Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM ET on Thursday, July 16 until 12:00 AM ET on Friday 17 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Lossy Kernelization for (Implicit) Hitting Set Problems
We re-visit the complexity of polynomial time pre-processing (kernelization) for the d-Hitting Set problem. This is one of the most classic problems in Parameterized Complexity by itself, and, furthermore, it encompasses several other of the most well-studied problems in this field, such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set in Tournaments (FVST) and Cluster Vertex Deletion (CVD). In fact, d-Hitting Set encompasses any deletion problem to a hereditary property that can be characterized by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs. With respect to bit size, the kernelization complexity of d-Hitting Set is essentially settled: there exists a kernel with 𝒪(k^d) bits (𝒪(k^d) sets and 𝒪(k^{d-1}) elements) and this it tight by the result of Dell and van Melkebeek [STOC 2010, JACM 2014]. Still, the question of whether there exists a kernel for d-Hitting Set with fewer elements has remained one of the most major open problems in Kernelization. In this paper, we first show that if we allow the kernelization to be lossy with a qualitatively better loss than the best possible approximation ratio of polynomial time approximation algorithms, then one can obtain kernels where the number of elements is linear for every fixed d. Further, based on this, we present our main result: we show that there exist approximate Turing kernelizations for d-Hitting Set that even beat the established bit-size lower bounds for exact kernelizations - in fact, we use a constant number of oracle calls, each with "near linear" (𝒪(k^{1+ε})) bit size, that is, almost the best one could hope for. Lastly, for two special cases of implicit 3-Hitting set, namely, FVST and CVD, we obtain the "best of both worlds" type of results - (1+ε)-approximate kernelizations with a linear number of vertices. In terms of size, this substantially improves the exact kernels of Fomin et al. [SODA 2018, TALG 2019], with simpler arguments.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2008838
PAR ID:
10608200
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Editor(s):
Gørtz, Inge Li; Farach-Colton, Martin; Puglisi, Simon J; Herman, Grzegorz
Publisher / Repository:
Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Date Published:
Volume:
274
ISSN:
1868-8969
ISBN:
978-3-95977-295-2
Page Range / eLocation ID:
49:1-49:14
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Hitting Set Lossy Kernelization Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: 14 pages; 875348 bytes Other: application/pdf
Size(s):
14 pages 875348 bytes
Right(s):
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license; info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Leroux, Jérôme; Lombardy, Sylvain; Peleg, David (Ed.)
    Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) is one of the most studied vertex deletion problems in the field of graph algorithms. In the decision version of the problem, given a graph G and an integer k, the question is whether there exists a set S of at most k vertices in G such that G-S is acyclic. It is one of the first few problems which were shown to be NP-complete, and has been extensively studied from the viewpoint of approximation and parameterized algorithms. The best-known polynomial time approximation algorithm for FVS is a 2-factor approximation, while the best known deterministic and randomized FPT algorithms run in time 𝒪^*(3.460^k) and 𝒪^*(2.7^k) respectively. In this paper, we contribute to the newly established area of parameterized approximation, by studying FVS in this paradigm. In particular, we combine the approaches of parameterized and approximation algorithms for the study of FVS, and achieve an approximation guarantee with a factor better than 2 in randomized FPT running time, that improves over the best known parameterized algorithm for FVS. We give three simple randomized (1+ε) approximation algorithms for FVS, running in times 𝒪^*(2^{εk}⋅ 2.7^{(1-ε)k}), 𝒪^*(({(4/(1+ε))^{(1+ε)}}⋅{(ε/3)^ε})^k), and 𝒪^*(4^{(1-ε)k}) respectively for every ε ∈ (0,1). Combining these three algorithms, we obtain a factor (1+ε) approximation algorithm for FVS, which has better running time than the best-known (randomized) FPT algorithm for every ε ∈ (0, 1). This is the first attempt to look at a parameterized approximation of FVS to the best of our knowledge. Our algorithms are very simple, and they rely on some well-known reduction rules used for arriving at FPT algorithms for FVS. 
    more » « less
  2. Beyersdorff, Olaf; Pilipczuk, Michał; Pimentel, Elaine; Thắng, Nguyễn Kim (Ed.)
    For a length n text over an alphabet of size σ, we can encode the suffix tree data structure in 𝒪(nlog σ) bits of space. It supports suffix array (SA), inverse suffix array (ISA), and longest common extension (LCE) queries in 𝒪(log^ε_σ n) time, which enables efficient pattern matching; here ε > 0 is an arbitrarily small constant. Further improvements are possible for LCE queries, where 𝒪(1) time queries can be achieved using an index of space 𝒪(nlog σ) bits. However, compactly indexing a two-dimensional text (i.e., an n× n matrix) has been a major open problem. We show progress in this direction by first presenting an 𝒪(n²log σ)-bit structure supporting LCE queries in near 𝒪((log_σ n)^{2/3}) time. We then present an 𝒪(n²log σ + n²log log n)-bit structure supporting ISA queries in near 𝒪(log n ⋅ (log_σ n)^{2/3}) time. Within a similar space, achieving SA queries in poly-logarithmic (even strongly sub-linear) time is a significant challenge. However, our 𝒪(n²log σ + n²log log n)-bit structure can support SA queries in 𝒪(n²/(σ log n)^c) time, where c is an arbitrarily large constant, which enables pattern matching in time faster than what is possible without preprocessing. We then design a repetition-aware data structure. The δ_2D compressibility measure for two-dimensional texts was recently introduced by Carfagna and Manzini [SPIRE 2023]. The measure ranges from 1 to n², with smaller δ_2D indicating a highly compressible two-dimensional text. The current data structure utilizing δ_2D allows only element access. We obtain the first structure based on δ_2D for LCE queries. It takes 𝒪^{~}(n^{5/3} + n^{8/5}δ_2D^{1/5}) space and answers queries in 𝒪(log n) time. 
    more » « less
  3. Etessami, Kousha; Feige, Uriel; Puppis, Gabriele (Ed.)
    In the Min k-Cut problem, the input is a graph G and an integer k. The task is to find a partition of the vertex set of G into k parts, while minimizing the number of edges that go between different parts of the partition. The problem is NP-complete, and admits a simple 3ⁿ⋅n^𝒪(1) time dynamic programming algorithm, which can be improved to a 2ⁿ⋅n^𝒪(1) time algorithm using the fast subset convolution framework by Björklund et al. [STOC'07]. In this paper we give an algorithm for Min k-Cut with running time 𝒪((2-ε)ⁿ), for ε > 10^{-50}. This is the first algorithm for Min k-Cut with running time 𝒪(cⁿ) for c < 2. 
    more » « less
  4. Censor-Hillel, Keren; Grandoni, Fabrizio; Ouaknine, Joel; Puppis, Gabriele (Ed.)
    We study the communication complexity of the Minimum Vertex Cover (MVC) problem on general graphs within the k-party one-way communication model. Edges of an arbitrary n-vertex graph are distributed among k parties. The objective is for the parties to collectively find a small vertex cover of the graph while adhering to a communication protocol where each party sequentially sends a message to the next until the last party outputs a valid vertex cover of the whole graph. We are particularly interested in the trade-off between the size of the messages sent and the approximation ratio of the output solution. It is straightforward to see that any constant approximation protocol for MVC requires communicating Ω(n) bits. Additionally, there exists a trivial 2-approximation protocol where the parties collectively find a maximal matching of the graph greedily and return the subset of vertices matched. This raises a natural question: What is the best approximation ratio achievable using optimal communication of O(n)? We design a protocol with an approximation ratio of (2-2^{-k+1}+ε) and O(n) communication for any desirably small constant ε > 0, which is strictly better than 2 for any constant number of parties. Moreover, we show that achieving an approximation ratio smaller than 3/2 for the two-party case requires n^{1 + Ω(1/lg lg n)} communication, thereby establishing the tightness of our protocol for two parties. A notable aspect of our protocol is that no edges are communicated between the parties. Instead, for any 1 ≤ i < k, the i-th party only communicates a constant number of vertex covers for all edges assigned to the first i parties. An interesting consequence is that the communication cost of our protocol is O(n) bits, as opposed to the typical Ω(nlog n) bits required for many graph problems, such as maximum matching, where protocols commonly involve communicating edges. 
    more » « less
  5. We study the bit complexity of two related fundamental computational problems in linear algebra and control theory. Our results are: (1) An Õ(n^{ω+3}a+n⁴a²+n^ωlog(1/ε)) time algorithm for finding an ε-approximation to the Jordan Normal form of an integer matrix with a-bit entries, where ω is the exponent of matrix multiplication. (2) An Õ(n⁶d⁶a+n⁴d⁴a²+n³d³log(1/ε)) time algorithm for ε-approximately computing the spectral factorization P(x) = Q^*(x)Q(x) of a given monic n× n rational matrix polynomial of degree 2d with rational a-bit coefficients having a-bit common denominators, which satisfies P(x)⪰0 for all real x. The first algorithm is used as a subroutine in the second one. Despite its being of central importance, polynomial complexity bounds were not previously known for spectral factorization, and for Jordan form the best previous best running time was an unspecified polynomial in n of degree at least twelve [Cai, 1994]. Our algorithms are simple and judiciously combine techniques from numerical and symbolic computation, yielding significant advantages over either approach by itself. 
    more » « less