skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on March 1, 2026

Title: Hydrologic pathways and baseflow contributions, and not the proximity of sediment sources, determine the shape of sediment hysteresis curves: Theory development and application in a karst basin in Kentucky USA
Award ID(s):
1933779
PAR ID:
10588816
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Elsevier
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Hydrology
Volume:
649
Issue:
C
ISSN:
0022-1694
Page Range / eLocation ID:
132300
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Understanding when gravel moves in river beds is essential for a range of different applications but is still surprisingly hard to predict. Here we consider how our ability to predict critical shear stress (τc) is being improved by recent advances in two areas: (1) identifying the onset of bedload transport; and (2) quantifying grain‐scale gravel bed structure. This paper addresses these areas through both an in‐depth review and a comparison of new datasets of gravel structure collected using three different methods. We focus on advances in these two areas because of the need to understand how the conditions for sediment entrainment vary spatially and temporally, and because spatial and temporal changes in grain‐scale structure are likely to be a major driver of changes inτc. We use data collected from a small gravel‐bed stream using direct field‐based measurements, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and computed tomography (CT) scanning, which is the first time that these methods have been directly compared. Using each method, we measure structure‐relevant metrics including grain size distribution, grain protrusion and fine matrix content. We find that all three methods produce consistent measures of grain size, but that there is less agreement between measurements of grain protrusion and fine matrix content. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract At subduction zones, significant volumes of sediments and other crustal material are carried on top of the downgoing plate past the trench and into the mantle. This represents the dominant process by which material from the Earth's surface is recycled to the interior. However, the fate of these recycled materials is uncertain. Subducted material may be carried with the slab into the deep mantle, or it may form diapirs that ascend into the hotter portions of the mantle wedge, where they can melt and/or be relaminated to the base of the arc crust. While this material can be a mixture (or “mélange”) of sediments, oceanic crust and mantle rocks, here we focus on the dynamics of the uppermost layer of sediments on the downgoing slab. We modified a thermodynamic model to accurately predict the equilibrium mineral assemblage, melting behavior, and density of a range of subducted sediment compositions at pressure and temperature conditions relevant to subduction zones. Using this thermodynamic model, we constructed a coupled dynamic model of sediment diapirs and identified the primary parameters that control diapir behavior: sediment thickness and composition, and the thermal state of the subduction zone. Relamination of ascending diapirs is favored by greater sediment thicknesses, more felsic compositions, and warmer thermal conditions. By contrast, diapirism is suppressed in colder arcs, or where subducted sediment layers are thin or more mafic. Applying this model to modern subduction zones suggests that multiple processes are active today, with relamination occurring in a significant subset of modern arcs. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Purpose The equilibrium sediment exchange process is defined as instantaneous deposition of suspended sediment to the streambed countered by equal erosion of sediment from the streambed. Equilibrium exchange has rarely been included in sediment transport studies but is needed when the sediment continuum is used to investigate the earth’s critical zone. Materials and methods Numericalmodeling in the watershed uplands and streamcorridor simulates sediment yield and sediment source partitioning for the Upper South Elkhorn watershed in Kentucky, USA.We simulate equilibrium exchange when uplandderived sediment simultaneously deposits to the streambed while streambed sediments erode. Sediment fingerprinting with stable carbon isotopes allowed constraint of the process in a gently rolling watershed. Results and discussion Carbon isotopes work well to partition upland sediment versus streambed sediment because sediment deposited in the streambed accrues a unique autotrophic, i.e., algal, fingerprint. Stable nitrogen isotopes do not work well to partition the sources in this study because the nitrogen isotope fingerprint of algae falls in the middle of the nitrogen isotope fingerprint of upland sediment. The source of sediment depends on flow intensity for the gently rolling watershed. Streambed sediments dominate the fluvial load for low and moderate events, while upland sediments become increasingly important during high flows and extreme events.We used sediment fingerprinting results to calibrate the equilibrium sediment exchange rate in the watershed sediment transport model. Conclusions Our sediment fingerprinting and modeling evidence suggest equilibrium sediment exchange is a substantial process occurring in the system studied. The process does not change the sediment load or streambed sediment storage but does impact the quality of sediment residing in the streambed. Therefore, we suggest equilibrium sediment exchange should be considered when the sediment continuumis used to investigate the critical zone.We conclude the paper by outlining future research priorities for coupling sediment fingerprinting with watershed modeling. 
    more » « less