The University of Indianapolis Teach (STEM)3 (UIndy TS3) program is a clinical residency teacher preparation program in which candidates earn a Master of Arts in Teaching degree with licensure in Chemistry, Biology, or Math. UIndy TS3 consists of multiple layers of support, including a clinical residency with clinical mentor teachers and clinical faculty who also serve as university supervisors, integrated and scaffolded university coursework, which includes clinical seminars and classroom observations, and two years of in-service mentoring. Evaluation and retention results indicate that candidates are well-supported in their high-need classrooms by these program components, and our 3-year retention rate of 93% over eight cohorts is higher than the national average. Moreover, the clinical mentor teacher (CMT) is enriched by the candidate’s presence in the classroom, as the candidate imports new teaching methodologies (such as project-based learning) and technologies to the classroom that in turn inform the practice of the CMT. School administrators are also positively impacted by interacting with the candidates, both by keeping apprised of the challenges that new teachers face and by learning new ways to engage students. The efficacy of UIndy TS3 is proven by our 100% placement rate, long-term retention of program graduates, and their recognition as teacher leaders.
more »
« less
Empowering Education: A closer look at grants driving change in the Mercy University School of Education
Many colleges and universities are increasingly relying on grant funding to supplement their efforts to educate and support their growing diverse student populations. Mercy University has a long history of preparing excellent teachers and educational professionals. This article explores how the School of Education at Mercy University has secured and employed federal, state, and local grants to not only strengthen their endeavors to prepare future educators, but to drive innovative change through unique programming and mentoring support.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10578126
- Publisher / Repository:
- Creative Commons
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Global education review
- ISSN:
- 2325-663X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Meeting the needs of dual-career academic couples has become an important part of university efforts to foster family-friendly workplaces. Many universities have developed formal or informal approaches to addressing dual-career issues, but variation across institutions has made it difficult to detect wider patterns or probe their implications. In this paper, we analyze the dual-career policies and materials (848 documents total) of all R1 institutions in the United States. As with studies from roughly two decades ago, we find deficiencies in institutional support and transparency. However, given reduced state revenues for institutions of higher education and a rise in precarious employment arrangements over the same time period, conditions for academic couples are arguably worse today. In order for universities to address these concerns and contribute meaningfully to broader forms of inclusion, we argue that there is a need for sustained funding commitments and infrastructural support for dual-career programs.more » « less
-
The Koa ecosystem is a comprehensive computational ecosystem built on open source software and developed by the University of Hawai‘i to enhance data-intensive research across its campuses. The Koa ecosystem addresses critical needs for computational resources, high-performance storage, and sustainable infrastructure to support multiple scientific disciplines. Over two years, the Koa ecosystem has significantly boosted research output, as evidenced by numerous publications acknowledging it and the research community’s continued investment in expanding the resource.more » « less
-
Calls from regional commissions and research in rural education have emphasized the importance of collaboration to build economic resilience, support communities, and provide students with access to resources for educational opportunities. This study took place in the context of a partnership in a rural, Appalachian region of Virginia focused on providing recurring hands-on activities for middle school students to explore engineering in classrooms with the support of local engineering industry professionals, university affiliates, and teachers. The purpose of this study is to describe how university affiliates explained collaboration using a process framework of collaboration defined around governance, administration, organizational autonomy, mutuality, and norms of trust and reciprocity. Utilizing a single case study methodology, five semi-structured interviews with university affiliates after the second year of partnership were analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach primarily informed by deductive methods and guided by the theoretical framework. Findings from the analysis suggest that university affiliates understood that there are unequal benefits for participating in the partnership, meaning that some partners got more out of the partnership than they might have been able to contribute. Additionally, participants suggested that each partners’ roles and responsibilities were unclear at times, which could have been clarified and strengthened through building relationships and trust among partners. Finally, participants suggested that tensions were present between what teachers were asked to do in the partnership and what might have been required of them by their schools given school expectations around preparation and testing around standards of learning. This research leads to recommendations around building future partnerships and sustainability of partnerships keeping in mind the importance of relationship building and being responsive to the needs of each partner. Additionally, future research could examine specific partnership roles from lenses related to sensemaking and boundary spanning.more » « less
-
3D printing (3DP) has been becoming more and more popular throughout the education system from Kindergarten to University. High school is a critical period for students to decide their imminent university major selection which in turn will impact their future career choices. High school students are usually intrigued by hands-on tool such as 3DP which is also an important contributor to other courses such as robotics. The recent years have seen more investment and availability of 3DP in high schools, especially Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs. However, mere availability of 3DP is not enough for teachers to fully utilize its potential in their classrooms. While basic 3DP skills can be obtained through a few hours of training, the basic training is insufficient to ensure effective teaching Engineering Design Process (EDP) at the high school level. To address this problem, this project develops an EDP course tightly integrated with 3DP for preservice teachers (PST) who are going to enter the workforce in high schools. Engineering design process (EDP) has become an essential part for preservice teachers (PST), especially for high school STEM. 3DP brought transformative change to EDP which is an iterative process that needs virtual/physical prototyping. The new PST course on EDP will be purposefully integrated with an in-depth discussion of 3DP. The approach is to dissect a 3D printer’s hardware, explain each component’s function, introduce each component’s manufacturing methods, describe possible defects, and elucidate what works and what does not. This has at least four benefits: 1) PSTs will know what is possibly wrong when a printer or printing process fails, 2) PSTs will learn more manufacturing processes besides 3DP that can be used to support engineering design prototyping, 3) PSTs will know how to design something that can meet the manufacturing constraints, i.e., can be actually fabricated, and 4) reduce errors and frustrations caused by failed design and failed prints which happen frequently to novices in 3DP. After graduation, PSTs will bring the knowledge to their future high schools and will be more confident in teaching engineering design, reverse engineering, prototype development, manufacturing, and technology. The developed course will be implemented and assessed in a future semester.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

