An official website of the United States government
The ability to acquire information about the environment through social observation or instruction is an essential form of learning in humans and other animals. Here, we assessed the ability of rats to acquire an association between a light stimulus and the presentation of a reward that is either hidden (sucrose solution) or visible (food pellet) via observation of a trained demonstrator. Subsequent training of observers on the light-reward association indicated that while observation alone was not sufficient for observers to acquire the association, contact with the reward location was higher in observers that were paired with a demonstrator. However, this was only true when the light cue predicted a sucrose reward. Additionally, we found that in the visible reward condition, levels of demonstrator orienting and food cup contact during the observation period tended to be positively correlated with the corresponding behaviour of their observer. This relationship was only seen during later sessions of observer training. Together, these results suggest that while our models were not sufficient to induce associative learning through observation alone, demonstrator behaviour during observation did influence how their paired observer's behavioural response to the cue evolved over the course of direct individual training.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 1, 2026
Early Emergence of Metacognition in Rhesus Monkeys
ABSTRACT Metacognition, or monitoring and controlling one's knowledge, is a key feature of human cognition. Accumulating evidence shows that foundational forms of metacognition are already present in young infants and then scaffold later‐emerging skills. Although many animals exhibit cognitive processes relevant to metacognition, it is unclear if other species share the developmental trajectories seen in humans. Here, we examine the emergence of metacognitive information‐seeking in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). We presented a large sample of semi‐free‐ranging monkeys, ranging from juvenility to adulthood, with a one‐shot task where they could seek information about a food reward by bending down to peer into a center vantage point in an array of tubes. In thehiddencondition, information‐seeking was necessary as no food was visible on the apparatus, whereas in thevisiblecontrol, condition information‐seeking was not necessary to detect the location of the reward. Monkeys sought information at the center vantage point more often when it was necessary than in the control condition, and younger monkeys already showed competency similar to adults. We also tracked additional monkeys who voluntarily chose not to approach to assess monkeys’ ability to actively infer opportunities for information‐seeking, and again found similar performance in juveniles and adults. Finally, we found that monkeys were overall slower to make metacognitive inferences than to approach known reward, and that younger monkeys were specifically slower to detect opportunities for information‐seeking compared to adults. These results indicate that many features of mature metacognition are already detectable in young monkeys, paralleling evidence for “core metacognition” in infant humans.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1944881
- PAR ID:
- 10584640
- Publisher / Repository:
- Developmental Science
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Developmental Science
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1363-755X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Despite their ability to answer complex questions, it is unclear whether generative chatbots should be considered experts in any domain. There are several important cognitive and metacognitive differences that separate human experts from generative chatbots. First, human experts’ domain knowledge is deep, efficiently structured, adaptive, and intuitive – whereas generative chatbots’ knowledge is shallow and inflexible, leading to errors that human experts would rarely make. Second, generative chatbots lack access to critical metacognitive capacities that allow humans to detect errors in their own thinking and communicate this information to others. Though generative chatbots may surpass human experts in the future – for now, the nature of their knowledge structures and metacognition prevent them from reaching true expertise.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT ObjectivesWild juvenile capuchins exhibit lower feeding success than adults, particularly for mechanically challenging foods, but ontogenetic changes in oral food processing behaviors related to this reduced success are unknown. We test how oral food processing efficiency varies across development in an experimental setting in tufted capuchins (Sapajusspp.). Further, we simulate discontinuous feeding observations to test the comparability of behaviors measured in wild and captive settings. Materials and MethodsTwenty‐nine captive and semi‐wild infants (n = 2), juveniles (n = 12), older juveniles (n = 4), and subadults‐adults (n = 11) were video recorded while feeding at the Núcleo de Procriação de Macacos‐Prego Research Center (Araçatuba, Brazil). Each animal was offered a series of five foods ranging in volume, toughness, and elastic modulus. ResultsMeasures of oral food processing inconsistently varied with sex; however, younger animals were less efficient in food processing than older individuals. Larger and more mechanically challenging foods were associated with longer feeding sequence durations and an increased frequency of anterior ingestion, posterior ingestion, and chewing during a feeding sequence. Simulated discontinuous data from the first and last halves of the feeding sequences closely replicated continuous results. ConclusionsOur results indicate younger capuchins have reduced oral food processing efficiency compared to adults through increased duration, behavioral frequencies, number of chews, and behavioral patterns. Further, our continuous and discontinuous comparisons support the use of discontinuous feeding behaviors from the first and last halves of the feeding sequence. We caution that researchers should be careful to capture infrequent behaviors when using discontinuous data.more » « less
-
We examined whether framing younger and older adults learning goals in terms of maximizing gains or minimizing losses impacts their ability to selectively remember high-value information. Specifically, we presented younger and older adults with lists of words paired with point values and participants were either told that they would receive the value associated with each word if they recalled it on a test or that they would lose the points associated with each word if they failed to recall it on the test. We also asked participants to predict the likelihood of recalling each word to deter- mine if younger and older adults were metacognitively aware of any potential framing effects. Results revealed that older adults expected to be more selective when their goals were framed in terms of losses, but younger adults expected to be more selective when their goals were framed in terms of gains. However, this was not the case as both younger and older adults were more selective for high-value informa- tion when their goals were framed in terms of maximizing gains compared with minimizing losses. Thus, the framing of learning goals can impact metacognitive decisions and subsequent memory in both younger and older adults.more » « less
-
Nonhuman animals can engage in forms of metacognitive control and monitoring processes. However, very little testing of the relation between fluency and metacognition has been done in animals, and little research has assessed memory performance in relation to animals making immediate versus delayed judgments of their memory. Here, wagers made by monkeys during test trials served as a form of confidence measure of how well they could complete a memory test. These wagers occurred either after the delay interval between the sample presentation and the test (delayed judgments) or after the sample presentation but before the delay interval and the test (immediate judgments). Overall, no significant difference in performance was found between these two conditions. We also manipulated the fluency of stimuli by either contrasting small (low fluency) or large (high fluency) stimuli or by manipulating size and the degree to which stimuli were of similar perceptual classes (low fluency, harder to distinguish stimuli such as triangular shapes) or were dissimilar in color and shape (high fluency, clip art images). Although low fluency stimuli were remembered at lower levels, the monkeys showed no evidence of adjusting wagering behavior as a function of stimulus type. Thus, the present experiment showed no evidence that monkeys benefitted from delay of judgments of memory and no evidence of stimulus fluency affecting their confidence as measured by their wagering. Rather, most monkeys preferred consistent wagers across all trial types. This may indicate a metacognitive limitation or some other form of behavioral satisficing that led to suboptimal performance.more » « less
