Abstract We study the problem of synthesizinglockdown policies—schedules of maximum capacities for different types of activity sites—to minimize the number of deceased individuals due to a pandemic within a given metropolitan statistical area (MSA) while controlling the severity of the imposed lockdown. To synthesize and evaluate lockdown policies, we develop a multiscale susceptible, infected, recovered, and deceased model that partitions a given MSA into geographic subregions, and that incorporates data on the behaviors of the populations of these subregions. This modeling approach allows for the analysis of heterogeneous lockdown policies that vary across the different types of activity sites within each subregion of the MSA. We formulate the synthesis of optimal lockdown policies as a nonconvex optimization problem and we develop an iterative algorithm that addresses this nonconvexity through sequential convex programming. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of the developed approach by applying it to six of the largest MSAs in the United States. The developed heterogeneous lockdown policies not only reduce the number of deceased individuals by up to 45 percent over a 100 day period in comparison with three baseline lockdown policies that are less heterogeneous, but they also impose lockdowns that are less severe.
more »
« less
Optimal lockdowns under constraints
Abstract We present a systematic examination of the impact of frictions on optimal pandemic response, bridging the significant gap between policy recommendations and implementation. We focus in particular on constraints in testing delivery and in lockdown efficacy in the context of a canonical pandemic model. The latter is modified for a more faithful representation of lockdowns. The paper sheds light on nuanced, and sometimes counter‐intuitive, relationships. It rationalizes key but divergent findings in the literature on the extent of substitution and complementarity between lockdowns and testing. It also demonstrates remarkable robustness in lockdown policy to changes in its efficiency.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1937229
- PAR ID:
- 10583604
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Economic Inquiry
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 0095-2583
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 523 to 544
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the need to quickly respond, via public policy, to the onset of an infectious disease breakout. Deciding the type and level of interventions a population must consider to mitigate risk and keep the disease under control could mean saving thousands of lives. Many models were quickly introduced highlighting lockdowns, testing, contact tracing, travel policies, later on vaccination, and other intervention strategies along with costs of implementation. Here, we provided a framework for capturing population heterogeneity whose consideration may be crucial when developing a mitigation strategy based on non-pharmaceutical interventions. Precisely, we used age-stratified data to segment our population into groups with unique interactions that policy can affect such as school children or the oldest of the population, and formulated a corresponding optimal control problem considering the economic cost of lockdowns and deaths. We applied our model and numerical methods to census data for the state of New Jersey and determined the most important factors contributing to the cost and the optimal strategies to contained the pandemic impact.more » « less
-
Shaw, Shih-Lung; Sui, Daniel (Ed.)When the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the pandemic of COVID-19, people around the globe scattered to stores for groceries, supplies, and other miscellaneous items in preparation for quarantine. The dynamics of retail visits changed dramatically due to the pandemic outbreak. The study intends to analyze how the store visit patterns have changed due to the lockdown policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using mobile phone location data, we build a time-aware Huff model to estimate and compare the visiting probability of different brands of stores over different time periods. We are able to identify certain retail and grocery stores that have more or fewer visits due to the pandemic outbreak, and we detect whether there are any trends in visiting certain retail establishments (e.g., department stores, grocery stores, fast-food restaurants, and cafes) and how the visiting patterns have adjusted with lockdowns. We also make comparisons among brands across three highly populated U.S. cities to identify potential regional variability. It has been found that people in large metropolitan areas with a well-developed transit system tend to show less sensitivity to long-distance visits. In addition, Target, which is a department store, is found to be more negatively affected by longer-distance trips than other grocery stores after the lockdown. The findings can be further applied to support policymaking related to public health, urban planning, transportation, and business in post-pandemic cities.more » « less
-
COVID-19 lockdowns in early 2020 reduced human mobility, providing an opportunity to disentangle its effects on animals from those of landscape modifications. Using GPS data, we compared movements and road avoidance of 2300 terrestrial mammals (43 species) during the lockdowns to the same period in 2019. Individual responses were variable with no change in average movements or road avoidance behavior, likely due to variable lockdown conditions. However, under strict lockdowns 10-day 95th percentile displacements increased by 73%, suggesting increased landscape permeability. Animals’ 1-hour 95th percentile displacements declined by 12% and animals were 36% closer to roads in areas of high human footprint, indicating reduced avoidance during lockdowns. Overall, lockdowns rapidly altered some spatial behaviors, highlighting variable but substantial impacts of human mobility on wildlife worldwide.more » « less
-
Abstract The effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during a pandemic is challenging to assess due to the multifaceted interactions between interventions and population dynamics. Significant difficulty arises from the overlapping effects of various NPIs applied to different subgroups within a population. To address this, we propose a new mathematical model that incorporates various intervention strategies, including total and partial lockdowns, school closures, and reduced interactions among specific subgroups, such as the elderly. Our model extends previous work by explicitly accounting for the quadratic nature of control costs and the interplay between overlapping controls targeting the same population segments. Using optimal control theory, we identify intervention policies that effectively mitigate disease transmission while balancing economic and societal costs. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we apply the model to real-world data from the COVID-19 pandemic in the State of New Jersey. Our results provide insights into the trade-offs and synergies of different NPIs and the importance of accurately capturing the relationship between a policy and the population affected.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

