More Like this

1. From transactional to transformative: evolving research practices through mutual aid collaboration

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2025.100767  

   Bollempalli, Manasa; Fatema, Nuzhat; Bass, Kevin; Adams, Anthony; Dadson, Yvonne Appiah; Gilmore, Elisabeth; Bennett-Gayle, DeeDee; Li, Amy; Ramenzoni, Victoria (November 2025, Climate Risk Management)

   While equity in climate adaptation is increasingly recognized, university-based research can inadvertently reinforce inequities. This paper examines a partnership between Homies Helping Homies, a South Philadelphia mutual aid organization, and university researchers to document climate impacts on low-income and marginalized communities. Inequities often arise when research fails to engage communities, overlooks relevant concerns, lacks trust, or misinterprets responses due to insufficient cultural understanding. Mutual aid organizations, inherently community-based, foster resilience and solidarity, addressing unmet needs while building collective trust. Anchored in Participatory Action Research (PAR) and Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), we adopt a reflexive, co-produced approach that foregrounds positionality, reciprocity, and shared decision-making. This approach transformed the researcher-community relationships, leveled hierarchies, and addressed the gaps in familiarity among researchers and other actors. By centering everyday experiences of heat, flooding, and resource scarcity, the collaboration revealed how local knowledge and trust networks shape risk perception and adaptive behavior. The case demonstrates how mutual aid organizations can serve as both community resilience infrastructure and methodological partners in producing usable, justice-oriented climate knowledge. We argue that embedding research within reciprocal, care-centered relationships enhances the legitimacy, ethics, and transformative potential of climate risk management, particularly in urban contexts marked by systemic inequity. 

   more » « less
2. Improving adaptation to wildfire smoke and extreme heat in frontline communities: evidence from a community-engaged pilot study in the San Francisco Bay Area

   https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acddf9  

   Herbert, Natalie; Beckman, Caroline; Cannedy, Cade; Cao, Jinpu; Cho, Seung-Hyun; Fischer, Stephanie; Huang, ShihMing; Kramer, Samantha J; Lopez, Ortensia; Lopez, Sergio Sanchez; et al (June 2023, Environmental Research Letters)

   Abstract Exposure to climate hazards is increasing, and the experiences of frontline communities warrant meaningful and urgent attention towards how to mitigate, manage, and adapt to hazards. We report results from a community-engaged pilot (November 2021–June 2022) ofN= 30 participants in four frontline communities of the San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA. The study region is an area where low-income, non-English-speaking residents are inequitably exposed and vulnerable to wildfire smoke, extreme heat, and other climate hazards. Building from a yearslong partnership of researchers, community organizations, and community members, we report the feasibility of a project piloting (1) instruments to monitor indoor air quality, temperature, and participant sleep health, and (2) interventions to improve indoor air quality and support protective behaviors. Data collection included experience-based survey data (via in-person administered surveys and a smartphone application) and interviews about heat and air quality, as well as data from an air monitoring protocol. Results cover the prevalence of hazard exposure and protective actions among participants. We discuss throughout methods for conducting and evaluating a community-engaged pilot, particularly by using a community ambassador program. Implications include the feasibility of community-engaged research projects, including discussion of resources required to accomplish this work. 

   more » « less
3. Clearing the air: evaluating institutions’ social media health messaging on wildfire and smoke risks in the US Pacific Northwest

   https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17907-1  

   Slavik, Catherine E; Chapman, Daniel A; Cohen, Alex Segrè; Bendefaa, Nahla; Peters, Ellen (December 2024, BMC Public Health)

   Abstract BackgroundWildfire smoke contributes substantially to the global disease burden and is a major cause of air pollution in the US states of Oregon and Washington. Climate change is expected to bring more wildfires to this region. Social media is a popular platform for health promotion and a need exists for effective communication about smoke risks and mitigation measures to educate citizens and safeguard public health. MethodsUsing a sample of 1,287 Tweets from 2022, we aimed to analyze temporal Tweeting patterns in relation to potential smoke exposure and evaluate and compare institutions’ use of social media communication best practices which include (i) encouraging adoption of smoke-protective actions; (ii) leveraging numeric, verbal, and Air Quality Index risk information; and (iii) promoting community-building. Tweets were characterized using keyword searches and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out. Results44% of Tweets in our sample were authored between January-August 2022, prior to peak wildfire smoke levels, whereas 54% of Tweets were authored during the two-month peak in smoke (September-October). Institutional accounts used Twitter (or X) to encourage the adoption of smoke-related protective actions (82% of Tweets), more than they used it to disseminate wildfire smoke risk information (25%) or promote community-building (47%). Only 10% of Tweets discussed populations vulnerable to wildfire smoke health effects, and 14% mentioned smoke mitigation measures. Tweets from Washington-based accounts used significantly more verbal and numeric risk information to discuss wildfire smoke than Oregon-based accounts (p = 0.042 andp = 0.003, respectively); however, Tweets from Oregon-based accounts on average contained a higher percentage of words associated with community-building language (p < 0.001). ConclusionsThis research provides practical recommendations for public health practitioners and researchers communicating wildfire smoke risks on social media. As exposures to wildfire smoke rise due to climate change, reducing the environmental disease burden requires health officials to leverage popular communication platforms, distribute necessary health-related messaging rapidly, and get the message right. Timely, evidence-based, and theory-driven messaging is critical for educating and empowering individuals to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from harmful exposures. Thus, proactive and sustained communications about wildfire smoke should be prioritized even during wildfire “off-seasons.” 

   more » « less
4. The role of compound climate and weather extreme events in creating socio-economic impacts in South Florida

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2023.100625  

   Ali, Javed; Wahl, Thomas; Enriquez, Alejandra R; Rashid, Md Mamunur; Morim, Joao; Gall, Melanie; Emrich, Christopher T (December 2023, Weather and Climate Extremes)

   Natural hazards such as hurricanes, floods, and wildfires cause devastating socio-economic impacts on communities. In South Florida, most of these hazards are becoming increasingly frequent and severe because of the warming climate, and changes in vulnerability and exposure, resulting in significant damage to infrastructure, homes, and businesses. To better understand the drivers of these impacts, we developed a bottom-up impact-based methodology that takes into account all relevant drivers for different types of hazards. We identify the specific drivers that co-occurred with socio-economic impacts and determine whether these extreme events were caused by single or multiple hydrometeorological drivers (i.e., compound events). We consider six types of natural hazards: hurricanes, severe storm/thunderstorms, floods, heatwaves, wildfire, and winter weather. Using historical, socio-economic loss data along with observations and reanalysis data for hydrometeorological drivers, we analyze how often these drivers contributed to the impacts of natural hazards in South Florida. We find that for each type of hazard, the relative importance of the drivers varies depending on the severity of the event. For example, wind speed is a key driver of the socio-economic impacts of hurricanes, while precipitation is a key driver of the impacts of flooding. We find that most of the high-impact events in South Florida were compound events, where multiple drivers contributed to the occurrences and impacts of the events. For example, more than 50% of the recorded flooding events were compound events and these contributed to 99% of total property damages and 98% of total crop damages associated with flooding in Miami-Dade County. Our results provide valuable insights into the drivers of natural hazard impacts in South Florida and can inform the development of more effective risk reduction strategies for improving the preparedness and resilience of the region against extreme events. Our bottom-up impact-based methodology can be applied to other regions and hazard types, allowing for more comprehensive and accurate assessments of the impacts of compound hazards. 

   more » « less
5. NSF Belmont Forum Collaborative Research: Advancing Resilience in Low-Income Housing Using Climate-Change Science and Big Data Analytics

   https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-1kpb-dv70  

   Obonyo, Esther; Mutunga, James; Mirhosseini, Homeira (January 2025, Designsafe-CI)

   Project Overview: This NSF-funded project (Award #2019754) is part of the Belmont Forum’s Disaster Risk, Reduction, and Resilience (DR3) initiative, a global effort to assess and mitigate disaster risks through transdisciplinary collaboration. The study investigates strategies to enhance the resilience of low-income communities living in flood-prone and climate-vulnerable regions, with a geographic focus on Brazil, East Africa, and the southeastern United States. The U.S. component centers on coastal and urban communities in Florida, particularly those at risk from flooding and extreme weather events. Research Objectives: Through a transdisciplinary approach, the project integrates machine learning, geospatial analytics, and socio-economic data to: - Assess community-level vulnerabilities to flooding and extreme heat, -Identify barriers to adopting disaster-resilient housing, - Co-design affordable, climate-resilient housing prototypes using sustainable, locally sourced materials. The research aims to support community-informed design strategies and policy recommendations that are adaptable across different socio-economic and geographic contexts. Dataset Description: The dataset contains responses from approximately 500 residents aged 18+ living in low-income, flood-prone neighborhoods in Florida. The survey captures detailed information on: - Housing conditions and infrastructure, - Disaster preparedness and flood risk perception, - Access to services during and after disasters, - Health and economic impacts of extreme weather events, - Community cohesion and recovery strategies. This dataset serves as a resource for researchers, urban planners, emergency response agencies, and policymakers seeking data-driven insights to inform resilient housing design, climate adaptation, and disaster recovery planning. Data Collection and Anonymity: Survey distribution and data collection were conducted in partnership with Centiment, a third-party research company that recruits demographically targeted panels for academic and applied research. For this study, Centiment distributed the survey to residents of low-income, flood-prone communities in Florida, based on geographic and socio-economic criteria specified by the research team. All personally identifiable information (PII), such as IP addresses, email addresses, and precise geolocation data, was removed prior to uploading the dataset to DesignSafe. The dataset has been reviewed to ensure participant anonymity in accordance with DesignSafe data protection policies and applicable ethical standards. 

   more » « less