skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Cold Region River Flood Mapping and Scour Potential Prediction: Insights from Hydraulic Model Using Advanced Autonomous Surface Vehicles
Abstract This study aimed to map the 2022 flood with a 16.5-year return period near a bridge on the Red River, close to Grafton City, North Dakota, and evaluate the scour potential around the bridge. The Red River Basin (RRB) near Grand Forks, ND, and Emerson, ND, is a cold region river vulnerable to floods. Local scouring around bridge piers during floods can lead to hydraulic structure failure. An Autonomous Surface Vehicle (ASV) equipped with LiDAR DEM data from the ND DWR’s LiDAR dataset was used to collect comprehensive bathymetry and discharge data, including the 2022 flood. The HEC-RAS model was used to create flood maps, and the Colorado State University (CSU) methodology was employed to assess local scour around the bridge pier. The study area recorded maximum velocities of 1.71 m/s, 1.87 m/s, and 1.56 m/s for discharge values of 368 m3/s, 784 m3/s, and 1335 m3/s, respectively, with higher velocities recorded upstream of the bridge. The maximum water depth reached 13.14 m during the peak discharge of 1335 m3/s. Higher discharge resulted in increased Froude number and contraction scour depth, with the latter continuing to increase even when the Froude number decreased as water reached the bridge deck. The study highlights the effectiveness of integrating ASVs, bathymetry, and LiDAR data to comprehensively understand flood dynamics and bridge scour in cold region rivers, offering the way for the development of effective flood control measures and strategies to safeguard critical infrastructure.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2146078
PAR ID:
10587424
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Springer
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Environmental Processes
Volume:
11
Issue:
3
ISSN:
2198-7491
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Catastrophic drainage of glacial Lake Missoula through the Columbia River Gorge, USA, produced some of the largest floods ever known. However, erosion of the gorge during flooding has not been quantified, hindering discharge reconstructions and our understanding of landscape change by megafloods. Using a neural network and geomorphic observations, we reconstructed the gorge topography and found ∼7.4 km3of rock was eroded from gorge walls. Accounting for a narrower canyon and matching flood high‐water marks resulted in peak‐flood discharge reconstructions of 6 × 106–7 × 106 m3 s−1, which are 30%–40% lower than prior estimates based on the present‐day topography. Sediment transport modeling indicated that more frequent intermediate‐sized floods transported most of the eroded rock. Thus, similar to alluvial rivers, discharge magnitude‐frequency tradeoffs may also govern canyon formation by repeated megafloods. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Bedrock erosion and canyon formation during extreme floods have dramatically altered landscapes on Earth and Mars. Grand Coulee was carved by outburst floods from Pleistocene glacial Lake Missoula and is the largest canyon in the Channeled Scabland, a megaflood‐scoured landscape in the northwestern USA. Quantifying paleo‐discharge is required to understand how landscapes evolve in response to extreme events, but there are few constraints on the magnitude of the floods that incised Grand Coulee; hence, we used hydraulic modeling and geologic evidence to quantify paleo‐flood discharges during different phases of canyon incision. When upper Grand Coulee was incising by headward waterfall retreat, the paleo‐discharge was 2.6 × 106 m3s−1, which produced shear stresses great enough to cause the waterfall to retreat via toppling of basalt columns. The largest possible flood through upper Grand Coulee, a Missoula flood which raised glacial Lake Columbia to a stage of 750 m, produced a modeled discharge of 7.6 × 106 m3s−1. The discharges associated with waterfall retreat and drainage of glacial Lake Columbia are >80% and ∼50% lower, respectively, than the 14–17 × 106 m3s−1discharge predicted by assuming the present‐day topography was inundated to the elevation of high‐water marks. Due to bedrock incision, high‐water marks may overestimate paleo‐flow depth in canyons carved by floods, hence bedrock erosion should be considered when estimating paleo‐discharge in flood‐carved canyons. Our results indicate that outburst floods with discharges and flow depths much lower than those required to inundate high‐water marks are capable of carving deep canyons. 
    more » « less
  3. From June 10-13 of 2022, an atmospheric river delivered heavy rain to high elevations around northern Yellowstone National Park (YNP), resulting in extreme flooding in the Yellowstone River basin below Yellowstone Lake. The extreme 2022 flood was only one of several historical events caused by high June temperatures and rapid snowmelt, with a variable component of rain on snow. Large and extreme floods on the Yellowstone River (YR) also occurred in June 1996 and 1918, allowing comparison of their magnitude, duration, and mechanisms of generation for the YR and its Lamar River and Soda Butte Creek tributaries. In 2022, peak discharge on the YR at Corwin Springs was 1550 m3/s, the flood of record and 170% of the 1996 peak, and Lamar River peak discharge was 172% of 1996 peak. In 1918, gaged discharge is only available for the YR at Corwin Springs, with significant uncertainty. On Soda Butte Creek, however, overbank gravels and indirect discharge estimates indicate that the 1918 peak discharge was conservatively 240% higher than 1996 and 127% higher than 2022. In 2022, flood duration above 700 m3/s at the YR Corwin Springs gage was only 2 days, compared to 9 days in 1996 and 14 days in 1918. In early June 1918 and 1996, snowpack was above average, and anomalously warm weather combined with relatively minor rainfall to produce long-duration flooding. In early June 2022, similarly high temperatures occurred, but snowpack was less than in 1918; early May snowpack in 2022 was 64% that of 1996. The June 10-13 atmospheric river released 5-10 cm of rain across northern YNP that added to snowmelt, producing a short duration but extremely high peak discharge. The 2022 flood caused major bank erosion especially in confined reaches but resulted in less floodplain disruption and overbank gravel deposition than in 1918 on the Lamar River and Soda Butte Creek. The potential exists for an even larger peak discharge than in 2022 if atmospheric river rainfall as in 2022 is superimposed on rapid melting of a deep snowpack, caused by the kind of unseasonable warmth that occurred in 1997 and 1918. Anthropogenic climate change is likely to increase the probability of extreme floods in YNP, as higher temperatures increase snowmelt rates, shift late-spring precipitation from snow to rain, and promote widespread intense rainfall including that from atmospheric rivers. 
    more » « less
  4. In June of 2022 an extreme atmospheric river flood caused extensive bank erosion and infrastructure damage in northern Yellowstone National Park (YNP). On the lower Lamar River, peak discharge was 170% of the next highest peak of 1996 (gaged since 1923) and resulted in widespread overbank gravel deposition and channel change. In June 1918, however, flooding on the Lamar system produced similar peak flows, as shown by indirect discharge estimates and tree-ring dating. In 2022, peak discharges and flood effects varied considerably in northern YNP. The upper Lamar River had a peak discharge significantly less than 1918, likely the result of less precipitation and snowmelt in the relatively low elevations of the upper Lamar drainage in the Absaroka Range. The high flows experienced by the lower Lamar River, however, were the result of extreme discharges in tributaries that drain the Beartooth Range where Soda Butte Creek and Pebble Creek had discharges similar or greater than 1918 and discharge on Slough Creek produced extensive mid channel bar deposition greater than 2 m. In western YNP, the Gallatin River experienced little bank erosion or bed material transport, although some reaches showed minor channel scour and gravel bar deposition on glacial outwash substrates. In central YNP, the Gardiner River experienced minimal bank erosion on upper reaches, however, there was extensive bank erosion, landslides, and sediment deposition in the Gardner River Canyon where the steep, confined channel focused stream power along the valley margins. Flood magnitudes differed markedly between the Gallatin and Beartooth drainages despite similar amounts of rainfall and snowmelt. The Gallatin River drainage, dominated by highly fractured and macroporous limestone and extensive thick colluvium with gentler range flanks allows for greater infiltration and reduced peak flows. In contrast, basins in the Beartooth Range drain steeper slopes of low-permeability laharic volcaniclastic rocks, with more exposed bedrock and relief up to 900 m, which promotes rapid runoff and extreme flooding. The frequency and magnitude of rain-on-snow floods is likely increasing in YNP because of anthropogenic warming, as the high-elevation snowpack becomes more susceptible to rapid melting and late spring precipitation shifts from snow to rain. 
    more » « less
  5. In June of 2022 an extreme atmospheric river flood caused extensive bank erosion and infrastructure damage in northern Yellowstone National Park (YNP). On the lower Lamar River, peak discharge was 170% of the next highest peak of 1996 (gaged since 1923) and resulted in widespread overbank gravel deposition and channel change. In June 1918, however, flooding on the Lamar system produced similar peak flows, as shown by indirect discharge estimates and tree-ring dating. In 2022, peak discharges and flood effects varied considerably in northern YNP. The upper Lamar River had a peak discharge significantly less than 1918, likely the result of less precipitation and snowmelt in the relatively low elevations of the upper Lamar drainage in the Absaroka Range. The high flows experienced by the lower Lamar River, however, were the result of extreme discharges in tributaries that drain the Beartooth Range where Soda Butte Creek and Pebble Creek had discharges similar or greater than 1918 and discharge on Slough Creek produced extensive mid channel bar deposition greater than 2 m. In western YNP, the Gallatin River experienced little bank erosion or bed material transport, although some reaches showed minor channel scour and gravel bar deposition on glacial outwash substrates. In central YNP, the Gardiner River experienced minimal bank erosion on upper reaches, however, there was extensive bank erosion, landslides, and sediment deposition in the Gardner River Canyon where the steep, confined channel focused stream power along the valley margins. Flood magnitudes differed markedly between the Gallatin and Beartooth drainages despite similar amounts of rainfall and snowmelt. The Gallatin River drainage, dominated by highly fractured and macroporous limestone and extensive thick colluvium with gentler range flanks allows for greater infiltration and reduced peak flows. In contrast, basins in the Beartooth Range drain steeper slopes of low-permeability laharic volcaniclastic rocks, with more exposed bedrock and relief up to 900 m, which promotes rapid runoff and extreme flooding. The frequency and magnitude of rain-on-snow floods is likely increasing in YNP because of anthropogenic warming, as the high-elevation snowpack becomes more susceptible to rapid melting and late spring precipitation shifts from snow to rain. 
    more » « less