skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Biodiversity of macroalgae does not differentially suppress coral performance: The other side of a biodiversity issue
Abstract Hundreds of studies now document positive relationships between biodiversity and critical ecosystem processes, but as ecological communities worldwide shift toward new species configurations, less is known regarding how the biodiversity of undesirable species will shape the functioning of ecosystems or foundation species. We manipulated macroalgal species richness in experimental field plots to test whether and how the identity and diversity of competing macroalgae affected the growth, survival, and microbiome of a common coral in Mo'orea, French Polynesia. Compared to controls without algal competitors, coral growth was significantly suppressed across three macroalgal monocultures, a polyculture of the same three macroalgae, and plots containing inert seaweed mimics; coral mortality was limited and did not differ significantly among treatments. One macroalga suppressed coral growth significantly less than the other two, but none differed from the inert mimic in terms of coral suppression. The composition, dispersion, and diversity of coral microbiomes in treatments with live macroalgae or inert plastic mimics did not differ from controls experiencing no competition. Microbiome composition differed between two macroalgal monocultures and a monoculture versus plastic mimics, but no other microbiome differences were observed among macroalgal or mimic treatments. Together, these findings suggest that algal diversity does not alter harmful impacts of macroalgae on coral performance, which could be accounted for by physical structure alone in these field experiments. While enhancing biodiversity is a recognized strategy for promoting desirable species, it would be worrisome if biodiversity also enhanced the negative impacts of undesirable species. We documented no such effects in this investigation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2224354 1947522
PAR ID:
10591816
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Ecology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Ecology
Volume:
105
Issue:
7
ISSN:
0012-9658
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. As coral reefs degrade worldwide, researchers and managers need to determine whether corals can acclimatize to altered local conditions or whether their fixed phenotypes prevent coral persistence under these new environmental conditions. Fixed phenotypes could produce environmental mismatches that reduce population connectivity and exacerbate decline in the near-term, but a capacity for acclimatization could be harnessed in both passive and proactive coral restoration efforts. Here, we conducted a reciprocal transplant experiment in Mo‘orea, French Polynesia, to test how intraspecific performance of 2 common coral species (Acropora hyacinthusandPocillopora verrucosa) varied between a neighboring forereef and backreef that differed dramatically in trajectories of coral loss, resilience over decadal time scales, and cover of corals versus competing macroalgae. We also tested how corals responded to 2 common stressors—corallivory and macroalgal competition—and how this varied as a function of transplant location and the area of origin. Growth and survival of both coral species were affected by macroalgal competition, corallivory, transplant location, or some combination thereof, but we found limited evidence that the habitat of origin significantly impacted intraspecific performance. These results suggest that acclimatization capacity may outweigh local adaptation for these common reef-building species and could be leveraged to facilitate coral restoration. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    While studies show that nutrient pollution shifts reef trophic interactions between fish, macroalgae, and corals, we know less about how the microbiomes associated with these organisms react to such disturbances. To investigate how microbiome dynamics are affected during nutrient pollution, we exposed replicate Porites lobata corals colonized by the fish Stegastes nigricans, which farm an algal matrix on the coral, to a pulse of nutrient enrichment over a two-month period and examined the microbiome of each partner using 16S amplicon analysis. We found 51 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) shared among the three hosts. Coral microbiomes had the lowest diversity with over 98% of the microbiome dominated by a single genus, Endozoicomonas. Fish and algal matrix microbiomes were ~20 to 70× more diverse and had higher evenness compared to the corals. The addition of nutrients significantly increased species richness and community variability between samples of coral microbiomes but not the fish or algal matrix microbiomes, demonstrating that coral microbiomes are less resistant to nutrient pollution than their trophic partners. Furthermore, the 51 common ASVs within the 3 hosts indicate microbes that may be shared or transmitted between these closely associated organisms, including Vibrionaceae bacteria, many of which can be pathogenic to corals. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The relationship between diversity and stability remains a key question in ecology and has important consequences for understanding the sustainability (and profitability) of bioenergy cropping systems; yet to date, little work has been done to examine these relationships in agricultural systems directly. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between biodiversity (in number of planted species) and the stability of biomass production in four experimental bioenergy cropping systems established in Wisconsin and Michigan. Species composition and aboveground production were monitored at all sites for 8–10 years (2010–2019) allowing us to evaluate the temporal stability of biomass yield (defined as the temporal mean divided by the temporal SD) in these cropping systems. A major regional drought in 2012 also allowed us to evaluate resistance and resilience. Although three of the cropping systems were established with the same seed mixtures and were managed in the same way, species composition differed markedly between sites. This limited our ability to attribute differences within cropping systems across sites to the abundance of specific species. Overall, there was no clear relationship between planted species richness and yield stability in biomass production at these sites. At both sites, the lowest diversity system (switchgrass monoculture) had the highest interannual stability in production and was equivalent to that of the highest diversity treatment (prairie). Resilience to the drought was high in all treatments and did not differ among the four cropping systems; however, resistance to drought differed among systems and was highest in the switchgrass monocultures at both sites. The abundance of perennial C4grasses increased over time in all cropping systems, except for the successional plots. The persistence of annual species in the successional treatments at both sites likely contributed to low stability and high interannual turnover in this system. We found no evidence that increasing the diversity of planted species in bioenergy cropping systems enhances stability in aboveground biomass production; nor was there any difference in resistance or resilience to drought. The higher costs of establishing more diverse bioenergy cropping systems may be warranted if other ecosystem services, such as supporting diverse pollinator and predator insect species at the landscape scale, are desired from bioenergy crops in addition to biomass production. 
    more » « less
  4. As coral reefs face accelerating threats at global scales, examining how different coral species respond to local disruption from top-down and bottom-up forces can inform management at local scales. This may provide additional time for reducing global stressors. We conducted a full factorial experiment examining the effects of corallivory, herbivory, and fertilizer addition on 2 corals:Acropora pulchraandPorites rus, the former of which is faster-growing but more susceptible to predation, disease, and heat-induced mortality. Fertilizer addition enhanced corallivory but did not affect net coral growth. Consumer exclusion enhanced the net growth ofA. pulchraby 18.1 times regardless of fertilizer treatment, while the net growth ofP. rusdid not differ among caging and fertilizer treatments.A. pulchrawas rarely overgrown by algae regardless of treatment, while herbivore exclusion and fertilizer enrichment produced opposing effects on overgrowth ofP. rus. In uncaged treatments, fertilizer enrichment led to greater herbivory but also 1.8 times greater algal overgrowth ofP. rusrelative to unfertilized treatments. However, in caged treatments, algal overgrowth ofP. ruswas 1.9 times higher in unfertilized versus fertilized treatments. Our results suggest that interactions between corallivory, herbivory, and fertilizer enrichment can have alternative effects on different coral species, with a hardier coral experiencing more negative impacts of fertilizer enrichment than a more sensitive coral, which was, in turn, more strongly suppressed by predation. Local stressors that disrupt top-down and bottom-up processes may increase the vulnerability of even the most robust corals, and it is these corals that have been predicted to become more common under future ocean scenarios. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract We introduce a new “ecosystem‐scale” experiment at the Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in central Minnesota, USA to test long‐term ecosystem consequences of tree diversity and composition. The experiment—the largest of its kind in North America—was designed to provide guidance on forest restoration efforts that will advance carbon sequestration goals and contribute to biodiversity conservation and sustainability.The new Forest and Biodiversity (FAB2) experiment uses native tree species in varying levels of species richness, phylogenetic diversity and functional diversity planted in 100 m2and 400 m2plots at 1 m spacing, appropriate for testing long‐term ecosystem consequences. FAB2 was designed and established in conjunction with a prior experiment (FAB1) in which the same set of 12 species was planted in 16 m2plots at 0.5 m spacing. Both are adjacent to the BioDIV prairie‐grassland diversity experiment, enabling comparative investigations of diversity and ecosystem function relationships between experimental grasslands and forests at different planting densities and plot sizes.Within the first 6 years, mortality in 400 m2monoculture plots was higher than in 100 m2plots. The highest mortality occurred inTilia americanaandAcer negundomonocultures, but mortality for both species decreased with increasing plot diversity. These results demonstrate the importance of forest diversity in reducing mortality in some species and point to potential mechanisms, including light and drought stress, that cause tree mortality in vulnerable monocultures. The experiment highlights challenges to maintaining monoculture and low‐diversity treatments in tree mixture experiments of large extent.FAB2 provides a long‐term platform to test the mechanisms and processes that contribute to forest stability and ecosystem productivity in changing environments. Its ecosystem‐scale design, and accompanying R package, are designed to discern species and lineage effects and multiple dimensions of diversity to inform restoration of ecosystem functions and services from forests. It also provides a platform for improving remote sensing approaches, including Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) equipped with LiDAR, multispectral and hyperspectral sensors, to complement ground‐based monitoring. We aim for the experiment to contribute to international efforts to monitor and manage forests in the face of global change. 
    more » « less