An official website of the United States government
Abstract AimsGLP‐1 and GIP‐GLP‐1 agonists have emerged as potent weight‐loss medications. These incretin mimetics often have low patient adherence, and as with any medication, clinically meaningful efficacy requires adequate adherence. But what constitutes “adequate” adherence for incretin mimetics? The purpose of this paper is to address this question. Materials and MethodsWe use mathematical modelling and stochastic simulation to investigate the weight loss efficacy of incretin mimetics under imperfect adherence. We use validated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of semaglutide and tirzepatide and assume that simulated patients randomly miss doses. ResultsWe find that semaglutide and tirzepatide forgive nonadherence, meaning that strong weight loss efficacy persists despite missed doses. For example, taking 80% of the prescribed doses yields around 90% of the weight loss achieved under perfect adherence. Taking only 50% of the prescribed doses yields nearly 70% of the weight loss of perfect adherence. Furthermore, such nonadherence causes only small fluctuations in body weight, assuming that patients do not typically miss more than several consecutive doses. ConclusionIncretin mimetics are powerful tools for combating obesity, perhaps even if patients can consistently take only half of their prescribed doses. The common assumption that significant weight loss requires at least 80% adherence needs revision.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on February 1, 2026
Development and Implementation of a Personal Virtual Assistant for Patient Engagement and Communication in Postsurgical Cancer Care: Feasibility Cohort Study
Abstract BackgroundCancer-care complexity heightens communication challenges between health care providers and patients, impacting their treatment adherence. This is especially evident upon hospital discharge in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Digital health tools offer potential solutions to address communication challenges seen in current discharge protocols. We aim to explore the usability and acceptability of an interactive health platform among discharged patients who underwent oncology-related procedures. MethodsA 4-week exploratory cohort study was conducted. Following hospital discharge, a tablet equipped with an integrated Personal Virtual Assistant (PVA) system was provided to patients who underwent oncology-related procedures. The PVA encompasses automated features that provide personalized care plans, developed through collaboration among clinicians, researchers, and engineers from various disciplines. These plans include guidance on daily specific assignments that were divided into 4 categories: medication intake, exercise,symptom surveys, and postprocedural specific tasks. The aim was to explore the acceptability of the PVA by quantification of dropout rate and assessing adherence to each care plan category throughout the study duration. The secondary aim assessed acceptability of the PVA through a technology acceptance model (TAM) questionnaire that examined ease of use, usefulness, attitude toward use, and privacy concerns. ResultsIn total, 17 patients were enrolled. However, 1 (5.8%) patient dropped out from the study after 3 days due to health deterioration, leaving 16/17 (94.2%) completing the study (mean age 54.5, SD 12.7, years; n=9, 52% Caucasian; n=14, 82% with a gynecological disease; n=3, 18% with a hepatobiliary disease). At the study end point, adherence to care plan categories were 78% (SD 25%) for medications, 81% (SD 24%) for exercises, 61% (SD 30%) for surveys, and 58% (SD 44%) for specific tasks such as following step-by step wound care instructions, managing drains, administering injectable medications independently, and performing pelvic baths as instructed. There was an 80% patient endorsement (strongly agree or agree) across all TAM categories. ConclusionThis study suggests the potential acceptability of the PVA among patients discharged after oncology-related procedures, with a dropout rate of less than 6% and fair-to-good adherence to tasks such as medication intake and exercise. However, these findings are preliminary due to the small sample size and highlight the need for further research with larger cohorts to validate and refine the system.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2516857
- PAR ID:
- 10584457
- Publisher / Repository:
- JMIR
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- JMIR Cancer
- Volume:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 2369-1999
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e64145 to e64145
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a medically supervised program designed to improve heart health after a cardiac event. Despite its demonstrated clinical benefits, CR participation among eligible patients remains poor due to low referral rates and individual barriers to care. To evaluate CR participation by patients who receive care from hospital-integrated physicians compared with independent physicians, and subsequently, to examine CR and recurrent cardiac hospitalizations. This retrospective cohort study evaluated Medicare Part A and Part B claims data from calendar years 2016 to 2019. All analyses were conducted between January 1 and April 30, 2024. Patients were included if they had a qualifying event for CR between 2017 and 2018, and qualifying events were identified using diagnosis codes on inpatient claims and procedure codes on outpatient and carrier claims. Eligible patients also had to continuously enroll in fee-for-service Medicare for 12 months or more before and after the index event. Physicians’ integration status and patients’ CR participation were determined during the 12-month follow-up period. The study covariates were ascertained during the 12 months before the index event. ExposureHospital-integration status of the treating physician during follow-up. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPostindex CR participation was determined by qualifying procedure codes on outpatient and carrier claims. ResultsThe study consisted of 28 596 Medicare patients eligible for CR. Their mean (SD) age was 74.0 (9.6) years; 16 839 (58.9%) were male. A total of 9037 patients (31.6%) were treated by a hospital-integrated physician, of which 2995 (33.1%) received CR during follow-up. Logistic regression via propensity score weighting showed that having a hospital-integrated physician was associated with an 11% increase in the odds of receiving CR (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18). Additionally, CR participation was associated with a 14% decrease in the odds of recurrent cardiovascular-related hospitalizations (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91). The findings of this cohort study suggest that hospital integration has the potential to facilitate greater CR participation and improve heart care. Several factors may help explain this positive association, including enhanced care coordination and value-based payment policies. Further research is needed to assess the association of integration with other appropriate high-quality care activities.more » « less
-
ImportancePatients often travel for cancer care, yet the extent to which patients cross state lines for cancer care is not well understood. This knowledge can have implications for policies that regulate telehealth access to out-of-state clinicians. ObjectiveTo quantify the extent of cross-state delivery of cancer services to patients with cancer. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study analyzed fee-for-service Medicare claims data for beneficiaries (aged ≥66 years) with a diagnosis of breast, colon, lung, or pancreatic cancer between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. Analyses were performed between January 1 and July 30, 2024. ExposurePatient rurality. Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome of interest was receipt of cancer care across state lines. Frequencies of cancer services (surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy) were summarized by cancer type in relation to in-state vs out-of-state receipt of care based on state of residence for Medicare beneficiaries. Cross-state delivery of cancer services was also quantified by adjacent vs nonadjacent states and overall between-state flows for service utilization. ResultsThe study included 1 040 874 Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 76.5 (7.4) years. Most patients were female (68.2%) and urban residing (78.5%); one-quarter (25.9%) were aged between 70 and 74 years. In terms of race and ethnicity, 7.0% of patients identified as Black, 3.4% as Hispanic, and 85.5% as White. Overall, approximately 6.9% of cancer care was delivered across state lines, with the highest proportion (8.3%) occurring for surgical care, followed by radiation (6.7%) and chemotherapy (5.6%) services. Out of all cross-state care, 68.4% occurred in adjacent states. Frequency of cross-state cancer care increased with patient rurality. Compared with urban-residing patients, isolated rural-residing patients were 2.5 times more likely to cross state lines for surgical procedures (18.5% vs 7.5%), 3 times more likely to cross state lines for radiation therapy services (16.9% vs 5.7%), and almost 4 times more likely to cross state lines for chemotherapy services (16.3% vs 4.2%). Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study of Medicare claims data, a notable proportion of cancer services occurred across state lines, particularly for rural-residing patients. These results highlight the need for cross-state telehealth policies that recognize the prevalence of care delivery from geographically distant specialized oncology services.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Nearly half of people prescribed medication to treat chronic or short-term conditions do not take their medicine as prescribed. This leads to worse treatment outcomes, higher hospital admission rates, increased healthcare costs, and increased morbidity and mortality rates. While some instances of medication non-adherence are a result of problems with the treatment plan or barriers caused by the health care provider, many are instances caused by patient-related factors such as forgetting, running out of medication, and not understanding the required dosages. This presents a clear need for patient-centered systems that can reliably increase medication adherence. To that end, in this work we describe an activity recognition system capable of recognizing when individuals take medication in an unconstrained, real-world environment. Our methodology uses a modified version of the Bagging ensemble method to suit unbalanced data and a classifier trained on the prediction probabilities of the Bagging classifier to identify when individuals took medication during a full-day study. Using this methodology we are able to recognize when individuals took medication with an F-measure of 0.77. Our system is a first step towards developing personal health interfaces that are capable of providing personalized medication adherence interventions.more » « less
-
Abstract ObjectiveTo understand the perspectives of home health aides (HHAs) toward their own health and health behaviors, and how their job impacts both. Data Sources and Study SettingInterviews were conducted with 28 HHAs from 16 unique home care agencies from August 2021 to January 2022. The study was conducted in partnership with the 1199SEIU Training and Employment Fund, a labor‐management fund of the largest health care union in the US. Study DesignA qualitative study with English and Spanish‐speaking HHAs. Interviews were conducted using a semi‐structured topic guide, informed by Pender's Health Promotion Model and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's Total Worker Health Model. To be eligible, HHAs had to be currently employed by a home care agency in New York, NY. Data Collection/Extraction MethodsInterviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Principal FindingsThe 28 HHAs had a mean age of 47.6 years (SD 11.1), 39% were non‐Hispanic Black, 43% were Hispanic, and they had a mean of 14.1 years (SD 7.8) of job experience. Five themes emerged; HHAs were: (1) Healthy enough to work, but were managing their own chronic conditions while working; (2) Motivated to be healthy, in part driven by their desire to care for others; (3) Worked closely with sick patients, which influenced their perceptions of health; (4) Experienced occupational and patient‐level barriers to practicing healthy behaviors; (5) Sought support and resources to improve their health and wellbeing. ConclusionsHHAs have numerous health challenges, many of which are influenced by their job. Culturally and occupationally tailored interventions may mitigate the barriers that HHAs experience to achieve optimal health.more » « less
