An official website of the United States government
Abstract Potential field source surface (PFSS) models are widely used to simulate coronal magnetic fields. PFSS models use the observed photospheric magnetic field as the inner boundary condition and assume a perfectly radial field beyond a “source surface” (Rss). At present, total solar eclipse (TSE) white-light images are the only data that delineate the coronal magnetic field from the photosphere out to several solar radii (R⊙). We utilize a complete solar cycle span of these images between 2008 and 2020 as a benchmark to assess the reliability of PFSS models. For a quantitative assessment, we apply the Rolling Hough Transform to the eclipse data and corresponding PFFS models to measure the difference, Δθ, between the data and model magnetic field lines throughout the corona. We find that the average Δθ, 〈Δθ〉, can be minimized for a given choice ofRssdepending on the phase within a solar cycle. In particular,Rss≈ 1.3R⊙is found to be optimal for solar maximum, whileRss≈ 3R⊙yields a better match at solar minimum. Regardless, large (〈Δθ〉 > 10°) discrepancies between TSE data and PFSS-generated coronal field lines remain regardless of the choice of source surface. However, implementation of solar-cycle-dependentRssoptimal values does yield more reliable PFSS-generated coronal field lines for use in models and for tracing in situ measurements back to their sources at the Sun.
more »
« less
A near-real-time data-assimilative model of the solar corona
The Sun’s corona is its tenuous outer atmosphere of hot plasma, which is difficult to observe. Most models of the corona extrapolate its magnetic field from that measured on the photosphere (the Sun’s optical surface) over a full 27-day solar rotational period, providing a time-stationary approximation. We present a model of the corona that evolves continuously in time, by assimilating photospheric magnetic field observations as they become available. This approach reproduces dynamical features that do not appear in time-stationary models. We used the model to predict coronal structure during the total solar eclipse of 8 April 2024 near the maximum of the solar activity cycle. There is better agreement between the model predictions and eclipse observations in coronal regions located above recently assimilated photospheric data.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10600754
- Author(s) / Creator(s):
- ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
- Publisher / Repository:
- AAAS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Science
- ISSN:
- 0036-8075
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Context.Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of plasma from the Sun that travel through interplanetary space and may encounter Earth. CMEs often enclose a magnetic flux rope (MFR), the orientation of which largely determines the CMEs’ geoeffectiveness. Current operational CME models do not model MFRs, but a number of research ones do, including the Open Solar Physics Rapid Ensemble Information (OSPREI) model. Aims.We report the sensitivity of OSPREI to a range of user-selected photospheric and coronal conditions. Methods.We modeled four separate CMEs observed in situ by Parker Solar Probe (PSP). We varied the input photospheric conditions using four input magnetograms (HMI Synchronic, HMI Synoptic, GONG Synoptic Zero-Point Corrected, and GONG ADAPT). To vary the coronal field reconstruction, we employed the Potential Field Source Surface (PFSS) model and varied its source-surface height in the range 1.5–3.0R⊙with 0.1R⊙increments. Results.We find that both the input magnetogram and PFSS source surface often affect the evolution of the CME as it propagates through the Sun’s corona into interplanetary space, and therefore the accuracy of the MFR prediction compared to in situ data at PSP. There is no obvious best combination of input magnetogram and PFSS source surface height. Conclusions.The OSPREI model is moderately sensitive to the input photospheric and coronal conditions. Based on where the source region of the CME is located on the Sun, there may be best practices when selecting an input magnetogram to use.more » « less
-
Abstract Magnetic flux fills the heliosphere, expands outward from the solar corona, and is fundamentally related to the structure and dynamics of the solar corona and solar wind. Open magnetic flux and the fast wind are thought to originate from open magnetic field lines in coronal holes. Less understood processes in the streamer belt and the boundaries of coronal holes, associated with the more variable slow wind, may be formed by interchange reconnection between open and closed magnetic flux. Interchange reconnection is thought to give rise to field lines that are “folded,” i.e., that turn back on themselves. The properties of strahl electrons measured in the solar wind give clues to the heliospheric magnetic connectivity. Unidirectionally outward strahl indicates open field lines, while bidirectional strahl is associated with closed magnetic flux and coronal mass ejections (CMEs). Inward-directed, unidirectional strahl is believed to indicate folded flux. We use two time-dependent, flux-evolutionary magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models of the combined corona and heliosphere, one for a solar-minimum configuration and one for the 2024 total solar eclipse, to investigate the magnetic connectivity of the corona/heliosphere system. We examine how magnetic connectivity varies with distance from the Sun in the two configurations. We evaluate the evolutionary effects by contrasting time-dependent results with the corresponding steady-state calculations and compare the model connectivities with statistical studies of strahl. The connectivities in the time-evolving simulations are roughly consistent with observed strahl occurrence rates, while those from the steady-state models are not. Our results suggest that complex magnetic connectivities are ubiquitous in the heliosphere.more » « less
-
Abstract Numerical models of the solar wind and coronal mass ejections (CMEs) utilize photospheric magnetic field observations to prescribe the inner boundary conditions for the plasma solutions. These magnetic field data are available to the community through various observational instruments, prepared via different methodologies and/or flux transport models. The solar wind solution driven by these maps provides the ambient plasma environment into which CMEs travel. Interaction with the surrounding solar wind impacts CME evolution and propagation in the solar corona and inner heliosphere. In this work, we use different input magnetic field maps for the same time period to drive the global Alfvén Wave Solar atmosphere Model. We obtain the ambient solar wind conditions and compare the plasma properties and magnetic morphology in the corona domain to study the influence of the input maps. To understand how the resulting coronal solutions impact CMEs, we launch eruptions described by analytical flux ropes into these data-driven solutions and compare their evolution in the coronal domain (up to 24R⊙radially). The CMEs achieve varying speeds, deceleration rates, propagation directions, mass, and energies while coupling with the background solar wind. We quantify these differences to show that the different input driving maps can significantly impact the simulated CME propagation in the solar wind plasma. This also highlights the importance of understanding the uncertainties associated with data-driven modeling that become increasingly important in operational models and space weather prediction.more » « less
-
Abstract We present in this Letter the first global comparison between traditional line-tied steady-state magnetohydrodynamic models and a new, fully time-dependent thermodynamic magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the global corona. To approximate surface magnetic field distributions and magnitudes around solar minimum, we use the Lockheed Evolving Surface-Flux Assimilation Model to obtain input maps that incorporate flux emergence and surface flows over a full solar rotation, including differential rotation and meridional flows. Each time step evolves the previous state of the plasma with a new magnetic field input boundary condition, mimicking photospheric driving on the Sun. We find that this method produces a qualitatively different corona compared to steady-state models. The magnetic energy levels are higher in the time-dependent model, and coronal holes evolve more along the following edge than they do in steady-state models. Coronal changes, as illustrated with forward-modeled emission maps, evolve on longer timescales with time-dependent driving. We discuss implications for active and quiet Sun scenarios, solar wind formation, and widely used steady-state assumptions like potential field source surface calculations.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq0872
