An official website of the United States government
Abstract BackgroundEpigenetic processes are proposed to be a mechanism regulating gene expression during phenotypic plasticity. However, environmentally induced changes in DNA methylation exhibit little-to-no association with differential gene expression in metazoans at a transcriptome-wide level. It remains unexplored whether associations between environmentally induced differential methylation and expression are contingent upon other epigenomic processes such as chromatin accessibility. We quantified methylation and gene expression in larvae of the purple sea urchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratusexposed to different ecologically relevant conditions during gametogenesis (maternal conditioning) and modeled changes in gene expression and splicing resulting from maternal conditioning as functions of differential methylation, incorporating covariates for genomic features and chromatin accessibility. We detected significant interactions between differential methylation, chromatin accessibility, and genic feature type associated with differential expression and splicing. ResultsDifferential gene body methylation had significantly stronger effects on expression among genes with poorly accessible transcriptional start sites while baseline transcript abundance influenced the direction of this effect. Transcriptional responses to maternal conditioning were 4–13 × more likely when accounting for interactions between methylation and chromatin accessibility, demonstrating that the relationship between differential methylation and gene regulation is partially explained by chromatin state. ConclusionsDNA methylation likely possesses multiple associations with gene regulation during transgenerational plasticity inS. purpuratusand potentially other metazoans,but its effects are dependent on chromatin accessibility and underlying genic features.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on June 16, 2026
Nanorate sequencing reveals the Arabidopsis somatic mutation landscape
The rate and spectrum of somatic mutations can diverge from that of germline mutations. This is because somatic tissues experience different mutagenic processes than germline tissues. Here, we use nanorate sequencing (NanoSeq) to identify somatic mutations in Arabidopsis shoots with high sensitivity. We report a somatic mutation rate of 3.6x10^-8 mutations/bp, ~4-5x the germline mutation rate. Somatic mutations displayed elevated signatures consistent with oxidative damage, UV damage, and transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair. Both somatic and germline mutations were enriched in transposable elements and depleted in genes, but this depletion was greater in germline mutations. Somatic mutation rate correlated with proximity to the centromere, DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, and gene/TE content, properties which were also largely true of germline mutations. We note DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility have different predicted effects on mutation rate for genic and non-genic regions; DNA methylation associates with a greater increase in mutation rate when in non-genic regions, and accessible chromatin associates with a lower mutation rate in non-genic regions but a higher mutation rate in genic regions. Together, these results characterize key differences and similarities in the genomic distribution of somatic and germline mutations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2242696
- PAR ID:
- 10600817
- Publisher / Repository:
- bioRxiv
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Institution:
- bioRxiv
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Background Mutations in LMNA , encoding lamin A/C, lead to a variety of diseases known as laminopathies including dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and skeletal abnormalities. Though previous studies have investigated the dysregulation of gene expression in cells from patients with DCM, the role of epigenetic (gene regulatory) mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, has not been thoroughly investigated. Furthermore, the impact of family-specific LMNA mutations on DNA methylation is unknown. Here, we performed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing on ten pairs of fibroblasts and their induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derivatives from two families with DCM due to distinct LMNA mutations, one of which also induces brachydactyly. Results Family-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified by comparing the DNA methylation landscape of patient and control samples. Fibroblast DMRs were found to enrich for distal regulatory features and transcriptionally repressed chromatin and to associate with genes related to phenotypes found in tissues affected by laminopathies. These DMRs, in combination with transcriptome-wide expression data and lamina-associated domain (LAD) organization, revealed the presence of inter-family epimutation hotspots near differentially expressed genes, most of which were located outside LADs redistributed in LMNA -related DCM. Comparison of DMRs found in fibroblasts and iPSCs identified regions where epimutations were persistent across both cell types. Finally, a network of aberrantly methylated disease-associated genes revealed a potential molecular link between pathways involved in bone and heart development. Conclusions Our results identified both shared and mutation-specific laminopathy epimutation landscapes that were consistent with lamin A/C mutation-mediated epigenetic aberrancies that arose in somatic and early developmental cell stages.more » « less
-
Abstract Lung cancer sequencing efforts have uncovered mutational signatures that are attributed to exposure to the cigarette smoke carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene. Benzo[a]pyrene metabolizes in cells to benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) and reacts with guanine nucleotides to form bulky BPDE adducts. These DNA adducts block transcription and replication, compromising cell function and survival, and are repaired in human cells by the nucleotide excision repair pathway. Here, we applied high-resolution genomic assays to measure BPDE-induced damage formation and mutagenesis in human cells. We integrated the new damage and mutagenesis data with previous repair, DNA methylation, RNA expression, DNA replication, and chromatin component measurements in the same cell lines, along with lung cancer mutagenesis data. BPDE damage formation is significantly enhanced by DNA methylation and in accessible chromatin regions, including transcribed and early-replicating regions. Binding of transcription factors is associated primarily with reduced, but also enhanced damage formation, depending on the factor. While DNA methylation does not appear to influence repair efficiency, this repair was significantly elevated in accessible chromatin regions, which accumulated fewer mutations. Thus, when damage and repair drive mutagenesis in opposing directions, the final mutational patterns appear to be dictated by the efficiency of repair rather than the frequency of underlying damages.more » « less
-
The genomic sequences of crops continue to be produced at a frenetic pace. It remains challenging to develop complete annotations of functional genes and regulatory elements in these genomes. Chromatin accessibility assays enable discovery of functional elements; however, to uncover the full portfolio of cis-elements would require profiling of many combinations of cell types, tissues, developmental stages, and environments. Here, we explore the potential to use DNA methylation profiles to develop more complete annotations. Using leaf tissue in maize, we define ∼100,000 unmethylated regions (UMRs) that account for 5.8% of the genome; 33,375 UMRs are found greater than 2 kb from genes. UMRs are highly stable in multiple vegetative tissues, and they capture the vast majority of accessible chromatin regions from leaf tissue. However, many UMRs are not accessible in leaf, and these represent regions with potential to become accessible in specific cell types or developmental stages. These UMRs often occur near genes that are expressed in other tissues and are enriched for binding sites of transcription factors. The leaf-inaccessible UMRs exhibit unique chromatin modification patterns and are enriched for chromatin interactions with nearby genes. The total UMR space in four additional monocots ranges from 80 to 120 megabases, which is remarkably similar considering the range in genome size of 271 megabases to 4.8 gigabases. In summary, based on the profile from a single tissue, DNA methylation signatures provide powerful filters to distill large genomes down to the small fraction of putative functional genes and regulatory elements.more » « less
-
Differential methylation of imprinting control regions in mammals is essential for distinguishing the parental alleles from each other and regulating their expression accordingly. To ensure parent of origin-specific expression of imprinted genes and thereby normal developmental progression, the differentially methylated states that are inherited at fertilization must be stably maintained by DNA methyltransferase 1 throughout subsequent somatic cell division. Further epigenetic modifications, such as the acquisition of secondary regions of differential methylation, are dependent on the methylation status of imprinting control regions and are important for achieving the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes, but little is known about how imprinting control regions direct the acquisition and maintenance of methylation at these secondary sites. Recent analysis has identified mutations that reduce DNA methyltransferase 1 fidelity at some genomic sequences but not at others, suggesting that it may function differently at different loci. We examined the impact of the mutant DNA methyltransferase 1 P allele on methylation at imprinting control regions as well as at secondary differentially methylated regions and non-imprinted sequences. We found that while the P allele results in a major reduction in DNA methylation levels across the mouse genome, methylation is specifically maintained at imprinting control regions but not at their corresponding secondary DMRs. This result suggests that DNA methyltransferase 1 may work differently at imprinting control regions or that there is an alternate mechanism for maintaining methylation at these critical regulatory regions and that maintenance of methylation at secondary DMRs is not solely dependent on the methylation status of the ICR.more » « less
