 2015) by leveraging their teaching experiences, knowledge about students and communities, values, and concerns to create powerful learning contexts for Latinx and multilingual students from immigrant, low-income families. Drawing upon the perspective of learning as making and sharing of the world interwoven with making and sharing of selves (Warren et al, 2020), we analyzed teachers’ participations and discourses to examine teachers’ making and sharing that were equitably consequential. The findings illustrated three critical moments of teachers’ making and sharing where: (a) the teachers collectively developed shared pedagogical goals toward transformative learning while formulating agency, (b) the teachers and the researchers came to design a creative stoichiometry unit where students use chemistry to make their community better, and (c) the teachers came to be committed to being ‘intentional’ in their relational work to create a welcoming and safe learning environment using concrete pedagogical strategies. The analyses point out three design features of the professional learning context that were associated with the teachers’ consequential makings: (a) the use of a conceptual tool (i.e., ‘design principles’), (b) the power of “what if” discourses, and (c) creating a space for collective learning. Recommendations for designing professional learning context toward transformative teaching and learning are discussed.
more »
« less
Teaching and Learning Through Pedagogical Environment Design
People often rely on knowledgeable teachers to help them learn. Sometimes, this teaching is direct: teachers provide in- structions, examples, demonstrations, or feedback. But other times, teaching is more subtle: teachers construct the physi- cal environment in which a learner explores. In the present research, we investigate this more subtle form of teaching in an artificial grid-based learning environment. How do people construct the physical environment to teach, and how does the (pedagogical) design of the physical environment affect peo- ple’s learning? Study 1 shows that people pursue multiple ap- proaches to pedagogical environment design. Study 2 shows that learners make systematic, often accurate inferences from pedagogically designed environments, even in the absence of exploration. Together, these studies add to our understanding of the myriad ways in which experts communicate their knowl- edge to novices—a ca
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2021060
- PAR ID:
- 10577762
- Publisher / Repository:
- Cognitive Science Society
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- pedagogy learning teaching environment design guided play
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Implementing a technology-mediated learning environment is a challenge for teachers. They have to not only use the learning materials effectively (pedagogical content knowledge) but also integrate the technology that mediates the learning. It is important that prior to the implementation of technology-mediated learning content in the classroom, teachers feel confident on how to use the technology. Therefore, an effective professional development should be provided to the teachers. This paper includes details of the design and conduct of a professional development workshop on a technology-mediated learning environment for middle school math and science teachers from rural and economically depressed school districts. The teaching of active-learning math and science modules supported by flight simulation software was modelled during a one week summer professional development. The participating teachers’ attitudes were measured using the Math/Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instruments. The teachers were also administered a post-workshop survey to solicit their perceptions of the effectiveness of the professional development. Analyses of the data indicated high self-efficacy in using the pedagogical approach and confidence in the effectiveness of the pedagogical approach. This paper will share the methodology of developing the pedagogical approach and some results based on the data analysis.more » « less
-
Abstract BackgroundElementary educators are increasingly asked to teach engineering design, motivating study of how they learn to teach this discipline. In particular, there is a need to examine how teachers reason about pedagogical situations and dilemmas in engineering—how they draw on their disciplinary understandings, attention to students' thinking, and pedagogical practices to support students' learning. Purpose/HypothesisThe purpose of our qualitative study was to examine elementary teachers' pedagogical reasoning in an online graduate program. We asked: What stances do teachers take toward learning and teaching engineering design? How do these stances shift over the course of the program? Design/MethodWe identified two teachers, Alma and Margaret, who exhibited productive shifts in their pedagogical reasoning during the program. Drawing on interviews and videos of their teaching, we developed case studies characterizing their stances toward teaching and learning engineering. ResultsAlma shifted in her reasoning about teaching the design process, from treating it as linear, discrete steps to recognizing the dynamic, overlapping nature of design practices. Similarly, Margaret shifted in how she reasoned about failure and iteration, recognizing the need to help students analyze unexpected design performances to learn from and iterate on their designs. For both teachers, these shifts were dynamic and nonlinear, reflecting both context‐sensitivity and growing stability in their reasoning. ConclusionsEngineering teacher educators should provide opportunities for teachers to reason about the specific pedagogical dilemmas in engineering and consider how teachers integrate disciplinary understandings with attention to students' reasoning and actions and pedagogical practices.more » « less
-
Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) is a complex, multifaceted construct that is widely seen as foundational to the act of teaching. In this synthesis, we investigated how the National Science Foundation’s (NSF’s) recent research investments have advanced understanding and supported the development of teachers’ PCK in PK–12 mathematics and science education. In the 5 years from 2011 to 2015, NSF’s Discovery Research PK–12 program (DRK-12) funded or cofunded 27 projects relating to PCK, totaling $62 million awarded. These 27 DRK-12 projects primarily applied correlational/observational and longitudinal methods (rather than quasi-experimental or experimental methods), often targeting teaching in the middle school grades. Our synthesis of empirical findings focused on how these projects studied PCK, including its measurement, development, and relationship to teaching and student learning. Link to PDF: https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/Teachers-Pedagogical-Content-Knowledge-in-Math-and-Science-April-2022.pdfmore » « less
-
NA (Ed.)This article introduces the concept of Youth Pedagogical Development (YPD), defined as an ongoing process of youth learning to teach other youth as they engage with academic knowledge and pedagogical strategies. To conceptualize and provide empirical support for YPD, we look at three case studies with community-based organizations that teach young people how to teach and mentor in STEM. We examine how youth’s teaching, mentoring, and learning from other near-peer youth transforms how youth identify as STEM teachers, learners, and doers. We propose that this development of youth teaching other youth creates more humanizing learning spaces where Black and Brown youth feel supported, cared for, and agentic.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
