More Like this

1. Branching fraction measurement of the $$ \Lambda \to p{\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu } $$ decay

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2026)096  

   Aaij, R; Abdelmotteleb, A_S W; Abellan_Beteta, C; Abudinén, F; Ackernley, T; Adefisoye, A A; Adeva, B; Adinolfi, M; Adlarson, P; Agapopoulou, C; et al (April 2026, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> A measurement of the branching fraction for the decay$$ \Lambda \to p{\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu } $$ $\Lambda \to p{\mu }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\mu }$ is presented usingppcollision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The analysis is based on data recorded between 2016 and 2018, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb⁻¹. The result is obtained using Λ→ pμ⁻decays as a normalisation channel. The measured branching fraction is$$ \mathcal{B}\left(\Lambda \to p{\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\right)=\left(1.462\pm 0.016\pm 0.100\pm 0.011\right)\times {10}^{-4} $$ $B\left(\Lambda \to p{\mu }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\mu }\right)=\left(1.462\pm 0.016\pm 0.100\pm 0.011\right)\times {10}^{-4}$ , where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and due to the limited knowledge of the normalisation mode branching fraction, respectively. This result improves the precision of the branching fraction measurement by a factor of two compared to the previous best measurement and sets a more stringent bound on lepton flavour universality ins → uquark transitions. It is consistent with previous measurements, and the extracted lepton flavour universality test observable,$$ {R}^{\mu e}=\frac{\Gamma \left(\Lambda \to p{\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\right)}{\Gamma \left(\Lambda \to p{e}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_e\right)}=0.175\pm 0.012 $$ $R^{\mathrm{\mu e}}=\frac{\Gamma \left(\Lambda \to p{\mu }^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_{\mu }\right)}{\Gamma \left(\Lambda \to p{e}^{-}{\overline{\nu }}_e\right)}=0.175\pm 0.012$ , agrees with the Standard Model prediction. 

   more » « less
2. A case study of SMEFT $$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ effects in diboson processes: pp → W±(ℓ±ν)γ

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2024)223  

   Martin, Adam (May 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> In this paper we explorepp→W^±(ℓ^±ν)γto$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$ in the SMEFT expansion. Calculations to this order are necessary to properly capture SMEFT contributions that grow with energy, as the interference between energy-enhanced SMEFT effects at$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^2\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^2\right)$ and the Standard Model is suppressed. We find that there are several dimension eight operators that interfere with the Standard Model and lead to the same energy growth, ~$$ \mathcal{O}\left({E}^4/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(E^4/{\Lambda }^4\right)$ , as dimension six squared. While energy-enhanced SMEFT contributions are a main focus, our calculation includes the complete set of$$ \mathcal{O}\left(1/{\Lambda}^4\right) $$ $O\left(1/{\Lambda }^4\right)$ SMEFT effects consistent with U(3)⁵flavor symmetry. Additionally, we include the decay of theW^±→ ℓ^±ν, making the calculation actually$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$ . As such, we are able to study the impact of non-resonant SMEFT operators, such as$$ \left({L}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\mu }{\tau}^IL\right)\left({Q}^{\dagger }{\overline{\sigma}}^{\nu }{\tau}^IQ\right) $$ $\left(L^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\mu }{\tau }^{I}L\right)\left(Q^{†}{\overline{\sigma }}^{\nu }{\tau }^{I}Q\right)$ B_μν, which contribute to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {\ell}^{\pm}\nu \gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to {\ell }^{\pm }\mathrm{\nu \gamma }$ directly and not to$$ \overline{q}{q}^{\prime}\to {W}^{\pm}\gamma $$ $\overline{q}{q}^{\prime }\to W^{\pm }\gamma$ . We show several distributions to illustrate the shape differences of the different contributions. 

   more » « less
3. New physics searches via angular distributions of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D\pi \right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell}\right){\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ decays

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2025)135  

   Bhattacharya, Bhubanjyoti; Browder, Thomas E; Datta, Alakabha; Kapoor, Tejhas; Kou, Emi; Mukherjee, Lopamudra (April 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   The study of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$angular distribution can be used to obtain information about new physics (or beyond the Standard Model) couplings, which are motivated by various B anomalies. However, the inability to measure precisely the three-momentum of the lepton hinders such measurements, as the tau decay contains one or more undetected neutrinos. Here, we present a measurable angular distribution of $$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\tau {\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ by considering the additional decay $$ \tau \to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } $$, wℓ. The full process used is$$ \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast}\left(\to D\pi \right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu}_{\tau }{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell}\right){\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } $$ $\overline{B}\to D^{\ast }\left(\to \mathrm{D\pi }\right)\tau \left(\to \ell {\nu }_{\tau }{\overline{\nu }}_{\ell }\right){\overline{\nu }}_{\tau }$ , in which only theℓandD^*are reconstructed. A fit to the experimental angular distribution of this process can be used to extract information on new physics parameters. To demonstrate the feasibility of this approach, we generate simulated data for this process and perform a sensitivity study to obtain the expected statistical errors on new physics parameters from experiments in the near future. We obtain a sensitivity of the order of 5% for the right-handed current and around 6% for the tensor current. In addition, we use the recent lattice QCD data onB→D^*form factors and obtain correlations between form factors and new physics parameters. 

   more » « less
4. CP violation in K → μ+μ− with and without time dependence through a tagged analysis

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2025)190  

   D’Ambrosio, Giancarlo; Dery, Avital; Grossman, Yuval; Kitahara, Teppei; Marchevski, Radoslav; Santos, Diego Martínez; Schacht, Stefan (September 2025, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> We point out that using current knowledge of$$ \mathcal{B}\left({K}_L^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) $$ $B\left(K_L^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)$ and$$ \mathcal{B}\left({K}_L^0\to \gamma \gamma \right) $$ $B\left(K_L^0\to \mathrm{\gamma \gamma }\right)$ , one can extract short-distance information from the combined measurement of the time-integrated CP asymmetry,A_CP(K⁰→ μ⁺μ⁻), and of$$ \mathcal{B}\left({K}_S^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) $$ $B\left(K_S^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)$ . We discuss the interplay between this set of observables, and demonstrate that determining sign[A_CP(K⁰→μ⁺μ⁻)] would eliminate the discrete ambiguity in the Standard Model prediction for$$ \mathcal{B}\left({K}_L^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) $$ $B\left(K_L^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)$ . We then move on to feasibility studies within an LHCb-like setup, using both time-integrated and time-dependent information, employingK⁰and$$ {\overline{K}}^0 $$ ${\overline{K}}^0$ tagging methods. We find that, within an optimistic scenario, the short-distance amplitude, proportional to the CKM parameter combination$$ \mid {A}^2{\lambda}^5\overline{\eta}\mid $$ $\mid A^2{\lambda }^5\overline{\eta }\mid$ , could be constrained by LHCb at the level of about 35% of its Standard Model value, and the discrete ambiguity in$$ \mathcal{B}{\left({K}_L^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)}_{\textrm{SM}} $$ $B{\left(K_L^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)}_{\mathrm{SM}}$ could be resolved at more than 3σby the end of the high luminosity LHC. 

   more » « less
5. Search for the $$ {B}_s^0 $$ → μ+μ−γ decay

   https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)101  

   Aaij, R; Abdelmotteleb, A_S W; Abellan_Beteta, C; Abudinén, F; Ackernley, T; Adefisoye, A A; Adeva, B; Adinolfi, M; Adlarson, P; Agapopoulou, C; et al (July 2024, Journal of High Energy Physics)

   A<sc>bstract</sc> A search for the fully reconstructed$$ {B}_s^0 $$ $B_s^0$ → μ⁺μ⁻γdecay is performed at the LHCb experiment using proton-proton collisions at$$ \sqrt{s} $$ $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb⁻¹. No significant signal is found and upper limits on the branching fraction in intervals of the dimuon mass are set$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{cc}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[2{m}_{\mu },1.70\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},&\ m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[\textrm{1.70,2.88}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\\ {}\mathcal{B}\left({B}_s^0\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)\in \left[3.92,{m}_{B_s^0}\right]\textrm{GeV}/{c}^2,\end{array}} $$ $\begin{array}{cc}B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(2m_{\mu },1.70\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<7.7\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(\mathrm{1.70,\; 2.88}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\\ B\left(B_s^0\to {\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\gamma \right)<4.2\times {10}^{-8},& m\left({\mu }^{+}{\mu }^{-}\right)\in \left(3.92,m_{B_s^0}\right)\mathrm{GeV}/c^2,\end{array}$ at 95% confidence level. Additionally, upper limits are set on the branching fraction in the [2m_μ,1.70] GeV/c²dimuon mass region excluding the contribution from the intermediateϕ(1020) meson, and in the region combining all dimuon-mass intervals. 

   more » « less