The realized niche of many sessile intertidal organisms is constrained by different stressors that set boundaries for their distribution based on tidal elevation. Higher tidal elevation increases desiccation risk but can provide a refuge from predation. Conversely, deeper water increases feeding time and growth but also increases vulnerability to benthic predators. Eastern oystersCrassostrea virginicaharden their shells in response to predator cues, which reduces their mortality from predation. We performed a field study to investigate if this defense mechanism could be manipulated to expand their realized niche and increase space for oyster survival and growth. We raised oysters in the presence of predators (blue crabsCallinectes sapidus) or in no-predator controls, measured changes in shell morphology, and then monitored oyster survival at different tidal elevations across 7 locations with different predator and salinity regimes. Oyster survival was significantly higher at the highest tidal elevations tested. Exposure to predators before deployment also significantly increased shell hardness and survival, with intertidal oysters experiencing greater improvement in survival from cue exposure than subtidal oysters. Intertidal placement (>15% exposure time) had larger effects on survival than predator exposure, but predator exposure increased oyster survival at all tidal elevations, suggesting that predator induction could help oysters both deter predators and resist abiotic stressors like desiccation, and perhaps increase the spatial areas where oysters can be restored. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    This content will become publicly available on June 19, 2026
                            
                            Scared strong: using predator cues to bolster shellfish restoration
                        
                    
    
            Oysters,Crassostrea virginica, are economically and ecologically valuable but have severely declined, and restoration is needed. As with the restoration and aquaculture of many shellfish species, restored oyster reefs are often impeded by predation losses, reducing restoration success and restricting locations where restored reefs are viable. Like many organisms, shellfish can modify their morphology to reduce predation risk by detecting and responding to chemical signals emanating from predators and injured prey. Oysters grow heavier, stronger shells in response to predation risk cues, which improves their survival. We tested if using predator cues to trigger shell hardening in oysters could be performed over a scale suitable for oyster reef restoration and improve oyster survival long‐term. We constructed an intertidal oyster reef using oysters grown in a nursery for 4 weeks while exposed to either exudates from Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) predators or grown in controls without predator cues. Oysters grown with predators were 65% harder than those grown in controls, and after 1 year in the field, had a 60% increase in survival. Predation losses on the restored reef were significant, and the benefit of predator induction for survival was highest at intermediate tidal elevations, presumably due to intermediate levels of predation and abiotic stress. Our results suggest that manipulating the morphology of cultivated or restored species can be an effective tool to improve survival in habitats where consumers impede restoration success. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1948441
- PAR ID:
- 10610971
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Restoration Ecology
- ISSN:
- 1061-2971
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            NA (Ed.)The realized niche of many sessile intertidal organisms is constrained by different stressors that set boundaries for their distribution based on tidal elevation. Higher tidal elevation increases desiccation risk but can provide a refuge from predation. Conversely, deeper water increases feeding time and growth but also increases vulnerability to benthic predators. Eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica harden their shells in response to predator cues, which reduces their mortality from predation. We performed a field study to investigate if this defense mechanism could be manipulated to expand their realized niche and increase space for oyster survival and growth. We raised oysters in the presence of predators (blue crabs Callinectes sapidus) or in nopredator controls, measured changes in shell morphology, and then monitored oyster survival at different tidal elevations across 7 locations with different predator and salinity regimes. Oyster survival was significantly higher at the highest tidal elevations tested. Exposure to predators before deployment also significantly increased shell hardness and survival, with intertidal oysters experiencing greater improvement in survival from cue exposure than subtidal oysters. Intertidal placement (>15% exposure time) had larger effects on survival than predator exposure, but predator exposure increased oyster survival at all tidal elevations, suggesting that predator induction could help oysters both deter predators and resist abiotic stressors like desiccation, and perhaps increase the spatial areas where oysters can be restoredmore » « less
- 
            Restoration of degraded estuarine oyster reefs typically involves deploying recycled oyster shell. In low‐salinity, low‐predation areas of estuaries, high‐volume shell deployments are known to improve flow conditions and thus oyster survival and growth. It is also hypothesized that the physical structure of restored reefs could suppress foraging by oyster predators in high‐salinity, high‐predation zones. That hypothesis is untested. Given limited resources, it is important to determine how much shell is needed for successful restoration and whether there are diminishing returns in shell addition. In Apalachicola Bay, Florida, we manipulated shell volume on an oyster reef to create three 0.4 ha areas of low (no shell addition), moderate (153 m3shell), and high (306 m3shell) habitat structure. We repeated experiments and surveys over 2 years to determine if restoration success increased with habitat structure. Predation on oysters was greater on the non‐shelled area than on the reshelled reefs, but similar between the two reshelled reefs. Oyster larval supply did not differ among the reef areas, but by the end of the experiment, oyster density (per unit area) increased quadratically with habitat structure, plateauing at high levels of structure. Model selection indicated that the most parsimonious explanation for these patterns was that increased habitat structure reduced predation and increased overall recruitment, but that the higher reshelling treatment did not have better outcomes than moderate reshelling. Thus, restoration could be optimized by deploying a moderate amount of shell per unit area.more » « less
- 
            Abstract The capacity of an apex predator to produce nonconsumptive effects (NCEs) in multiple prey trophic levels can create considerable complexity in nonconsumptive cascading interactions, but these effects are poorly studied. We examined such effects in a model food web where the apex predator (blue crabs) releases chemical cues in urine that affect both the intermediate consumer (mud crabs seek shelter) and the basal prey (oysters are induced to grow stronger shells). Shelter availability and predator presence were manipulated in a laboratory experiment to identify patterns in species interactions. Then, experimentally induced and uninduced oysters were planted across high‐quality and low‐quality habitats with varying levels of shelter availability and habitat heterogeneity to determine the consistency of these patterns in the field. Oyster shell thickening in response to blue crab chemical cues generally protected oysters from mud crab predation in both the laboratory and in field environments that differed in predation intensity, structural complexity, habitat heterogeneity, and predator composition. However, NCEs on the intermediate predator (greater use of refugia) opposed the NCEs on oyster prey in the interior of oyster reefs while still providing survival advantages to basal prey on reef edges and bare substrates. Thus, the combined effects of changing movement patterns of intermediate predators and morphological defenses of basal prey create complex, but predictable, patterns of NCEs across landscapes and ecotones that vary in structural complexity. Generalist predators that feed on multiple trophic levels are ubiquitous, and their potential effects on NCEs propagating simultaneously to different trophic levels must be quantified to understand the role of NCEs in food webs.more » « less
- 
            NA (Ed.)Oyster reef restoration efforts and on-bottom aquaculture are frequently plagued with high predation rates. Oysters are phenotypically plastic, and rearing juvenile oysters, Crassostrea virginica, with predator cues causes them to grow stronger shells that increases survivorship in the field. However, induced defenses (e.g., shell hardening in oysters) are often associated with cost-benefit trade-offs, and the extent the increased shell strength persists into adulthood and alters the growth of somatic and reproductive tissues remains unknown. We raised diploid oysters (used in reef restoration) and triploid oysters (used in aquaculture) with and without predator cues for one month before placing individuals on an oyster farm to grow to market size. Oyster shell characteristics, soft tissue mass, and reproductive investment were measured periodically over one year of culture and compared across treatments. Both diploid and triploid oysters had significantly stronger and smaller shells than controls at the end of their nursery period. However, while diploid shells became 15 % stronger and 17 % smaller than controls, triploid shells became 28 % stronger and 23 % smaller. Additionally, triploid oysters exposed to predator cues returned to the size of controls faster and maintained their shell strength differences longer than diploids. Differences in soft tissue mass between treatments mirrored the patterns exhibited in shell size and weight with greater initial physiological costs and faster recovery for triploid individuals. There was no significant difference in somatic or reproductive tissue mass between induced and control oysters of the same ploidy after seven months in the field. Triploid oysters were 15–110 % larger than diploids depending on the characteristic measured at maturity. Additionally, there was a significant interaction between treatment and ploidy because induced triploids had marginally greater growth than their control counterparts while induced diploids had marginally less growth than controls. These findings demonstrate that physiological costs of oysters reacting to predators in early life stages are minimal by the time individuals reach maturity. Early exposure to predator cues is a promising tool for improving oyster survivorship in restoration and aquaculture operations, especially in regions with high predation pressure.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
