An official website of the United States government
Abstract Human impacts have led to dramatic biodiversity change which can be highly scale‐dependent across space and time. A primary means to manage these changes is via passive (here, the removal of disturbance) or active (management interventions) ecological restoration. The recovery of biodiversity, following the removal of disturbance, is often incomplete relative to some kind of reference target. The magnitude of recovery of ecological systems following disturbance depends on the landscape matrix and many contingent factors. Inferences about recovery after disturbance and biodiversity change depend on the temporal and spatial scales at which biodiversity is measured.We measured the recovery of biodiversity and species composition over 33 years in 17 temperate grasslands abandoned after agriculture at different points in time, collectively forming a chronosequence since abandonment from 1 to 80 years. We compare these abandoned sites with known agricultural land‐use histories to never‐disturbed sites as relative benchmarks. We specifically measured aspects of diversity at the local plot‐scale (α‐scale, 0.5 m2) and site‐scale (γ‐scale, 10 m2), as well as the within‐site heterogeneity (β‐diversity) and among‐site variation in species composition (turnover and nestedness).At our α‐scale, sites recovering after agricultural abandonment only had 70% of the plant species richness (and ~30% of the evenness), compared to never‐ploughed sites. Within‐site β‐diversity recovered following agricultural abandonment to around 90% after 80 years. This effect, however, was not enough to lead to recovery at our γ‐scale. Richness in recovering sites was ~65% of that in remnant never‐ploughed sites. The presence of species characteristic of the never‐disturbed sites increased in the recovering sites through time. Forb and legume cover declines in years since abandonment, relative to graminoid cover across sites.Synthesis.We found that, during the 80 years after agricultural abandonment, old fields did not recover to the level of biodiversity in remnant never‐ploughed sites at any scale. β‐diversity recovered more than α‐scale or γ‐scale. Plant species composition recovered, but not completely, over time, and some species groups increased their cover more than others. Patterns of ecological recovery in degraded ecosystems across space and long time‐scales can inform targeted active restoration interventions and perhaps, lead to better outcomes.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 1, 2026
Overcoming barriers to restoration: post‐restoration overseeding and topsoil disturbance improve native plant richness and diversity
Restoration outcomes are notoriously difficult to predict and often fall short of restoration goals. Post‐restoration management actions may help overcome barriers to successful establishment, such as dispersal limitations and competition. Layering these management actions to increase the intensity of disturbances may improve restoration outcomes, but they also can be expensive and laborious, depending on the intensity or number of actions implemented. We investigated a series of disturbance intensities on previously restored tallgrass prairies using a randomized block design. Combinations of seeding, harrowing (low intensity disturbance), disking (high intensity disturbance), and herbicide were implemented after a prescribed burn. After 11–14 years, we measured percent cover of all species present to determine long‐term effectiveness. We found that the high intensity disturbance treatment increased native species richness by over 40% and native species Shannon diversity by 15% when compared to control plots. Overall diversity and composition of the plots varied among sites that were treated in different years, indicating that seed mix composition and site conditions were still likely important determinants of community outcomes. Regardless, the consistency of the high intensity management actions to increase site richness and diversity after more than a decade may allow managers to achieve restoration goals, even if later management is limited, justifying the time and resources to enhance existing restorations.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10607920
- Publisher / Repository:
- wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Restoration Ecology
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1061-2971
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Ecological restoration efforts can increase the diversity and function of degraded areas. However, current restoration practices cannot typically reestablish the full diversity and species composition of remnant plant communities. Restoration quality can be improved by reintroducing key organisms from the native plant microbiome. In particular, root symbionts called arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are critical in shaping grassland communities, but are sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance, which may pose a problem for grassland restoration. Studies of mycorrhizal amendments include inoculation densities of 2–10,000 kg of inocula per hectare. These studies report variable results that may depend on inocula volume, composition, or nativeness. Here we test eight different densities of native AM fungal amendment, ranging from 0 to 8,192 kg/ha in a newly installed prairie restoration. We found that native plant establishment benefited from native mycorrhizal inocula, resulting in improvements in native plant abundance, richness, and community diversity. Moreover, the application of very low densities of native mycorrhizal inocula, as suggested on commercial mycorrhizal products, were ineffective, and higher concentrations were required to benefit native plant abundance and community diversity. These data suggest that higher densities of mycorrhizal amendment or perhaps alternative distribution methods may be required to maximize benefits of native mycorrhizal amendments in restoration practices.more » « less
-
Abstract Phylogenetic and species‐based taxonomic descriptions of community structure may provide complementary information about the mechanisms driving community assembly across different environments. Environmental filtering may have similar effects on taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity under the assumption of niche conservatism, whereas competitive exclusion could produce contrasting patterns in these diversity metrics. In grassland restorations, these diversity patterns might then reveal potential assembly mechanisms underlying the impacts of restoration and management conditions on community structure.We compared plant community structure (alpha diversity, composition, and within‐site beta diversity) from both phylogenetic and taxonomic perspectives. Using surveys from 120 tallgrass prairie restorations in four regions of the Midwestern United States, we examined the effects of four potential drivers or environmental gradients: precipitation in the first year of restoration, seed mix richness, time since last prescribed fire, and restoration age, and included soil conditions as a covariate.First‐year precipitation influenced taxonomic community structure, but had weak effects on phylogenetic diversity and composition. Similarly, greater seed mix richness increased taxonomic diversity but did not influence phylogenetic diversity. Taxonomic, but not phylogenetic, diversity generally was lower in older restorations and those with a longer time since the last prescribed fire. These drivers consistently explained more variation in taxonomic than phylogenetic diversity and composition, perhaps in part because species turnover was largely among related species, producing weak impacts on phylogenetic community measures.An impact of precipitation on taxonomic but not phylogenetic diversity suggests that there may not be large differences in drought tolerance among clades that would cause phylogenetic patterns to arise from this environmental filter. Declining taxonomic diversity but not phylogenetic diversity is consistent with competitive exclusion as an assembly mechanism when competition is strongest between related species.Synthesis. This research shows how studying taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of ecosystem restorations can inform plant community ecology and help natural resource managers better predict the outcomes of restoration actions and management.more » « less
-
Coastal dune restoration often focuses on weed removal to reestablish native vegetation communities. Point Reyes National Seashore (PRNS) initiated large‐scale dune restoration after becoming concerned about loss of dune and rare species habitat from spread of non‐nativeAmmophila arenaria(European beachgrass). Two projects removed beachgrass from 146 ha of heavily invaded dunes using either mechanical removal or herbicide treatment. PRNS conducted pre‐ and post‐restoration vegetation monitoring for 10 years post‐implementation, evaluating success in (1) eradicating beachgrass and (2) reestablishing vegetation communities similar to native dunes in cover, diversity, and species composition. Both methods eradicated beachgrass with annual retreatment. However, they were less successful in rebuilding vegetation communities with comparable native species cover and/or richness. Mechanical removal areas remained largely barren expanses of sand that struggled to support native plants except for a rare perennial, Tidestrom's lupine (Lupinus tidestromii). Tidestrom's lupine and other rare plants now number in the hundreds of thousands. Conversely, herbicide‐treated backdunes were dominated by standing dead beachgrass that resisted decomposition even after 7 years, which hampered native and rare plant establishment. Delayed decomposition was less of an issue in herbicide‐treated foredunes, because sand overwash buried necromass. Restored areas also contended with subsequent invasion by secondary plant invaders. By 2021, only older herbicide‐treated backdunes, and to a lesser extent, mechanical backdunes, showed signs of convergence with native dunes. Successful convergence may be hindered by lingering physical and microbial legacy effects of beachgrass invasion and treatment method. Adaptive restoration may be needed to counter effects and improve project success.more » « less
-
Abstract Reversing large-scale habitat degradation and deforestation goes beyond what can be achieved by site-level ecological restoration and a landscape ecology perspective is fundamental. Here we assess the relative importance of tree cover and its configuration on forest-dependent birds and late-successional tree seedlings in restoration sites in southern Costa Rica. The abundance and species richness of birds increased in landscapes with more corridors, higher tree cover, and lower levels of fragmentation, highlighting the importance of riparian corridors for connectivity, and continuous tree cover as suitable habitat. Landscape variables affected abundance and species richness of seedlings similarly, but effects were weaker, possibly because seedlings face establishment limitation in addition to dispersal limitation. Moreover, the scale of landscape effects on seedlings was small, likely because proximal individual trees can significantly influence recruitment in restoration plots. Results underscore the importance of incorporating landscape-level metrics to restoration projects, as knowing the extent, and how the landscape may affect restoration outcomes can help to infer what kind of species will arrive to restoration plots.more » « less
