More Like this

1. Dating lacustrine carbonate strata with detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology

   https://doi.org/10.1130/G48070.1  

   Finzel, Emily S.; Rosenblume, Justin A. (November 2020, Geology)

   null (Ed.)

   Abstract Carbonate lacustrine strata in nonmarine systems hold great potential for refining depositional ages through U-Pb dating of detrital zircons. The low clastic sediment flux in carbonate depositional environments may increase the relative proportion of zircons deposited by volcanic air fall, potentially increasing the chances of observing detrital ages near the true depositional age. We present U-Pb geochronology of detrital zircons from lacustrine carbonate strata that provides proof of concept for the effectiveness of both acid-digestion recovery and resolving depositional ages of nonmarine strata. Samples were collected from Early Cretaceous foreland basin fluvial sandstone and lacustrine carbonate in southwestern Montana (USA). Late Aptian–early Albian (ca. 115–110 Ma) maximum depositional ages young upsection and agree with biostratigraphic ages. Lacustrine carbonate is an important component in many types of tectonic basins, and application of detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology holds considerable potential for dating critical chemical and climatic events recorded in their stratigraphy. It could also reveal new information for the persistent question about whether the stratigraphic record is dominated by longer periods of background fine-grained sedimentation versus short-duration coarse-grained events. In tectonically active basins, lacustrine carbonates may be valuable for dating the beginning of tectonic subsidence, especially during periods of finer-grained deposition dominated by mudrocks and carbonates. 

   more » « less
2. A robust age model for the Cryogenian Pocatello Formation of southeastern Idaho (northwestern USA) from tandem in situ and isotope dilution U-Pb dating of volcanic tuffs and epiclastic detrital zircons

   https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02437.1  

   Isakson, Vincent H.; Schmitz, Mark D.; Dehler, Carol M.; Macdonald, Francis A.; Adolph Yonkee, W. (February 2022, Geosphere)

   Abstract Tandem in situ and isotope dilution U-Pb analysis of zircons from pyroclastic volcanic rocks and both glacial and non-glacial sedimentary strata of the Pocatello Formation (Idaho, northwestern USA) provides new age constraints on Cryogenian glaciation in the North American Cordillera. Two dacitic tuffs sampled within glacigenic strata of the lower diamictite interval of the Scout Mountain Member yield high-precision chemical abrasion isotope dilution U-Pb zircon eruption and depositional ages of 696.43 ± 0.21 and 695.17 ± 0.20 Ma. When supplemented by a new high-precision detrital zircon maximum depositional age of ≤670 Ma for shoreface and offshore sandstones unconformably overlying the lower diamictite, these data are consistent with correlation of the lower diamictite to the early Cryogenian (ca. 717–660 Ma) Sturtian glaciation. These 670–675 Ma zircons persist in beds above the upper diamictite and cap dolostone units, up to and including a purported “reworked fallout tuff,” which we instead conclude provides only a maximum depositional age of ≤673 Ma from epiclastic volcanic detritus. Rare detrital zircons as young as 658 Ma provide a maximum depositional age for the upper diamictite and overlying cap dolostone units. This new geochronological framework supports litho- and chemostratigraphic correlations of the lower and upper diamictite intervals of the Scout Mountain Member of the Pocatello Formation with the Sturtian (716–660 Ma) and Marinoan (≤650–635 Ma) low-latitude glaciations, respectively. The Pocatello Formation thus contains a more complete record of Cryogenian glaciations than previously postulated. 

   more » « less
3. Age and provenance relationships between the basal Great Valley Group and its underlying basement: implications for initiation of the Great Valley forearc basin, California, U.S.A.

   https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2024.004  

   Romero, Mariah C; Orme, Devon A; Surpless, Kathleen D; Ronemus, Chance B; Morrow, Zachary (October 2024, Journal of Sedimentary Research)

   ABSTRACT The Great Valley forearc (GVf) basin, California, records deposition along the western margin of North America during active oceanic subduction from Jurassic through Paleogene time. Along the western GVf, its underlying basement, the Coast Range Ophiolite (CRO), is exposed as a narrow outcrop belt. CRO segments are overlain by the Great Valley Group (GVG), and locally, an ophiolitic breccia separates the CRO from basal GVG strata. New stratigraphic, petrographic, and geochronologic data (3865 detrital and 68 igneous zircon U-Pb ages) from the upper CRO, ophiolitic breccia, and basal GVG strata clarify temporal relationships among the three units, constrain maximum depositional ages (MDAs), and identify provenance signatures of the ophiolitic breccia and basal GVG strata. Gabbroic rocks from the upper CRO yield zircon U-Pb ages of 168.0 ± 1.3 Ma and 165.1 ± 1.2 Ma. Prominent detrital-zircon age populations of the ophiolitic breccia and GVG strata comprise Jurassic and Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ages, respectively, with pre-Mesozoic ages in both that are consistent with sources of North America affinity. Combined with petrographic modal analyses that show abundant volcanic grains (> 50%), we interpret the breccia to be mainly derived from the underlying CRO, with limited input from the hinterland of North America, and the basal GVG to be derived from Mesozoic igneous and volcanic rocks of the Sierra Nevada–Klamath magmatic arc and hinterland. Analysis of detrital-zircon grains from the lower and upper ophiolitic breccia yields MDAs of ∼ 166 Ma and ∼ 151 Ma, respectively. Along-strike variation in Jurassic and Cretaceous MDAs from basal GVG strata range from ∼ 148 to 141 Ma, which are interpreted to reflect diachronous deposition in segmented depocenters during early development of the forearc. The ophiolitic breccia was deposited in a forearc position proximal to North America < 4 Myr before the onset of GVG deposition. A new tectonic model for early development of the GVf highlights the role of forearc extension coeval with magmatic arc compression during the earliest stages of basin development. 

   more » « less
4. Age and provenance relationships between the basal Great Valley Group and its underlying basement: implications for initiation of the Great Valley forearc basin, California, U.S.A.

   https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2024.004.2024.004  

   Romero, Mariah C; Orme, Devon A; Surpless, Kathleen D; Ronemus, Chance B; Morrow, Zachary (October 2024, Journal of Sedimentary Research)

   Kaczmarek, Stephen; Sweet, Dustin (Ed.)

   ABSTRACT The Great Valley forearc (GVf) basin, California, records deposition along the western margin of North America during active oceanic subduction from Jurassic through Paleogene time. Along the western GVf, its underlying basement, the Coast Range Ophiolite (CRO), is exposed as a narrow outcrop belt. CRO segments are overlain by the Great Valley Group (GVG), and locally, an ophiolitic breccia separates the CRO from basal GVG strata. New stratigraphic, petrographic, and geochronologic data (3865 detrital and 68 igneous zircon U-Pb ages) from the upper CRO, ophiolitic breccia, and basal GVG strata clarify temporal relationships among the three units, constrain maximum depositional ages (MDAs), and identify provenance signatures of the ophiolitic breccia and basal GVG strata. Gabbroic rocks from the upper CRO yield zircon U-Pb ages of 168.0 ± 1.3 Ma and 165.1 ± 1.2 Ma. Prominent detrital-zircon age populations of the ophiolitic breccia and GVG strata comprise Jurassic and Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ages, respectively, with pre-Mesozoic ages in both that are consistent with sources of North America affinity. Combined with petrographic modal analyses that show abundant volcanic grains (> 50%), we interpret the breccia to be mainly derived from the underlying CRO, with limited input from the hinterland of North America, and the basal GVG to be derived from Mesozoic igneous and volcanic rocks of the Sierra Nevada–Klamath magmatic arc and hinterland. Analysis of detrital-zircon grains from the lower and upper ophiolitic breccia yields MDAs of ∼ 166 Ma and ∼ 151 Ma, respectively. Along-strike variation in Jurassic and Cretaceous MDAs from basal GVG strata range from ∼ 148 to 141 Ma, which are interpreted to reflect diachronous deposition in segmented depocenters during early development of the forearc. The ophiolitic breccia was deposited in a forearc position proximal to North America < 4 Myr before the onset of GVG deposition. A new tectonic model for early development of the GVf highlights the role of forearc extension coeval with magmatic arc compression during the earliest stages of basin development. 

   more » « less
5. Age and provenance of the Upper Cretaceous to Paleocene Valdez Group of the Chugach Terrane from the Richardson Highway and Northern Prince William Sound, Alaska.

   https://doi.org/10.1130/abs/2019CD-329673  

   Gross Almonte, N. (April 2019, Proceedings of the Keck Geology Consortium)

   The age and provenance of the southern Alaskan Campanian to Paleocene Valdez Group of the Chugach terrane and its relationship with the younger outboard Paleocene to Eocene Orca Group of the Prince William terrane is poorly understood but an important component of the Cordilleran collage (Plafker et al., 1994). The Valdez and Orca Groups are both part of the Chugach-Prince William terrane (CPW), which is a thick accretionary complex that extends 2200 km along the southern Alaskan margin (Fig. 1; Cowan, 2003). The deep-water turbidites of these terranes are quartzofeldspathic and volcanic-lithic sandstones and basaltic rocks (Dumoulin, 1987; Plafker et al., 1994). The CPW is intruded by near-trench plutons of the Sanak-Baranof belt (Davidson and Garver, 2017) and are believed to be related to a slab window that formed during subduction of Kula-Farallon or Kula- Resurrection spreading ridges (Marshak and Karig, 1977; Delong et al., 1978; Moore et al., 1983; Kusky et al., 1997a; Bradley et al., 2003; Haeussler et al., 2003). There are two hypotheses for the formation of the CPW along the North American Cordilleran margin: 1) either the CPW terrane formed in situ by subduction of the Resurrection plate (Haeussler et al. 2003); or 2) the rocks formed in the Pacific Northwest or California and were transported at least 2000 km along coastwise strike-slip fault systems (Cowan, 2003; Garver and Davidson, 2015). This study is an investigation into the age and provenance of the Valdez Group and its relationship with the Orca Group in the central Chugach Mountains using detrital zircon U-Pb dates. New detrital zircon U-Pb dates and their grain-age distributions from the Valdez and Orca Group turbidites are combined with dates from Kochelek et al. (2011), Amato et al. (2013), and Davidson and Garver (2017) and then synthesized to understand the difference in age between the units and provenance. New and existing U-Pb dates indicate maximum depositional ages (MDA) of the Valdez Group are concentrated in three groups: 84-78 Ma, 74-65 Ma, and 62-60 Ma. The youngest group of MDAs are age-correlative with the Orca Group but were collected from rocks in areas mapped as Valdez Group, indicating that either Orca Group rocks occur in the Valdez Group or the youngest Valdez Group rocks are stratigraphically equivalent to those of the oldest Orca Group. If the latter, the Valdez Group is not Campanian to Maastrichtian in age as has been traditionally viewed (Plafker et al., 1994) but is Upper Cretaceous to Paleocene and in part correlative to the lowest part of the Orca Group. 

   more » « less