An official website of the United States government
Social robots are becoming increasingly influential in shaping the behavior of humans with whom they interact. Here, we examine how the actions of a social robot can influence human-to-human communication, and not just robot–human communication, using groups of three humans and one robot playing 30 rounds of a collaborative game ( n = 51 groups). We find that people in groups with a robot making vulnerable statements converse substantially more with each other, distribute their conversation somewhat more equally, and perceive their groups more positively compared to control groups with a robot that either makes neutral statements or no statements at the end of each round. Shifts in robot speech have the power not only to affect how people interact with robots, but also how people interact with each other, offering the prospect for modifying social interactions via the introduction of artificial agents into hybrid systems of humans and machines.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on March 4, 2026
Templates and Graph Neural Networks for Social Robots Interacting in Small Groups of Varying Sizes
Social robots need to be able to interact effectively with small groups. While there is a significant interest in human-robot interaction in groups, little focus has been placed on developing autonomous social robot decision-making methods that operate smoothly with small groups of any size (e.g. 2, 3, or 4 interactants). In this work, we propose a Template- and Graph-based Modeling approach for robots interacting in small groups (TGM), enabling them to interact with groups in a way that is group-size agnostic. Critically, we separate the decision about the target of their communication, or ''whom to address?'' from the decision of ''what to communicate?'', which allows us to use template-based actions. We further use Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to efficiently decide on ''whom'' and ''what''. We evaluated TGM using imitation learning and compared the structured reasoning achieved through GNNs to unstructured approaches for this two-part decision-making problem. On two different datasets, we show that TGM outperforms the baselines encouraging future work to invest in collecting larger datasets.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2143109
- PAR ID:
- 10583556
- Publisher / Repository:
- IEEE/ACM
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- HRI '25: Proceedings of the 2025 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In this work, we analyze video data and interviews from a public deployment of two trash barrel robots in a large public space to better understand the sensemaking activities people perform when they encounter robots in public spaces. Based on an analysis of 274 human–robot interactions and interviews withN =65 individuals or groups, we discovered that people were responding not only to the robots or their behavior, but also to the general idea of deploying robots as trashcans, and the larger social implications of that idea. They wanted to understand details about the deployment because having that knowledge would change how they interact with the robot. Based on our data and analysis, we have provided implications for design that may be topics for future human–robot design researchers who are exploring robots for public space deployment. Furthermore, our work offers a practical example of analyzing field data to make sense of robots in public spaces.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The robotics community continually strives to create robots that are deployable in real-world environments. Often, robots are expected to interact with human groups. To achieve this goal, we introduce a new method, the Robot-Centric Group Estimation Model (RoboGEM), which enables robots to detect groups of people. Much of the work reported in the literature focuses on dyadic interactions, leaving a gap in our understanding of how to build robots that can effectively team with larger groups of people. Moreover, many current methods rely on exocentric vision, where cameras and sensors are placed externally in the environment, rather than onboard the robot. Consequently, these methods are impractical for robots in unstructured, human-centric environments, which are novel and unpredictable. Furthermore, the majority of work on group perception is supervised, which can inhibit performance in real-world settings. RoboGEM addresses these gaps by being able to predict social groups solely from an egocentric perspective using color and depth (RGB-D) data. To achieve group predictions, RoboGEM leverages joint motion and proximity estimations. We evaluated RoboGEM against a challenging, egocentric, real-world dataset where both pedestrians and the robot are in motion simultaneously, and show RoboGEM outperformed two state-of-the-art supervised methods in detection accuracy by up to 30%, with a lower miss rate. Our work will be helpful to the robotics community, and serve as a milestone to building unsupervised systems that will enable robots to work with human groups in real-world environments.more » « less
-
Ethical decision-making is difficult, certainly for robots let alone humans. If a robot's ethical decision-making process is going to be designed based on some approximation of how humans operate, then the assumption is that a good model of how humans make an ethical choice is readily available. Yet no single ethical framework seems sufficient to capture the diversity of human ethical decision making. Our work seeks to develop the computational underpinnings that will allow a robot to use multiple ethical frameworks that guide it towards doing the right thing. As a step towards this goal, we have collected data investigating how regular adults and ethics experts approach ethical decisions related to the use in a healthcare and game playing scenario. The decisions made by the former group is intended to represent an approximation of a folk morality approach to these dilemmas. On the other hand, experts were asked to judge what decision would result if a person was using one of several different types of ethical frameworks. The resulting data may reveal which features of the pill sorting and game playing scenarios contribute to similarities and differences between expert and non-expert responses. This type of approach to programming a robot may one day be able to rely on specific features of an interaction to determine which ethical framework to use in the robot's decision making.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Explainability has emerged as a critical AI research objective, but the breadth of proposed methods and application domains suggest that criteria for explanation vary greatly. In particular, what counts as a good explanation, and what kinds of explanation are computationally feasible, has become trickier in light of oqaque “black box” systems such as deep neural networks. Explanation in such cases has drifted from what many philosophers stipulated as having to involve deductive and causal principles to mere “interpretation,” which approximates what happened in the target system to varying degrees. However, such post hoc constructed rationalizations are highly problematic for social robots that operate interactively in spaces shared with humans. For in such social contexts, explanations of behavior, and, in particular, justifications for violations of expected behavior, should make reference to socially accepted principles and norms. In this article, we show how a social robot’s actions can face explanatory demands for how it came to act on its decision, what goals, tasks, or purposes its design had those actions pursue and what norms or social constraints the system recognizes in the course of its action. As a result, we argue that explanations for social robots will need to be accurate representations of the system’s operation along causal, purposive, and justificatory lines. These explanations will need to generate appropriate references to principles and norms—explanations based on mere “interpretability” will ultimately fail to connect the robot’s behaviors to its appropriate determinants. We then lay out the foundations for a cognitive robotic architecture for HRI, together with particular component algorithms, for generating explanations and engaging in justificatory dialogues with human interactants. Such explanations track the robot’s actual decision-making and behavior, which themselves are determined by normative principles the robot can describe and use for justifications.more » « less
