An official website of the United States government
Abstract Numerous organismal traits, particularly at the cellular level, are likely to be under persistent directional selection across phylogenetic lineages. Unless all mutations affecting such traits have large enough effects to be efficiently selected in all species, gradients in mean phenotypes are expected to arise as a consequence of differences in the power of random genetic drift, which varies by approximately five orders of magnitude across the Tree of Life. Prior theoretical work examining the conditions under which such gradients can arise focused on the simple situation in which all genomic sites affecting the trait have identical and constant mutational effects. Here, we extend this theory to incorporate the more biologically realistic situation in which mutational effects on a trait differ among nucleotide sites. Pursuit of such modifications leads to the development of semi-analytic expressions for the ways in which selective interference arises via linkage effects in single-effects models, which then extend to more complex scenarios. The theory developed clarifies the conditions under which mutations of different selective effects mutually interfere with each others’ fixation and shows how variance in effects among sites can substantially modify and extend the expected scaling relationships between mean phenotypes and effective population sizes.
more »
« less
The divergence of mean phenotypes under persistent Gaussian selection
Abstract Although multigenic traits are often assumed to be under some form of stabilizing selection, numerous aspects of the population-genetic environment can cause mean phenotypes to deviate from presumed optima, often in ways that effectively transform the fitness landscape to one of directional selection. Focusing on an asexual population, we consider the ways in which such deviations scale with the relative power of selection and genetic drift, the number of linked genomic sites, the magnitude of mutation bias, and the location of optima with respect to possible genotypic space. Even in the absence of mutation bias, mutation will influence evolved mean phenotypes unless the optimum happens to coincide exactly with the mean expected under neutrality. In the case of directional mutation bias and large numbers of selected sites, effective population sizes (Ne) can be dramatically reduced by selective interference effects, leading to further mismatches between phenotypic means and optima. Situations in which the optimum is outside or near the limits of possible genotypic space (e.g. a half-Gaussian fitness function) can lead to particularly pronounced gradients of phenotypic means with respect to Ne, but such gradients can also occur when optima are well within the bounds of attainable phenotypes. These results help clarify the degree to which mean phenotypes can vary among populations experiencing identical mutation and selection pressures but differing in Ne, and yield insight into how the expected scaling relationships depend on the underlying features of the genetic system.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2119963
- PAR ID:
- 10583351
- Publisher / Repository:
- Oxford University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- GENETICS
- Volume:
- 229
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1943-2631
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Under global change, the impact of seed banks on evolutionary rescue is uncertain. They buffer plant populations from demographic and genetic stochasticity but extend generation time and can become a reservoir of maladapted alleles. We built analytical and individual-based models to predict the effect of seed banks on the persistence of small annual plant populations facing an abrupt or sustained directional change in uni- or multivariate trait optima. Demogenetic dynamics predict that under most scenarios seed banks increase the lag yet enhance persistence to 200–250 years by absorbing demographic losses. Simulations indicate that the seed bank has a minimal impact on the genetic skew, although we suggest that this result could depend on the fitness component under selection. Our multivariate model reveals that by enlarging and reshaping the G matrix, seed banks can diminish the impact of mutational correlation and even accelerate adaptation under antagonistic pleiotropy relative to populations without a bank. We illustrate how the magnitude of optimum fluctuations, type and degree of optimum change, selection strength, and vital rates are weights that tip the scales determining persistence. Finally, our work highlights that migration from the past is not maladaptative when optimum fluctuations are large enough to create stepping stones to the new optimum.more » « less
-
Charlesworth, Deborah; Connallon, Tim (Ed.)Abstract Sexual antagonism occurs when males and females differ in their phenotypic fitness optima but are constrained in their evolution to these optima because of their shared genome. The sex chromosomes, which have distinct evolutionary “interests” relative to the autosomes, are theorized to play an important role in sexually antagonistic conflict. However, the evolutionary responses of sex chromosomes and autosomes have usually been considered independently, that is, via contrasting the response of a gene located on either an X chromosome or an autosome. Here, we study the coevolutionary response of the X chromosome and autosomes to sexually antagonistic selection acting on a polygenic phenotype. We model a phenotype initially under stabilizing selection around a single optimum, followed by a sudden divergence of the male and female optima. We find that, in the absence of dosage compensation, the X chromosome promotes evolution toward the female optimum, inducing coevolutionary male-biased responses on the autosomes. Dosage compensation obscures the female-biased interests of the X, causing it to contribute equally to male and female phenotypic change. We further demonstrate that fluctuations in an adaptive landscape can generate prolonged intragenomic conflict and accentuate the differential responses of the X and autosomes to this conflict.more » « less
-
Inbreeding depression is a key factor regulating the evolution of self-fertilization in plants. Despite predictions that inbreeding depression should evolve with selfing rates as deleterious alleles are increasingly exposed and removed by selection, evidence of purging the genetic load in wild populations is equivocal at best. This discordance could be explained, in part, if the load underlying inbreeding depression is subject to soft selection, i.e., the fitness of selfed individuals depends on the frequency and density of selfed vs. outcrossed individuals in the population. Somewhat counterintuitively, this means that populations with contrasting mutation load can have similar fitness. Soft selection against selfed individuals may be expected when there is inbreeding depression for competitive ability in density-regulated populations. We tested population-level predictions of inbreeding depression in competitive ability by creating a density series of potted plants consisting of either purely outcrossed, purely selfed, or mixed (50% outcrossed, 50% selfed) seed of the mixed-mating biennialSabatia angularis(Gentianaceae) representing ecological neighborhoods. Focusing on the growth and survival of juveniles, we show that mean plant size is independent of neighborhood composition when resources are limiting, but greatest in outcrossed neighborhoods at low densities. Across a range of densities, this manifests as stronger density-dependence in outcrossed populations compared to selfed or mixed ones. We also found significantly greater size inequalities among individuals in mixed neighborhoods, even at high densities where mean juvenile size converged, a key signature of asymmetric competition between outcrossed and selfed individuals. Our work illustrates how soft selection could shelter the genetic load underlying inbreeding depression and its demographic consequences.more » « less
-
Abstract Two long-standing challenges in theoretical population genetics and evolution are predicting the distribution of phenotype diversity generated by mutation and available for selection, and determining the interaction of mutation, selection and drift to characterize evolutionary equilibria and dynamics. More fundamental for enabling such predictions is the current inability to causally link genotype to phenotype. There are three major mechanistic mappings required for such a linking – genetic sequence to kinetic parameters of the molecular processes, kinetic parameters to biochemical system phenotypes, and biochemical phenotypes to organismal phenotypes. This article introduces a theoretical framework, the Phenotype Design Space (PDS) framework, for addressing these challenges by focusing on the mapping of kinetic parameters to biochemical system phenotypes. It provides a quantitative theory whose key features include (1) a mathematically rigorous definition of phenotype based on biochemical kinetics, (2) enumeration of the full phenotypic repertoire, and (3) functional characterization of each phenotype independent of its context-dependent selection or fitness contributions. This framework is built on Design Space methods that relate system phenotypes to genetically determined parameters and environmentally determined variables. It also has the potential to automate prediction of phenotype-specific mutation rate constants and equilibrium distributions of phenotype diversity in microbial populations undergoing steady-state exponential growth, which provides an ideal reference to which more realistic cases can be compared. Although the framework is quite general and flexible, the details will undoubtedly differ for different functions, organisms and contexts. Here a hypothetical case study involving a small molecular system, a primordial circadian clock, is used to introduce this framework and to illustrate its use in a particular case. The framework is built on fundamental biochemical kinetics. Thus, the foundation is based on linear algebra and reasonable physical assumptions, which provide numerous opportunities for experimental testing and further elaboration to deal with complex multicellular organisms that are currently beyond its scope. The discussion provides a comparison of results from the PDS framework with those from other approaches in theoretical population genetics.more » « less
